UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities

Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No.    )

Filed by the Registrantþ

Filed by a Party other than the Registranto¨

Check the appropriate box:

o¨Preliminary Proxy Statement
o¨Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)14a-6(e)(2))
þDefinitive Proxy Statement
o¨Definitive Additional Materials
o¨Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12

McDermott International, Inc.

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

þNo fee required.
o¨Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.

 (1)Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

 (2)Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

 (3)Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

 (4)Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

 (5)Total fee paid:

o¨Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

o¨Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

 (1)Amount Previously Paid:

 (2)Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

 (3)Filing Party:

 (4)Date Filed:


LOGO

 


(McDermott International, Inc. Logo)McDermott International, Inc.

 
Stephen M. Johnson 
John A. Fees777757 N. Eldridge Pkwy.
Chairman of the Board of Directors, President and Chief Executive Officer Houston, Texas 77079
March 27, 2009

March 30, 2012

Dear Stockholder:

You are cordially invited to attend this year’s Annual Meeting of Stockholders of McDermott International, Inc., which will be held on Friday,Thursday, May 8, 2009,10, 2012, at 757 N. Eldridge Parkway, Houston, Texas 77079, on the 14th14th floor, commencing at 9:3010:00 a.m. local time. The notice of annual meetingAnnual Meeting and proxy statement following this letter describe the matters to be acted on at the meeting.

McDermott is pleased to announce that we are taking advantage ofutilizing the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Notice and Access proxy rule, which allows companies to furnish proxy materials via the Internet as an alternative to the traditional approach of mailing a printed set to each shareholder. We believe this will allow us to continue to provide shareholders with the proxy materials they need while reducing printing and postage costs associated with delivery and reducing the environmental impact of our Annual Meeting.stockholder. In accordance with these rules, we have sent a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials to all shareholdersstockholders who have not previously elected to receive a printed set of proxy materials. The Notice contains instructions on how to access our 2012 Proxy Statement and Annual Report to Stockholders, as well as how to vote either online, by telephone or in person at the 20092012 Annual Meeting.

It is very important that your shares are represented and voted at the Annual Meeting. Please vote your shares by Internet or telephone, or, if you received a printed set of materials by mail, by returning the accompanying proxy card, as soon as possible to ensure that your shares are voted at the meeting. Further instructions on how to vote your shares can be found in our Proxy Statement.

Thank you for your support of our company.

Sincerely yours,

LOGO

STEPHEN M. JOHNSON

-s- John A. Fees
JOHN A. FEES

YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT.

Whether or not you plan to attend the meeting, please take a few minutes now to vote your shares.


Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to Bebe Held on May 8, 2009.
10, 2012.

The proxy statement and annual report are available on the Internet at www.proxyvote.com.

The following information applicable to the Annual Meeting may be found in the proxy statement and accompanying proxy card:

The date, time and location of the meeting;

A list of the matters intended to be acted on and our recommendations regarding those matters;

• The date, time and location of the meeting;
• A list of the matters intended to be acted on and our recommendations regarding those matters;
• Any control/identification numbers that you need to access your proxy card; and
• 

Any control/identification numbers that you need to access your proxy card; and

Information about attending the meeting and voting in person.


McDERMOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC.

777757 N. Eldridge Pkwy.

Houston, Texas 77079

NOTICEOF 2012 ANNUAL MEETINGOF STOCKHOLDERS

Notice of 2009 Annual Meeting of Stockholders
The 2009 Annual Meeting of the Stockholders of McDermott International, Inc., a Panamanian corporation, will be held at 757 N. Eldridge Parkway, Houston, Texas 77079, on the 14th floor, on Friday, May 8, 2009, at 9:30 a.m. local time, in order to:
(1) elect three Class I Directors for a term of one year and three Class II Directors for a term of one year;
(2) approve the 2009 McDermott International, Inc. Long-Term Incentive Plan;
(3) ratify our Audit Committee’s appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2009; and
(4) transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment thereof.
If you were a stockholder as of the close of business on March 9, 2009, you are entitled to vote at the meeting and at any adjournment thereof.
This year, instead of mailing a printed copy of our proxy materials, including our Annual Report, to each shareholder of record, we have decided to provide access to these materials via the Internet. This reduces the amount of paper necessary to produce these materials, as well as the costs associated with mailing these materials to all shareholders. Accordingly, on March 27, 2009, we began mailing a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Notice”) to all shareholders of record as of March 9, 2009, and posted our proxy materials on the Web site referenced in the Notice (www.proxyvote.com). As more fully described in the Notice, all shareholders may choose to access our proxy materials on the Web site referred to in the Notice or may request a printed set of our proxy materials. In addition, the Notice and website provide information regarding how you may request to receive proxy materials in printed form by mail or electronically by email on an ongoing basis.
If you received a printed copy of the materials, we have enclosed a copy of our 2008 Annual Report to Stockholders with this notice and proxy statement.
Your vote is important. Please vote your proxy promptly so your shares can be represented, even if you plan to attend the annual meeting. You can vote by Internet, by telephone, or by requesting a printed copy of the proxy materials and using the enclosed proxy card.

Time and Date

10:00 a.m. local time on Thursday, May 10, 2012

Place

757 N. Eldridge Parkway
14th Floor
Houston, Texas 77079

Items of Business

1.

To elect eight members to our Board of Directors, each for a term of one year.

2.

To conduct an advisory vote to approve named executive officer compensation.

3.

To ratify our Audit Committee’s appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2012.

4.

To transact such other business that properly comes before the meeting or any adjournment thereof.

Record Date

You are entitled to vote if you were a stockholder of record at the close of business on March 12, 2012.

Notice and Access

Instead of mailing a printed copy of our proxy materials, including our Annual Report, to each stockholder of record, we are providing access to these materials via the Internet. This reduces the amount of paper necessary to produce these materials, as well as the costs associated with mailing these materials to all stockholders. Accordingly, on March 30, 2012, we began mailing a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Notice”) to all stockholders of record as of March 12, 2012, and posted our proxy materials on the Web site referenced in the Notice (www.proxyvote.com). As more fully described in the Notice, all stockholders may choose to access our proxy materials on the Web site referred to in the Notice and/or may request a printed set of our proxy materials. In addition, the Notice and Web site provide information regarding how you may request to receive proxy materials in printed form by mail or electronically by email on an ongoing basis.

Proxy Voting

Your vote is important. Please vote your proxy promptly so your shares can be represented, even if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting. You can vote by Internet, by telephone, or by requesting a printed copy of the proxy materials and using the proxy card enclosed with the printed materials.

By Order of the Board of Directors,

-s- Liane K. Hinrichs

LOGO

LIANE K. HINRICHS

Secretary

Dated:

March 27, 200930, 2012


PROXY STATEMENTFOR 2012 ANNUAL MEETINGOF STOCKHOLDERS

TABLEOF CONTENTS

PROXY STATEMENT FOR 2009 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

TABLE OF CONTENTS

   Page
 

   21  
2
2
2
3
3
3
4

   5  

   810  

   810  

   910  
9

   11  

   1114  
12
12

   15  

   17  

   3417  
18

Executive Officers

24

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

25

Compensation Committee Report

43

Compensation of Executive Officers

35
35
38
41

   44  

   4544  

   4746  
48

Option Exercises and Stock Vested

50

Pension Benefits

51

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation

54

Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control

49
54

   55  

   5660  

   5764  

   6365  
67

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners

68

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

   6469  

   6470  

   6470  


QUESTIONSAND ANSWERSABOUTTHE ANNUAL MEETINGOF STOCKHOLDERSAND VOTING

What is the purpose of these proxy materials?

GENERAL INFORMATION
As more fully described in the Notice, the Board of Directors of McDermott International, Inc. (“McDermott”) has made these materials available to you over the Internet or, upon your request, has mailed you printed versions of these materials in connection with our 20092012 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which will take place on May 8, 2009.10, 2012 at 10:00 a.m. local time (the “Annual Meeting” or “Meeting”). We mailed the Notice to our shareholdersstockholders beginning March 27, 2009,30, 2012, and our proxy materials were posted on the Web site referenced in the Notice on that same date.

McDermott, on behalf of its Board of Directors, is soliciting your proxy to vote your shares at the 20092012 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. We solicit proxies to give all shareholdersstockholders of record an opportunity to vote on matters that will be presented at the annual meeting.Annual Meeting. In this proxy statement, you will find information on these matters, which is provided to assist you in voting your shares.

Proxy materials have been sent or access to

Who will pay for the materials has been provided to you because our Boardcost of Directors is soliciting yourthis proxy to vote your shares at our Annual Meeting to be held on May 8, 2009. solicitation?

We will bear all expenses incurred in connection with this proxy solicitation, which we expect to conduct primarily by mail. We have engaged The Proxy Advisory Group, LLC to assist in the solicitation for a fee that will not exceed $10,000,$12,500, plusout-of-pocket expenses. In addition, our officers and regular employees may solicit your proxy by telephone, by facsimile transmission or in person, for which they will not be separately compensated. If your shares are held through a broker or other nominee (i.e.i.e., in “street name”) and you have requested printed versions of these materials, we have requested that your broker or nominee forward this proxy statement to you and obtain your voting instructions, for which we will reimburse them for reasonableout-of-pocket expenses. If your shares are held through the McDermott Thrift Plan for Employees of McDermott Incorporated and Participating Subsidiary and Affiliated Companies (the “McDermott Thrift Plan”) and you have requested printed versions of these materials, the trustee of that plan has sent you this proxy statement and you can instruct the trustee on how to vote your plan shares.

VOTING INFORMATION

Record Date and Who May Voteis entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting?

Our Board of Directors selected March 9, 200912, 2012 as the record date (the “Record Date”) for determining stockholders entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. This means that if you were a registered stockholder with our transfer agent and registrar, Computershare Trust Company, N.A.,owned McDermott common

stock on the Record Date, you may vote your shares on the matters to be considered by our stockholders at the Annual Meeting. If your shares

There were held in street name on that date, the broker or other nominee that was the record holder of your shares has the authority to vote them at the Annual Meeting. They are seeking your instructions on how you want your shares voted.

On the Record Date, 228,655,752235,564,418 shares of our common stock were outstanding.outstanding on the Record Date. Each outstanding share of common stock entitles its holder to one vote on each matter to be acted on at the meeting.

What is the difference between holding shares as a stockholder of record and as a beneficial owner through a brokerage account or other arrangement with a holder of record?

If your shares are registered in your name with McDermott’s transfer agent and registrar, Computershare Trust Company, N.A., you are the “stockholder of record” of those shares. The Notice and the proxy materials have been provided or made available directly to you by McDermott.

If your shares are held in a stock brokerage account or by a bank or other holder of record, you are considered the “beneficial owner” but not the holder of record of those shares, and the Notice and the proxy materials have been forwarded to you by your broker, bank or other holder of record. As the beneficial owner, you have the right to direct your broker, bank or other holder of record how to vote your shares by using the voting instruction card or by following their instructions for voting by telephone or on the Internet.

How to Votedo I cast my vote?

Most shareholdersstockholders can vote by proxy in three ways:

 

by Internet atwww.proxyvote.com;

• by telephone; or
• by mail.

by telephone; or

by mail.

If you are a stockholder of record, you can vote your shares in person at the Annual Meeting or vote now by giving us your proxy. You may give us your proxy by following the instructions included in the Notice or, if you received a printed version of these proxy materials, in the enclosed proxy card. If you want to vote by mail but have not received a printed version of these proxy materials, you may request a full packet of proxy materials through the instructions in the Notice. If you vote using either telephone or the Internet, you will save us mailmailing expense.


2


By giving us your proxy, you will be directing us how to vote your shares at the meeting. Even if you plan on attending the meeting, we urge you to vote now by giving us your proxy. This will ensure that your vote is represented at the meeting. If you do attend the meeting, you can change your vote at that time, if you then desire to do so.

If youryou are the beneficial owner but not the holder of record, of shares are held in street name, you should refer to the instructions provided by your broker or nominee for further information. The broker or nominee that holds your shares has the authority to vote them, absent your approval, only as to matters for which they have discretionary authority under the applicable New York Stock Exchange rules. For all other matters,Neither the broker or nomineeelection of directors nor the advisory vote to approve named executive officer compensation are considered routine matters. That means that holdsbrokers may not vote your shares will needwith respect to obtainthose matters if you have not given your authorizationbroker specific instructions as to vote those shares. how to vote. Please be sure to give specific voting instructions to your broker.

If you received a printed version of these proxy materials, you should have received a voting instruction form from your broker or nominee that holds your shares. For shares held in street name,of which you are the beneficial owner but not the holder of record, follow the instructions contained in the Notice or voting instruction form to vote by Internet, telephone or mail. If you want to vote by mail but have not received a printed version of these proxy materials, you may request a full packet of proxy materials as instructed by the Notice. If you want to vote your shares in person at the Annual Meeting, you must obtain a valid proxy from your broker or nominee. You should contact your broker or nominee or refer to the instructions provided by your broker or nominee for further information.

Additionally, the availability of telephone or Internet voting depends on the voting process used by the broker or nominee that holds your shares.

Why did I receive more than one Notice or proxy statement and proxy card or voting instruction form?

You may receive more than one Notice or proxy statement and proxy card or voting instruction form if your shares are held through more than one account (e.g., through different brokers or nominees). Each proxy card or voting instruction form only covers those shares of common stock held in the applicable account. If you hold shares in more than one account,

you will have to provide voting instructions as to all your accounts to vote all your shares.

How to Change Your VoteWhat can I do if I change my mind after I vote?

For shares held

If you are a stockholder of record, you may change your vote by written notice to our Corporate Secretary, by granting a new proxy before the Annual Meeting or by voting in person at the Annual Meeting. Unless you attend the meeting and vote your shares in person, you should change your vote before the meeting using the same method (by telephone, Internet or mail) that you first used to vote your shares. That way, the inspectors of election for the meeting will be able to verify your latest vote.

For

If you are the beneficial owner, but not the holder of record, of shares held in street name,, you should follow the instructions in the information provided by your broker or nominee to change your vote.vote before the meeting. If you want to change your vote as to shares held in street nameof which you are the beneficial owner by voting in person at the Annual Meeting, you must obtain a valid proxy from the broker or nominee that holds those shares for you.

QuorumWhat is a broker non-vote?

If you are a beneficial owner whose shares are held of record by a broker or other holder of record, you must instruct the broker or other holder of record how to vote your shares. If you do not provide voting instructions, your shares will not be voted on any proposal on which the broker does not have discretionary authority to vote. This is called a “broker non-vote.” In these cases, the broker or other holder of record can include your shares as being present at the Annual Meeting for purposes of determining the presence of a quorum but will not be able to vote on those matters for which specific authorization is required under the rules of the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”).

With respect to this Annual Meeting, if you are a beneficial owner whose shares are held by a broker or other holder of record, your broker or other holder of record has discretionary voting authority under NYSE rules to vote your shares on the ratification of Deloitte & Touche LLP (“Deloitte”), even if it has not received voting instructions from you. However, such holder does not have discretionary authority to vote on the election of directors or the advisory vote to approve named executive officer compensation without instructions from you, in which case a broker non-vote will occur and your shares will not be voted on those matters.

 

What is the quorum for the Annual Meeting?

The Annual Meeting will be held only if a quorum exists. The presence at the meeting, in person or by proxy, of holders of a majority of our outstanding shares of common stock as of the Record Date will constitute a quorum. If you attend the meeting or vote your shares by Internet, telephone or mail, your shares will be counted toward a quorum, even if you abstain from voting on a particular matter. Shares held by brokers and other nomineesBroker non-votes will be treated as to which they have not received voting instructions frompresent for the beneficial owners and lackpurpose of determining a quorum.

Which items will be voted on at the discretionary authority to vote on a particular matter are called “broker non-votes” and will count for quorum purposes.

Proposals to Be Voted on; Vote Required; and How Votes Are CountedAnnual Meeting?
We

At the Annual Meeting, we are asking you to vote on the following:

• the election of Roger A. Brown, John A. Fees and Oliver D. Kingsley, Jr. to Class I of our Board of Directors and the election of D. Bradley McWilliams, Richard W. Mies and Thomas C. Schievelbein to Class II of our Board of Directors;
• the approval of the 2009 McDermott International, Inc. Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “2009 LTI Plan”); and
• the ratification of our Audit Committee’s appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP (“Deloitte”) as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2009.


3


With the exception of the proposal to approve the 2009 LTI Plan, each proposal, including the election of directors, requires John F. Bookout, III, Roger A. Brown, Stephen G. Hanks, Stephen M. Johnson, D. Bradley McWilliams, Thomas C. Schievelbein, Mary L. Shafer-Malicki and David A. Trice to our Board of Directors, each for a term of one year;

the affirmativeadvisory vote of a majority of the shares of our common stock present in person or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote on the matter. The proposal to approve the 2009 LTI Plan requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of common stock present in person or represented by proxy at the Annual Meetingnamed executive officer compensation; and entitled to vote on the proposal, provided that the total number of votes cast on the proposal represents a majority of the shares outstanding on the Record Date. In the election of directors, you may vote “FOR” all director nominees or withhold your vote for any one or more of the director nominees. For each other proposal, you may vote “FOR” or “AGAINST” or abstain from voting. Because abstentions are counted for purposes of determining whether a quorum is present but are not affirmative votes for a proposal, they have the same effect as an “AGAINST” vote. Broker non-votes will have no effect on the vote on the election of directors or on the ratification of the independent registered public accounting firm. Broker non-votes will have no effect on the proposal to approve the 2009 LTI Plan, as long as the total number of votes cast on the proposal represents a majority of the shares entitled to vote. Otherwise, the effect of a broker non-vote will be the same as a vote against the proposal.

Our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that, in an uncontested election of directors, the Board expects any incumbent director nominee who does not receive a “FOR” vote by a majority of shares present in person or by proxy and entitled to vote on the matter to promptly tender his or her resignation to the Governance Committee, subject to acceptance by our Board. Pursuant to our Corporate Governance Guidelines, the Governance Committee will make a recommendation to the Board with respect to the director nominee’s resignation and the Board will consider the recommendation and take appropriate action within 120 days from the date of the certification of the election results.
If you submit a signed proxy card without specifying your vote, your shares will be voted “FOR” the election of all director nominees, the proposal to approve the 2009 LTI Plan and

the ratification of our Audit Committee’s appointment of Deloitte as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2009. If you hold your shares in street name and you do not instruct your broker or nominee how to vote those shares, they may vote your shares as they decide as to matters for which they have discretionary authority under the applicable New York Stock Exchange rules. Your broker will be entitled to vote your shares in its discretion, absent instructions from you, on the election of directors and the ratification of the appointment of the independent registered public accounting firm.2012.

We are not aware of any other matters that may be presented or acted on at the meeting.Annual Meeting. If you vote by signing and returning the enclosed proxy card or using the telephone or Internet voting procedures, the individuals named as proxies on the card may vote your shares, in their discretion, on any other matter requiring a stockholder vote that comes before the meeting.

What are the Board’s voting recommendations?

For the reasons set forth in more detail later in this proxy statement, our Board recommends a vote:

FOR the election of each director nominee;

FOR the advisory vote to approve named executive officer compensation; and

FOR the ratification of our Audit Committee’s appointment of Deloitte as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2012.

Confidential VotingWhat are the voting requirements to elect the Directors and to approve each of the proposals discussed in this proxy statement?

Our By-Laws provide that, in all matters arising at a stockholders’ meeting, a majority of the voting power of our outstanding shares present in person or represented by proxy at the meeting and entitled to vote and actually voting on the matter shall be necessary and sufficient for approval, except where some larger percentage is required by applicable law or our Articles of Incorporation. No such larger percentage is applicable to any of the items we are asking you to vote on at the Annual Meeting. Because abstentions are not actual votes with respect to a proposal, they will have no effect on the outcome of the vote on a proposal.

Our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that, in an uncontested election of directors, the Board expects any incumbent director nominee who does not receive a “FOR” vote by a majority of shares present in person or by proxy and entitled to vote and actually voting on the matter to promptly tender his or her resignation to the Governance Committee, subject to acceptance by our Board. The Governance Committee will then make a recommendation to the Board with respect to the director nominee’s resignation and the Board will consider the recommendation and take appropriate action within 120 days from the date of the certification of the election results.

What happens if I do not specify a choice for a proposal when returning a proxy or do not cast my vote?

You should specify your choice for each proposal on your proxy card or voting instruction form. Shares represented by proxies will be voted in accordance with the instructions given by the stockholders.

If you are a stockholder of record and your proxy card is signed and returned without voting instructions, it will be voted according to the recommendations of our Board. If you do not return your proxy card or cast your vote, no votes will be cast on your behalf on any of the items of business at the Annual Meeting.

If you are the beneficial owner, but not the holder of record, of shares and fail to provide voting instructions, your broker or other holder of record is permitted to vote your shares on the ratification of Deloitte as our independent registered public

 

accounting firm. However, absent instructions from you, your broker or other holder of record may not vote on the election of directors or the advisory vote to approve named executive officer compensation, and no votes will be cast on your behalf for those matters.

Is my vote confidential?

All voted proxies and ballots will be handled in a manner intended to protect your voting privacy as a stockholder. Your vote will not be disclosed except:

to meet any legal requirements;

in limited circumstances such as a proxy contest in opposition to our Board of Directors;

to permit independent inspectors of election to tabulate and certify your vote; or

to adequately respond to your written comments on your proxy card.

 
• to meet any legal requirements;
• in limited circumstances such as a proxy contest in opposition to our Board of Directors;
• to permit independent inspectors of election to tabulate and certify your vote; or
• to adequately respond to your written comments on your proxy card.


4


ELECTION ELECTIONOF DIRECTORS
DIRECTORS

(ITEM 1)

Historically, our Board of Directors has been classified into three classes, with the term of office of one class expiring each year. In 2007, with the approval of our stockholders, we amended our

Our Articles of Incorporation to phase out the classificationprovide that, at each annual meeting of our Board by 2010. As a result, until our 2010 Annual Meeting, directors elected to a class by our stockholders, will serve one-year terms. Beginning with the Annual Meeting in 2010, our Board will no longer be classified and all directors willshall be subject toelected annually for a term expiring at the next succeeding annual election. Currently,meeting of stockholders or until their respective successors are duly elected and qualified. Accordingly, our Board has ten members. John A. Fees, who became a director in October 2008, was assigned to Class I, and Richard W. Mies, who became a director in August 2008, was assigned to Class II.

The term of office of our Class I directors — Roger A. Brown, John A. Fees, Robert L. Howard and Oliver D. Kingsley, Jr. — will expire at this year’s Annual Meeting. Onnominated the nomination of our Board, Messrs. Brown and Kingsley will standfollowing eight persons for reelection and Mr. Fees will stand for election as Class I directors at this year’s Annual Meeting for a term of one year.
The term of office of our Class II directors —year: John F. Bookout, III, Roger A. Brown, Stephen G. Hanks, Stephen M. Johnson, D. Bradley McWilliams, Richard W. Mies and Thomas C. Schievelbein, — will expire at this year’s Annual Meeting. On the nomination of our Board, Messrs. McWilliamsMary L. Shafer-Malicki and Schievelbein will stand for reelection and Admiral Mies will stand for election as Class II directors at this year’s Annual Meeting for a term of one year.
David A. Trice.

Our By-Laws provide that (1) a person shall not be nominated for election or reelection to our Board of Directors if such person shall have attained the age of 72 prior to the date of election or re-electionreelection, and (2) any director who attains the age of 72 during his or her term shall be deemed to have resigned and retired at the first Annual Meeting following his or her attainment of the age of 72. Accordingly, a director nominee may stand for election if he or she has

not attained the age of 72 prior to the date of election or reelection. Pursuant to these By-Law requirements, Robert L. Howard will retire from our Board after 12 years of service, effective at this year’s Annual Meeting.

Unless otherwise directed, the persons named as proxies on the enclosed proxy card intend to vote “FOR” the election of each of the nominees. If any nominee should become unavailable for election, the shares will be voted for such substitute nominee as may be proposed by our Board of Directors. However, we are not aware of any circumstances that would prevent any of the nominees from serving. Set forth below under “Class III Directors” are

In nominating individuals to become members of the namesBoard of our other directors who will continueDirectors, the Governance Committee considers the experience, qualifications, and skills of each potential member. Each nominee brings a strong and unique background and set of skills to the Board, giving the Board as a whole competence and experience in a wide variety of areas. The Governance Committee and the Board of Directors considered the following information, including the specific experience, qualifications, attributes or skills, in concluding each individual was an appropriate nominee to serve as directors aftera member of our Board for the term commencing at this year’s Annual Meeting. All directors have been previously elected by the stockholders.


5


Set forth below is certain informationMeeting (ages are as of May 8, 2009) with respect to each nominee for election as a director and each director of our company who will continue to serve as a director after this year’s Annual Meeting.10, 2012).

 
         
    Director
Name and Principal Occupation
 Age Since
 
Class I Nominees
Roger A. Brown  64   2005 
Until his retirement in 2007, Mr. Brown was Vice President, Strategic Initiatives of Smith International, Inc., a supplier of goods and services to the oil and gas exploration and production industry, the petrochemical industry and other industrial markets from 2005 and President of Smith Technologies (a business unit of Smith International, Inc.) from 1998. Mr. Brown is also a director of Ultra Petroleum Corporation.        
John A. Fees  51   2008 
Mr. Fees has been Chief Executive Officer of McDermott since October 2008. He joined our company in 1979 and, served as President and Chief Executive Officer of our subsidiary, The Babcock & Wilcox Company, from January 2007 to October 2008; President and Chief Operating Officer of our subsidiary, BWX Technologies, Inc., from September 2002 to January 2007; and President, General Manager of BWXT Services, Inc., a subsidiary of BWX Technologies, from September 1997 to November 2002. His earlier positions at subsidiaries of The Babcock & Wilcox Company include Vice President and General Manager.        
Oliver D. Kingsley, Jr.   66   2004 
Until his retirement in November 2004, Mr. Kingsley served as President and Chief Operating Officer of Exelon Corporation, an integrated utility company, from May 2003, Senior Executive Vice President from February 2002 and President and Chief Nuclear Officer from October 2000. Mr. Kingsley also served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Exelon’s subsidiary, Exelon Generation, from February 2000 to November 2004 and as President and Chief Nuclear Officer of Unicom Corporation, an integrated electric utility company, from November 1997 to October 2000. Mr. Kingsley is also a director of FPL Group, Inc. and is the Associate Dean for Special Projects at the Sam Ginn College of Engineering, Auburn University.        

Our Board recommends that stockholders vote “FOR” each of the nominees named above.

         
    Director
Name and Principal Occupation
 Age Since
 
Class II Nominees
D. Bradley McWilliams  67   2003 
From April 1995 until his retirement in April 2003, Mr. McWilliams was Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Cooper Industries Ltd., a worldwide manufacturer of electrical products, tools and hardware. He was Vice President of Cooper Industries from 1982 until April 1995.        
Richard W. Mies  64   2008 
Admiral Mies is a Retired Admiral, United States Navy. He served in the U.S. Navy for 35 years, including most recently as Commander in Chief of the U.S. Strategic Command for all U.S. Air Force and U.S. Navy strategic nuclear forces from 1998 until his retirement from the Navy in 2002. Following his retirement from the Navy until 2007, he served as Senior Vice President of Science Applications International Corporation, a provider of scientific and engineering applications for national security, energy, environment, critical infrastructure and health. He is currently Chief Executive Officer and President of The Mies Group, Ltd. (a consulting firm) and serves as a director of Exelon Corporation.        
Thomas C. Schievelbein  55   2004 
Until his retirement in November 2004, Mr. Schievelbein was President of Northrop Grumman Newport News, a subsidiary of the Northrop Grumman Corporation, a global defense company, from November 2001. From October 1995 to October 2001, he served as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of Newport News Shipbuilding, Inc. Mr. Schievelbein is also a director of The Brinks Company.        
Ourbelow.

John F. Bookout, IIIDirector Since 2006

Age — 58

Finance Committee — Member

Governance Committee — Member

Mr. Bookout has served as a Managing Director of Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co., a private equity firm, since March 2008. Previously, he served as Senior Advisor to First Reserve Corporation, a private equity firm specializing in the energy industry, from 2006 to March 2008. Until 2006, he was a director of McKinsey & Company, a global management consulting firm, which he joined in 1978. Mr. Bookout previously served as a director of Tesoro Corporation from 2006-2010. The Board recommends that stockholders vote “FOR” eachof Directors is nominating Mr. Bookout in consideration of his:

global experience with the petroleum refining and marketing industry and oil and gas exploration and development industry;

expertise in private equity and finance; and

experience as a board member of public companies, including McDermott.

Roger A. BrownDirector Since 2005

Age — 67

Compensation Committee — Member

Governance Committee — Chairman

From 2005 until his retirement in 2007, Mr. Brown was Vice President, Strategic Initiatives of Smith International, Inc., a supplier of goods and services to the oil and gas exploration and production industry, the petrochemical industry and other industrial markets. Mr. Brown was President of Smith Technologies (a business unit of Smith International, Inc.) from 1998 until 2005. Mr. Brown has also served as a director of Ultra Petroleum Corp. since 2007 and Boart Longyear Limited since 2010. The Board of Directors is nominating Mr. Brown in consideration of his:

executive leadership experience in the oil and gas exploration and production industry;

knowledge of corporate governance issues; and

experience as a board member of public companies, including McDermott.

Stephen G. HanksDirector Since 2009

Age — 61

Audit Committee — Member

Finance Committee — Member

From November 2007 until his retirement in January 2008, Mr. Hanks was President of the nominees named above.Washington Division of URS Corporation, an engineering, construction and technical services company, and he also served as a member of URS Corporation’s Board of Directors during that time. Previously, from June 2001 to November 2007 he was President and CEO of Washington Group International, Inc. (“Washington Group”), an integrated engineering, construction and management services company which was acquired by URS Corporation in 2007, and also served on its Board of Directors. Mr. Hanks has also served as a director of Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. since 2006 and as a director of The Babcock & Wilcox Company since 2010. The Board of Directors is nominating Mr. Hanks in consideration of his:

experience in executive leadership, including his position as the Chief Executive Officer of Washington Group;


6

background and knowledge in the areas of accounting, auditing and financial reporting, having previously served as a Chief Financial Officer;

experience in the engineering and construction industry; and

experience as a board member of public companies, including McDermott.

Stephen M. JohnsonDirector Since 2010

Age — 60

Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer

Mr. Johnson has been President and Chief Executive Officer of McDermott and a member of our Board since July 2010, and has served as Chairman of our Board since May 2011. Previously, he served as President and Chief Executive Officer of J. Ray McDermott, S.A., one of our subsidiaries, from January 2010 to July 2010, and President and Chief Operating Officer of McDermott from April 2009 to December 2009. From 2001 to 2008, Mr. Johnson was Senior Executive Vice President and Member, Office of the Chairman, at Washington Group and at URS Corporation, which acquired Washington Group in 2007. The Board of Directors is nominating Mr. Johnson in consideration of his:

position as our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer;

experience in executive leadership for public companies in the engineering and construction industry, encompassing global experience, technical knowledge and complex business and financial structuring, as well as experience in the oil & gas, chemical processing, power generation, transportation, mining and government businesses;

operational and financial expertise in the engineering and construction industry, both in the United States and in international markets, including having resided, worked or led complex business transactions in the United States, Europe, Africa, the Middle East and Asia Pacific regions;

experience as a recognized leader in the area of risk management within the engineering and construction industry, having participated in the founding of the Engineering & Construction Risk Institute, a global organization focused on developing best practices in risk management, of which he served as Chairman; and

broad knowledge of the demands and expectations of our core customers.


D. Bradley McWilliamsDirector Since 2003

Age — 70

Lead Director

Audit Committee — Member

Finance Committee — Chairman

Mr. McWilliams has served as our Lead Director since May 2011. From April 1995 until his retirement in April 2003, Mr. McWilliams was Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Cooper Industries Ltd., a worldwide manufacturer of electrical products, tools and hardware. He was Vice President of Cooper Industries from 1982 until April 1995. Mr. McWilliams has served as a director and Lead Director of The Babcock & Wilcox Company since 2010 and previously served as a director of Kronos Incorporated from 1993 to 2005. The Board of Directors is nominating Mr. McWilliams in consideration of his:

         
    Director
Name and Principal Occupation
 Age Since
 
Class III Directors
John F. Bookout III  55   2006 
Mr. Bookout has served as Senior Advisor to Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co., a private equity firm, since March 2008. Previously, he served as Senior Advisor to First Reserve Corporation, a private equity firm specializing in the energy industry, from 2006 to 2008. Until 2006, he was a director of McKinsey & Company, a global management consulting firm, which he joined in 1978. Mr. Bookout is also a director of Tesoro Corporation.        
Ronald C. Cambre  70   2000 
Mr. Cambre has served as our Chairman since October 1, 2008. Until December 2001, Mr. Cambre was Chairman of the Board of Newmont Mining Corporation, an international mining company, from January 1995 and served as its Chief Executive Officer from November 1993 until his retirement in December 2000. He was also President of Newmont Mining Corporation from June 1994 to July 1999. Mr. Cambre is also a director of Cliffs Natural Resources (formerly, Cleveland-Cliffs Inc.) and W. R. Grace & Co.        
Robert W. Goldman  67   2005 
Since October 2002, Mr. Goldman has served as an independent financial consultant. Previously, Mr. Goldman worked for Conoco Inc., an international, integrated energy company and predecessor to ConocoPhillips, from 1988 to 2002, most recently as Senior Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer from 1998 to 2002. He formerly served as the Vice President, Finance of the World Petroleum Council from 2002 to 2008. He currently serves as a director of El Paso Corporation, Parker Drilling Company and Tesoro Corporation. He is also a member of the Advisory Board of Global Infrastructure Partners.        

background in public accounting;


7

background and knowledge in the areas of accounting, auditing and financial reporting, having served as a Chief Financial Officer of a public company; and

experience as a board member and lead director of public companies, including McDermott.

Thomas C. SchievelbeinDirector Since 2004

Age — 58

Compensation Committee — Chairman

Governance Committee — Member

Mr. Schievelbein has served as interim President and Chief Executive Officer of The Brinks Company, a secure transportation, cash handling and security-related services company, since December 2011. Previously, Mr. Schievelbein served as President of Northrop Grumman Newport News, a subsidiary of the Northrop Grumman Corporation, a global defense company, from November 2001 until his retirement in November 2004; and as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of Newport News Shipbuilding, Inc. from October 1995 to October 2001. Mr. Schievelbein has also served as a director of Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc. since 2011, The Brinks Company since 2009, including as interim Chairman of the Board from November to December 2011, and New York Life Insurance Company since 2006. The Board of Directors is nominating Mr. Schievelbein in consideration of his:

operational, business technology development and risk mitigation and control experience gained through executive leadership;

experience with the oversight of compensation strategies and plans; and

experience as a board member of public companies, including McDermott.


Mary L. Shafer-MalickiDirector Since 2011

Age — 51

Compensation Committee — Member

Finance Committee — Member

From July 2007 until her retirement in March 2009, Ms. Shafer-Malicki was Senior Vice President and Chief Executive Officer of BP Angola, a subsidiary of BP p.l.c., an oil and natural gas exploration, production, refining and marketing company. Previously, Ms. Shafer-Malicki served as Chief Operating Officer of BP Angola from January 2006 to June 2007; and various other international engineering and managerial positions with BP p.l.c. Ms. Shafer-Malicki has also served as a director of Ausenco Limited since January 2011. The Board of Directors is nominating Ms. Shafer-Malicki in consideration of her:

experience in the upstream energy and supporting infrastructure businesses;

knowledge of and experience with our core customers;

executive experience and business leadership skills, including operations, strategy, commercial, safety and supply chain management; and

significant international experience, having executive or management experience in Europe, Asia Pacific and Africa.

David A. TriceDirector Since 2009

Age — 64

Audit Committee — Chairman

Compensation Committee — Member

From February 2000 until his retirement in May 2009, Mr. Trice was Chief Executive Officer of Newfield Exploration Company, an oil and natural gas exploration and production company, and served as Chairman of its board from September 2004 to May 2010. Mr. Trice has served as a director of New Jersey Resources Corporation since 2004 and QEP Resources, Inc. since 2011. Mr. Trice previously served as a director of Grant PrideCo, Inc. from 2003 to 2008 and Hornbeck Offshore Services, Inc. from 2002 to 2011. The Board of Directors is nominating Mr. Trice in consideration of his:

executive experience as a Chief Executive Officer of a public company;

experience in the oil and gas exploration and production business;

background and knowledge in the areas of accounting, auditing and financial reporting; and

experience as a board member of public companies, including as a chairman of a public company.

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

We maintain a corporate governance section on our Web site which contains copies of our principal governance documents. The corporate governance section may be found atwww.mcdermott.comat “Corporate“About Us — Leadership & Corporate Governance — Corporate Governance” and “About Us — Leadership & Corporate Governance — Board Committees” and “Corporate Governance — Governance Policies.Committees.” The corporate governance section contains the following documents, which are available in print to any stockholder who requests a copy in writing to McDermott International, Inc., Corporate Secretary’s Office, 777 N. Eldridge Pkwy., Houston, Texas 77079:
documents:

By-Laws

Corporate Governance Guidelines

Code of Ethics for CEO and Senior Financial Officers

Board of Directors Conflicts of Interest Policies and Procedures

Audit Committee Charter

Compensation Committee Charter

Finance Committee Charter

Governance Committee Charter

In addition, our Code of Business Conduct may be found on our websiteWeb site atwww.mcdermott.comat “Corporate Governance“About UsCode of Conduct” and is available in print to any stockholder who requests a copy in writing.

Leadership & Corporate Governance.”

Director Independence

The New York Stock Exchange listing standards require our Board of Directors to be comprised of at least a majority of independent directors. For a director to be considered independent, theour Board must determine that the director does not have any direct or indirect material relationship with us. To assist it in determining director independence, and as permitted by New York Stock Exchange rules then in effect, the Board haspreviously established categorical standards which conform to, or are more exacting than, the independence requirements in the New York Stock Exchange listing standards. These standards are contained in the Corporate Governance Guidelines, which can be found on our websiteWeb site atwww.mcdermott.comunder, “Corporate“About Us — Leadership & Corporate Governance — Governance Policies.Corporate Governance.

Based on these independence standards, our Board of Directors has affirmatively determined that the following directors are independent and meet our categorical standards:

John F. Bookout, III
Roger A. Brown
Ronald C. Cambre
Robert W. Goldman
Robert L. Howard

 Oliver D. Kingsley, Jr.
D. Bradley McWilliams
Richard W. Mies
Thomas C. Schievelbein

Roger A. Brown

Mary L. Shafer-Malicki

Stephen G. Hanks

David A. Trice
D. Bradley McWilliams

In addition, our Board also determined, prior to his retirement in May 2011, that Mr. Ronald C. Cambre was independent and met our categorical standards.

In determining the independence of the directors, our Board considered ordinary course transactions between us and other entities with which the directors are associated. Neither Mr. McWilliams nor Mr.associated, none of which were determined to constitute a material relationship with us. Messrs. Brown, Schievelbein has anyand Trice have no relationship with McDermott, except as a director and stockholder. Messrs. Brown, Cambre, GoldmanMr. Hanks and KingsleyMs. Shafer-Malicki are members of the board of directors of one of those entities andwith which we transact business in the ordinary course. Mr. Bookout is an outside consultant for an affiliate of onean entity with which we transact business in the ordinary course. Messrs. Hanks and McWilliams are directors of those entities.The Babcock & Wilcox Company (“B&W”), which pursuant to the transition services agreements entered into by McDermott and B&W prior to the spin-off of B&W (the “Spin-off”), McDermott has transacted with following the Spin-off. Our Board also considered unsolicited contributions by us to charitable organizations with which the directors were associated. Admiral Mies andAdditionally, no director is related to any executive or significant shareholder of McDermott, nor is any director, with the exception of Mr. Howard each serve asJohnson, a directorcurrent or former employee of a separate charitable organization to which we made unsolicited contributions between 2006 and 2008. Mr. Bookout’s spouse serves as a director of a charitable organization to which we made an unsolicited contribution in 2007. The charitable contributions described above were in the usual course of our annual giving programs pursuant to which we made over $1.7 million in total 2008 contributions to more than 200 charitable organizations.


8

McDermott.


Executive Sessions and Communications With the Board

Our nonmanagementindependent directors meet in executive session without management on a regular basis. Currently, Ronald C. Cambre,Mr. D. Bradley McWilliams, our non-executive Chairman of the Board,Lead Director, serves as the presiding director for these executive sessions.

Communications with the Board

Stockholders or other interested persons may send written communications to the nonmanagementindependent members of our Board, addressed to Board of Directors (independent members),c/o McDermott International, Inc., Corporate Secretary’s Office, 777757 N. Eldridge Pkwy., Houston, Texas 77079. Information regarding this process is posted on our websiteWeb site atwww.mcdermott.comunder “Corporate“About Us — Leadership & Corporate Governance — Board Committees.Independent Director Access Information.

Board of Directors and Its Committees
Board of Directors.

Our Board met nine times during 2008.2011. All directors attended 75% or more of the meetings of the Board and of the committees on which they served during 2008.2011. In addition, as reflected in our Corporate Governance Guidelines, we have adopted a policy that each member of our Board must make reasonable efforts to attend our Annual Meeting. All directors then serving on the Board attended our 20082011 Annual Meeting.Meeting, with the exception of Ms. Shafer-Malicki, who was unable to attend due to a pre-existing conflict prior to joining our Board in February 2011.

Board Leadership Structure

Commencing on May 6, 2011, Mr. Johnson has served as Chairman of the Board in addition to his service as Chief Executive Officer. Prior to that date, Mr. Cambre served as Chairman of the Board. In connection with Mr. Cambre’s retirement, our Board reevaluated whether the positions of Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer should be separate or occupied by the same individual, and determined that Mr. Johnson should serve as Chairman of the Board in addition to Chief Executive Officer. As the individual with primary responsibility for managing our day-to-day operations, Mr. Johnson is most familiar with our business and the complex challenges faced by McDermott. As a result, we believe that he is best positioned at this time to identify strategic priorities and lead Board discussions and decision-making processes regarding key business and strategic issues, as well as to oversee the execution of important strategic initiatives. As Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Johnson is in an optimal position to facilitate the flow of information between management and the Board and is able to ensure that McDermott presents its message and strategy to stockholders, employees, customers and other stakeholders with a unified voice.

McDermott has adopted a governance structure that includes:

a designated independent Lead Director;

a Board composed entirely of independent directors, with the exception of Mr. Johnson;

annual election of directors; and

committees composed entirely of independent directors.

The independent Lead Director, Mr. McWilliams, acts as an intermediary between the Board and management and is responsible for presiding at executive sessions of the independent directors and serving as a liaison on Board-wide issues between the independent directors and the Chief Executive Officer, as needed.

Board’s Role in Risk Oversight

As part of its oversight function, the Board is actively involved in overseeing risk management through our Enterprise Risk Management (“ERM”) program. Our Chief Risk Officer administers our ERM program, and presents to senior management and the Board on matters relating to risk management on at least an annual basis. In connection with the ERM program, the Board exercises its oversight responsibility with respect to key external, strategic, operational and financial risks and discusses the effectiveness of current efforts to mitigate certain focus risks as identified by senior management and the Board through anonymous risk surveys.

Although the Board is ultimately responsible for risk oversight, the Board has delegated risk oversight responsibility to the Audit, Compensation, Finance and Governance Committees for each committee’s areas of oversight, as set forth in their respective charters. Each committee oversees risks, including but not limited to, those set forth below, and periodically reports to the Board on those risks:

the Audit Committee oversees risks with respect to financial reports and other financial information provided by us to our stockholders;

the Compensation Committee oversees risks with respect to our compensation policies and practices with respect to executives and directors as well as employees generally, employee benefit plans and the administration of equity plans;

 

the Finance Committee oversees risks with respect to our policies and processes relating to capital structure, capital expenditures, financing, mergers and acquisitions and capital expenditures; and

the Governance Committee oversees risks with respect to the review and recommendation of Board member candidates, the annual evaluation of the performance of the Board and its members, review of compensation for our nonemployee directors and director and officer insurance coverage.

At their respective August 2011 meetings, each committee undertook an in-depth assessment of those areas of risk oversight that were delegated to it, and provided a report to the Board. Also, at its August 2011 meeting, the Board received an ERM report from the Chief Risk Officer, and performed an

assessment and review of the risks described in that report that were not delegated to the committees.

Committees.Board Committees

Our Board currently has, and appoints the members of, standing Audit, Compensation, Finance and Governance Committees. Each of the Boardthose committees is comprised entirely of independent nonmanagementnonemployee directors and has a written charter approved by the Board. The current charter for each standing Board committee is posted on our websiteWeb site atwww.mcdermott.comunder “Corporate“About Us — Leadership & Corporate Governance — Board Committees.” The current membersAttendance at committee meetings is open to every director, regardless of whether he/she is a member of the committeescommittee. The following table shows the current membership, the principal functions and the number of meetings held in 2011 for each committee:

Committees and

Current Members

Principal Functions and Additional InformationMeetings
Held in 2011

AUDIT

Mr. Trice (Chair)

Mr. Hanks

Mr. McWilliams

•    Serves as an independent and objective party to monitor our financial reporting process and internal control system.

•    Oversees the integrity of our financial statements.

•    Monitors our compliance with legal and regulatory financial requirements, including our compliance with the applicable reporting requirements established by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”).

•    Evaluates the independence, qualifications, performance and compensation of our independent registered public accounting firm.

•    Oversees the performance of our internal audit function.

•    Oversees certain aspects of our Compliance and Ethics Program relating to financial matters, books and records and accounting and as required by applicable statutes, rules and regulations.

•    Provides an open avenue of communication among our independent registered public accounting firm, financial and senior management, the internal audit department and the Board.

Our Board has determined that Messrs. Trice, Hanks and McWilliams each qualify as an “audit committee financial expert” within the definition established by the SEC. For more information on the backgrounds of those directors, see their biographical information under “Election of Directors” above.

7 Meetings

in 2011

COMPENSATION

Mr. Schievelbein (Chair)

Mr. Brown

Ms. Shafer-Malicki

Mr. Trice

•    Evaluates our officer and director compensation plans, policies and programs and our employee benefit plans.

•    Approves and/or recommends to the Board for approval such officer and director compensation plans, policies and programs.

•    Oversees our disclosures relating to compensation plans, policies and programs, including overseeing the preparation of the Compensation Discussion and Analysis included in this proxy statement.

•    Acts in its sole discretion to retain or terminate any compensation consultant to be used to assist the Compensation Committee in the discharge of its responsibilities. For additional information on the role of compensation consultants, please see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Role of Compensation Committee, Compensation Consultant and Management” below.

•    For 2011, the Compensation Committee authorized our Chief Executive Officer, in consultation with his direct reports, to establish individual goals under our Executive Incentive Compensation Plan (“EICP”), for our other executive officers who participate in the EICP.

•    Under both our 2001 Directors and Officers Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “2001 D&O Plan”) and our 2009 McDermott International, Inc. Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “2009 LTIP”), our Compensation Committee may delegate some of its duties to our Chief Executive Officer or other senior officers.

•    Under our McDermott International, Inc. Director and Executive Deferred Compensation Plan, which we refer to as the “Deferred Compensation Plan,” the Compensation Committee may delegate any of its powers or responsibilities to one or more members of the Committee or any other person or entity.

7 Meetings

in 2011

FINANCE

Mr. McWilliams (Chair)

Mr. Bookout

Mr. Hanks

Ms. Shafer-Malicki

•    Reviews and oversees financial policies and strategies, mergers, acquisitions, financings, liabilities, investment performance of our pension plans and our capital structure.

•    Recommends any change in dividend policies or stock repurchase programs.

•    Oversees capital expenditures and capital allocation strategies.

•    Oversees our tax structure and monitors any developments relating to changes in tax legislation.

•    Generally has responsibility over such matters up to $50 million, and for activities involving amounts over $50 million, reviews the activity and makes a recommendation to the Board.

5 Meetings

in 2011

GOVERNANCE

Mr. Brown (Chair)

Mr. Bookout

Mr. Schievelbein

•    Identifies individuals qualified to become Board members and recommends to the Board each year the director nominees for the next annual meeting of stockholders.

•    Develops, reviews and recommends to the Board any changes the Governance Committee deems appropriate to our Corporate Governance Guidelines.

•    Leads the Board in its annual review of the Board’s performance and, in conjunction with the Compensation Committee, oversees the annual evaluation of our Chief Executive Officer.

•    Reviews our executive management succession plan on at least an annual basis.

•    Recommends to the Board the directors to serve on each Board committee.

•    Recommends to the Board the compensation of nonemployee directors.

•    Serves as the primary committee overseeing our Compliance and Ethics Program, excluding certain oversight responsibilities assigned to the Audit Committee.

•    Oversees our director and officer insurance program.

6 Meetings

in 2011

Compensation Policies and Practices and Risk

The Compensation Committee has concluded that risks arising from McDermott’s compensation policies and practices for McDermott employees are identifiednot reasonably likely to have a materially adverse effect on McDermott. In reaching this conclusion, the Compensation Committee considered the policies and practices in the following table.paragraph.

The Compensation Committee regularly reviews the design of our significant compensation programs with the assistance of its compensation consultant. We believe our compensation programs motivate and retain our executive officer employees while allowing for appropriate levels of business risk through some of the following features:

Reasonable Compensation Programs — Using the elements of total direct compensation, the Compensation Committee seeks to provide compensation opportunities for employees targeted at or near the median compensation of comparable positions in our market. As a result, we believe the total direct compensation of executive officer employees provides a reasonable and appropriate mix of cash and equity, annual and longer-term incentives, and performance metrics.

Emphasize Long-Term Incentive Compensation Over Annual IncentiveCompensation — Long-term incentive compensation typically makes up a larger percentage of an executive officer employee’s total direct compensation than annual incentive compensation. Incentive compensation helps drive performance and align the interests of those employees with those of stockholders. In addition, tying a significant portion of an employee’s total direct compensation to long-term incentives (which typically vest over a period of three or more years) helps to promote longer-term perspectives regarding our company’s performance.

Clawback Policy — The Compensation Committee has adopted a policy under which McDermott shall seek to recover any incentive-based award granted to any executive officer as required by the provisions of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act or any other “clawback” provision required by law or the listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange.

Long-Term Incentive Compensation Subject to Forfeiture — The Compensation Committee may terminate any outstanding

 

stock award if the recipient, while employed by McDermott or performing services on behalf of McDermott under any consulting agreement: (1) is convicted of a misdemeanor involving fraud, dishonesty or moral turpitude or a felony; or (2) engages in conduct that adversely affects or, in the sole judgment of the Compensation Committee, may reasonably be expected to adversely affect, the business reputation or economic interests of the Company.

Annual Incentive Compensation Subject to Threshold Performance and Linear and Capped Payouts — The Compensation Committee establishes financial performance goals which are used to plot a linear payout formula for annual incentive compensation, eliminating payout “cliffs” between the established performance goals. Threshold levels of performance required to earn short-term incentives are tied to, among other components, achievement of financial results that correlate to the Company’s weighted average cost of capital. The maximum payout for the annual incentive compensation is capped at 200% of target.

Use of Multiple and Appropriate Performance Metrics — Utilizing diversified performance measures helps prevent compensation opportunities from being overly weighted toward the performance result of a single measure. In general, our incentive programs are historically based on a mix of financial and individual goals. In recent years our primary financial performance metric has been operating income. Compared to other financial metrics, operating income is a measure of the profitability of our business which helps drive accountability at our operating segments thereby reducing risks related to incentive compensation by putting the focus on quality of revenues not quantity. Additionally, commencing in 2011, the Compensation Committee utilized relative total shareholder return and return on invested capital as additional performance measures.

Stock Ownership Guidelines — Our executive officers and directors are subject to share ownership guidelines, which also

  
Board Committee
Director
AuditCompensationFinanceGovernance
John F. Bookout IIIüü
Roger A. Brownüü
Ronald C. Cambre
Robert W. GoldmanüChair
Robert L. HowardChair
Oliver D. Kingsley, Jr. üü
D. Bradley McWilliamsChairü
Richard W. Miesüü
Thomas C. SchievelbeinChairü

helps promote longer-term perspectives and align the interests of our executive officers and directors with those of our stockholders. In 2010, we increased the stock ownership requirements for both our executive officers and nonemployee directors to further emphasize this alignment of interests.

Audit Committee.  During the year ended December 31, 2008, the Audit Committee met five times. The Audit Committee’s role is financial oversight. Our management is responsible for preparing financial statements, and our independent registered public accounting firm is responsible for auditing those financial statements. The Audit Committee is not providing any expert or special assurance as to our financial statements or any professional certification as to the independent registered public accounting firm’s work.
The Audit Committee is directly responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of McDermott’s independent registered public accounting firm. The committee, among other things, also reviews and discusses McDermott’s audited financial statements with management and the independent registered public accounting firm.
Our Board has determined that Messrs. Bookout, Goldman and McWilliams and Admiral Mies each qualify as an “audit committee financial expert” within the definition established by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). For more information on the backgrounds of these directors, see their biographical information under “Election of Directors” above.
Compensation Committee.  During the year ended December 31, 2008, the Compensation Committee met five times. The Compensation Committee has overall responsibility for our officer compensation plans, policies and programs and has the authority to engage and terminate any compensation consultant or other advisors to assist the


9


committee in the discharge of its responsibilities. The Compensation Committee has engaged Hewitt Associates LLC, or Hewitt, to assist the committee on compensation matters. Hewitt advises the Compensation Committee on all principal elements of our compensation programs, including market data and practices, and attends meetings of the committee and participates in executive sessions without members of management. Hewitt provides advice and analysis on the design, structure and level of executive compensation. The Compensation Committee considers recommendations from our Chief Executive Officer regarding the compensation of our executive officers. Please see the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section of this proxy statement for information about our 2008 executive officer compensation.
The Compensation Committee administers our Executive Incentive Compensation Plan, or EICP, under which it awards annual bonuses to our officers based upon the attainment of annual performance goals. The Compensation Committee establishes target EICP awards for each officer, expressed as a percentage of the officer’s base salary for that year, and financial goals applicable to EICP awards. The Compensation Committee authorized our Chief Executive Officer to establish individual goals for our other executive officers applicable to EICP awards and, in coordination with his direct reports, to select such other officers and key employees to participate in the EICP and establish appropriate individual performance goals for them. Under our 2001 Directors and Officers Long-Term Incentive Plan, which we refer to as the 2001 D&O Plan, our Compensation Committee may delegate its duties to our Chief Executive Officer or other senior officers. Pursuant to this authority, our Compensation Committee has authorized our Vice President of Human Resources, together with our Chief Executive Officer, to approve awards of options to purchase up to 5,000 shares of stock and 1,000 shares of restricted stock or performance units under the 2001 D&O Plan to officers or employees (other than officers subject to the reporting provisions of Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) in connection with their initial employment or promotion within McDermott; provided that time does not permit the review and approval by the Compensation Committee at its next regularly scheduled meeting and that any grants awarded pursuant to this authorization are subject to ratification by the Compensation Committee at its next regularly scheduled meeting. In addition, our restricted stock awards granted under the 2001 D&O Plan in 2008 provide for accelerated vesting at the Compensation Committee’s discretion if the participant retires and is at least 60 years of age with at least 10 years of service. To facilitate a timely determination in these instances, the Compensation Committee has authorized our General Counsel and Vice President of Human Resources, acting jointly, to consider and determine any request for such accelerated vesting.
Finance Committee.  During the year ended December 31, 2008, the Finance Committee met seven times. The Finance Committee has the overall responsibility of reviewing and overseeing financial policies (including dividend recommendations and stock repurchase programs) and financial strategies, mergers, acquisitions, financings, liabilities, investment performance of our pension plans and the capital structures of McDermott and its subsidiaries. Generally, the Finance Committee has responsibility over many activities up to $50 million, and for such activities involving amounts over $50 million, the Finance Committee will review the activity and make a recommendation to the Board.
Governance Committee.  During the year ended December 31, 2008, the Governance Committee met six times. This committee, in addition to other matters, recommends to our Board of Directors: (1) the qualifications, term limits and nomination and election procedures relating to our directors; (2) nominees for election to our Board of Directors; and (3) compensation of nonmanagement directors. This committee will consider individuals recommended by stockholders for nomination as directors in accordance with the procedures described under “Stockholders’ Proposals.” Our Governance Committee has primary oversight responsibility for our compliance and ethics program, excluding certain oversight responsibilities assigned to the Audit Committee. In conjunction with the Compensation Committee, the Governance Committee oversees the annual evaluation of our Chief Executive Officer.
In May 2008, at the request of the Chairman of the Governance Committee, Hewitt performed a market analysis of nonemployee director compensation using our Custom Peer Group (as defined in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis”) and made recommendations regarding nonemployee director compensation to the Governance Committee. Based on those recommendations, the Governance Committee recommended to the Compensation Committee an increase in the value of nonmanagement director equity awards from $80,000 to $110,000 for 2008. Our management is not substantively involved in Hewitt’s market analysis or recommendation regarding nonmanagement director compensation.


10


Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

All members of our Compensation Committee are independent in accordance with the New York Stock ExchangeNYSE listing standards. No member of the Compensation Committee (1) was, during the year ended December 31, 2008,2011, or had previously been, an officer or employee of McDermott or any of its subsidiaries, or (2) had any material interest in a transaction of McDermott or a business relationship with, or any indebtedness to, McDermott. No interlocking relationship existed during the year ended December 31, 20082011 between any member of the Board of Directors or the Compensation Committee and an executive officer of McDermott.

Director Nomination Process

Our Governance Committee has determined that a candidate for election to our Board of Directors must meet specific minimum qualifications. Each candidate must:should:

have a record of integrity and ethics in his/her personal and professional life;

have a record of professional accomplishment in his/her field;

be prepared to represent the best interests of our stockholders;

not have a material personal, financial or professional interest in any competitor of ours; and

be prepared to participate fully in Board activities, including active membership on at least one Board committee and attendance at, and active participation in, meetings of the Board and the committee(s) of which he or she is a member, and not have other personal or professional commitments that would, in the Governance Committee’s sole judgment, interfere with or limit his or her ability to do so.

 
• have a record of integrity and ethics inhis/her personal and professional life;
• have a record of professional accomplishment inhis/her field;
• be prepared to represent the best interests of our stockholders;
• not have a material personal, financial or professional interest in any competitor of ours; and
• be prepared to participate fully in Board activities, including active membership on at least one Board committee and attendance at, and active participation in, meetings of the Board and the committee(s) of which he or she is a member, and not have other personal or professional commitments that would, in the Governance Committee’s sole judgment, interfere with or limit his or her ability to do so.

In addition, the Governance Committee also considers it desirable that candidates possess the following qualities or skills:

each candidate should contribute positively to the collaborative culture among Board members; and

each candidate should possess professional and personal experiences and expertise relevant to our businesses and industries.

• each candidate should contribute positively to

While McDermott does not have a specific policy addressing board diversity, the collaborative culture among Board members; and

• each candidate should possess professional and personal experiences and expertise relevant to our businesses and industries.
The Board recognizes the benefits of a diversified board and believes that any search for potential director candidates should consider diversity as to gender, ethnic background and personal and professional experiences.
The Governance Committee solicits ideas for possible candidates from a number of sources — including independent director candidate search firms, members of the Board and our senior level executivesexecutives.

In 2010, our Governance Committee engaged Russell Reynolds Associates (“Russell Reynolds”), an independent director search firm, in order to assist in selecting director candidates. After review and individuals personally knownconsideration of approximately 25 prospective candidates identified by Russell Reynolds,

Ms. Shafer-Malicki was appointed to the membersBoard on February 17, 2011 in consideration of the Board.

her extensive experience in our industry and other qualifications.

Any stockholder may nominate one or more persons for election as one of our directors at an annual meeting of stockholders if the stockholder complies with the notice, information and consent provisions contained in ourBy-Laws. See “Stockholders’ Proposals” in this proxy statement and ourBy-Laws, which may be found on our websiteWeb site atwww.mcdermott.comat “Corporate“About Us — Leadership & Corporate Governance — Governance Policies.Corporate Governance.

The Governance Committee will consider candidates identified through the processes described above and will evaluate each of them, including incumbents, based on the same criteria. The Governance Committee also takes into account the contributions of incumbent directors as Board members and the benefits to us arising from their experience on the Board. Although the Governance Committee will consider candidates identified by stockholders, the Governance Committee has sole discretion whether to recommend those candidates to the Board. None of the director nominees for the 20092012 Annual Meeting are standing for election for the first time, withtime.

COMPENSATIONOF DIRECTORS

In May 2011, at the exceptionrequest of Mr. Feesthe Governance Committee, Pay Governance LLC performed a market analysis of nonemployee director compensation and Admiral Mies, who were appointedmade recommendations regarding nonemployee director compensation to the Governance Committee. Based upon those recommendations, the Governance Committee recommended revisions to our 2011 nonemployee director compensation program, which were approved by the Board.

Beginning May 7, 2011, under our 2011 nonemployee director compensation program, cash compensation for nonemployee directors consisted of retainers (paid monthly and prorated for partial terms) and meeting fees as follows:

annual Board member retainer: $75,000;

additional retainer for the chair of each of the Audit Committee and Compensation Committee: $20,000;

additional retainer for the chair of each of the Finance Committee and Governance Committee: $10,000;

additional retainer for the Lead Director: $20,000; and

meeting fees of $2,500 for each meeting of the Board or a Committee (of which the nonemployee director is a member) attended, in October 2008 and August 2008, respectively. Admiral Mies was recommended as a director candidateperson or by telephone, in excess of the eighth Board or Committee meeting per calendar year. Previously, meeting fees of $2,500 were paid for each Board meeting personally attended by a formernonemployee director, $1,750 for each meeting of a Committee personally attended by a nonemployee director who was a member of the Committee, and $1,000 for each Board meeting and meeting of a Committee attended telephonically by a nonemployee director who was a member of the Board or Committee.

No changes were made under our Board.


112011 nonemployee director compensation program with respect to equity awards.


COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS
 

The table below summarizes the compensation paidearned by usor paid to our nonemployee directors during the year ended December 31, 2008. Pursuant to2011. Mr. Ronald C. Cambre, our By-Laws, which require a director to retire atformer Chairman of the first Annual Meeting of Stockholders after attaining the age of 72, Bruce DeMarsBoard, retired from theour Board of Directors at the 2008 Annual Meeting. Admiral Mies was appointed to the Board in August 2008.

effective May 6, 2011.

Director Compensation TableDIRECTOR COMPENSATION TABLE
                             
              Change
       
              in Pension
       
              Value and
       
              Nonqualified
       
           Non-Equity
  Deferred
       
  Fees Earned or
  Stock
  Option
  Incentive Plan
  Compensation
  All Other
    
Name
 Paid in Cash(1)  Awards(2)  Awards(2)  Compensation  Earnings  Compensation(3)  Total 
 
John F. Bookout III $80,500  $124,460      N/A   N/A     $204,960 
Roger A. Brown $81,500  $118,440  $7,820   N/A   N/A  $3,726  $211,486 
Ronald C. Cambre $108,250  $124,460  $7,820   N/A   N/A  $468  $240,998 
Bruce DeMars $16,250  $12,765  $7,820   N/A   N/A     $36,835 
Robert W. Goldman $93,250  $124,460      N/A   N/A     $217,710 
Robert L. Howard $82,750  $127,340  $7,820   N/A   N/A  $648  $218,558 
Oliver D. Kingsley Jr.  $80,500  $118,440  $7,820   N/A   N/A  $6,019  $212,779 
D. Bradley McWilliams $110,750  $127,340  $7,820   N/A   N/A  $2,426  $248,336 
Richard W. Mies $48,646  $84,021      N/A   N/A     $132,667 
Thomas C. Schievelbein $82,250  $127,340  $7,820   N/A   N/A     $217,410 

Name  

Fees Earned or

Paid in Cash

   

Stock

Awards(1)

   Total 

John F. Bookout, III

  $74,500    $119,995    $194,495  

Roger A. Brown

  $85,417    $119,995    $205,412  

Ronald C. Cambre

  $65,750         $65,750  

Stephen G. Hanks

  $75,500    $119,995    $195,495  

D. Bradley McWilliams

  $98,000    $119,995    $217,995  

Thomas C. Schievelbein

  $93,333    $119,995    $213,328  

Mary L. Shafer-Malicki

  $69,250    $143,789    $213,039  

David A. Trice

  $95,583    $119,995    $215,578  

(1)See “Fees Earned or Paid in Cash” belowUnder our 2011 director compensation program, equity compensation for nonemployee directors consisted of a discussiondiscretionary annual stock grant. On May 13, 2011, each of the amounts reportednonemployee directors then serving as a director received a grant of 5,862 shares of restricted stock or restricted stock units valued at $119,995, which were settled in this column.2011 in unrestricted shares of McDermott common stock. In addition to the annual stock grant, Ms. Shafer-Malicki received a grant of 928 shares of restricted stock on March 4, 2011 valued at $23,794, following her appointment to our Board, which reflected Ms. Shafer-Malicki’s partial-year service and which were settled in unrestricted shares in 2011.

    
(2)See “Stock and Option Awards” below for a discussion of the amounts reported in these columns.
(3)The amounts reported represent the aggregate grant date fair value of the restricted stock or restricted stock units computed in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification (“FASB ASC”) Topic 718, using the “All Other Compensation” column are attributable to a taxgross-up associated with income imputed toclosing market price of McDermott common stock on the director as a resultdate of his family member accompanying himgrant ($20.47 on travel in connection with Board business.May 13, 2011 and $25.64 on March 4, 2011). Under the terms of each award, the restricted stock and restricted stock units vested immediately on the grant date.

As of December 31, 2011, the nonemployee directors had aggregate outstanding stock option awards as follows: Mr. Bookout — 6,105 stock options; Mr. Brown — 38,085 stock options; Mr. McWilliams — 37,876 stock options; and Mr. Schievelbein — 72,538 stock options.

NAMED EXECUTIVES PROFILES

The following profiles provide summary information regarding the experience and 2011 compensation for nonemployee directors for 2008 was comprised of cashour Chief Executive Officer, our Chief Financial Officer and equity compensation earnedour three other most highly compensated executive officers, who were employed by directors in connection with their serviceMcDermott as directors. The cash compensation consisted of retainers and meeting fees described in more detail below. The equity compensation consisted of restricted stock awards issued under our 2001 Directors and Officer Long-Term Incentive Plan, whichDecember 31, 2011, whom we refer to as our 2001 D&O Plan,“Continuing Named Executives.” The Continuing Named Executives and Mr. John T. Nesser, our former Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer, who would have been one of our three other most highly compensated executive officers had he been employed by McDermott as described in more detail below. The amounts reportedof December 31, 2011, are collectively referred to as our “Named Executives.” Information on Mr. Nesser is provided in the “Option Awards” column representCompensation Discussion and Analysis (“CD&A”) and the associated dollar amounts we recognized

compensation-related tables included in this proxy statement.

The Continuing Named Executive profiles provide biographical information, including age as of May 10, 2012, and summarize the compensation disclosures that are provided in the CD&A and executive compensation tables in this proxy statement. These profiles are supplemental, and are being provided in addition to, and not in substitution for, financial statement reporting purposes under SFAS No. 123R. Employee directors do not receive anythe detailed compensation tables required by the SEC that follow the CD&A. Please consult the more detailed compensation tables and the accompanying footnotes following the CD&A for their service as directors.an explanation of how the compensation information is calculated.

 

Fees Earned or Paid in Cash.STEPHEN M. JOHNSON  Under our current director compensation program, cash compensation for nonemployee directors consists of the following:

CHAIRMANOFTHE BOARD, PRESIDENTAND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Age: 60

Tenure with McDermott: 3 years

Mr. Johnson has served as our President and Chief Executive Officer since July 2010. Previously, he served as: President and Chief Executive Officer of J. Ray McDermott, S.A., one of our subsidiaries, from January 2010 to July 2010 and our President and Chief Operating Officer from April 2009 to December 2009. From 2001 to 2008, Mr. Johnson was Senior Executive Vice President and Member, Office of the Chairman, at Washington Group International, Inc. (“Washington Group”) and at URS Corporation, which acquired Washington Group in 2007.

2011 COMPENSATION
   an annual retainer of $45,000 (prorated for partial terms); and
  • a fee of $2,500 for each Board meeting personally attended, $1,750 for each committee meeting personally attended and $1,000 for each Board and committee meeting attended by telephone.
The chairs of Board committees, the Non-Executive Chairman and the Lead Director receive additional annual retainers as follows (pro-rated for partial terms):

Annual Base Salary

   the chair of the Audit Committee: $20,000;

Base Salary Earned

$   942,500  
   the chair of the Compensation Committee: $15,000;
  • the chair of each of the Finance and Governance committees: $10,000;


12


Annual Incentive Compensation

   the Non-Executive Chairman: $100,000; and

Executive Incentive Compensation Plan

$              0  
   

Long-Term Incentive Compensation(1)

Restricted Stock Units

$   999,960

Stock Options

$   944,089

Performance Shares

$2,382,132

Pension Plan(2)

Annual Change in Present Value of Accumulated Pension Benefit

N/A

Other Compensation

Deferred Compensation Plan Contribution

$     97,932

Thrift Match

$       6,817

Service-Based Thrift Contribution

$       7,350

Tax Gross-Ups

$              0

Perquisites

$     20,000

Other

$              0

2011 TOTAL COMPENSATION

LOGO  

EQUITY AWARDEDIN 2011

March 4, 2011Restricted Stock Units39,000 units  
March 4, 2011Stock Options98,133 shares
March 4, 2011Performance Shares56,529 shares

(1)   Each equity grant is disclosed at the Lead Director: $15,000.grant date fair value of the award.

(2)   Mr. Johnson does not participate in our qualified defined benefit plan due to commencing his employment with the Company after the plan was closed to new participants in 2006.

Stock and Option Awards.  In addition to the fees and benefits provided to our directors described above, we granted equity awards to our directors under the 2001 D&O Plan.
Under the 2001 D&O Plan, nonemployee directors may be granted stock option, restricted stock, performance unit, deferred stock unit and performance share awards, in such amounts and on such terms, as the Compensation Committee or the Board may determine from time to time. In 2008, all of our nonemployee directors, with the exception of Admiral Mies, received 1,908 shares of restricted stock with a value at the time of grant of $110,000 (calculated based on the average of the highest and lowest price of our common stock ($57.63) on the grant date). Due to Admiral Mies’ appointment as a director on August 1, 2008, he received a prorated grant of 1,782 shares of restricted stock with a value at the time of grant of $84,678 (calculated based on the average of the highest and lowest price of our common stock ($47.505) on the grant date). Under the terms of each award, the restricted stock vested immediately on the grant date.
The amounts reported in the “Stock Awards” and “Option Awards” columns represent the associated dollar amounts we recognized in 2008 for financial statement reporting purposes under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 123R. Under SFAS No. 123R, the fair value of restricted stock and stock options is determined on the date of grant and is not remeasured. Grant date fair values are determined using the closing price of our common stock on the date of grant, for restricted stock, and an option-pricing model, for stock options. We use the Black-Scholes option-pricing model for measuring the fair value of stock options granted. The determination of the fair value of an award on the date of grant using an option-pricing model requires various assumptions, such as the expected life of the award and stock price volatility. For a discussion of the valuation assumptions, see Note 10 to our consolidated financial statements included in our annual report onForm 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.


13


PERRY L. ELDERS

SENIOR VICE PRESIDENTAND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

The following tables reflect the number of shares and grant date fair value, computed in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 123R, with respect to each restricted stock and stock option award granted to nonemployee directors in 2008 and the restricted stock and stock option awards each nonemployee director had outstanding as of December 31, 2008. The fair value of these restricted stock awards determined in accordance with SFAS No. 123R is based on the closing price of our common stock on the date of grant. As a result, the fair value under SFAS 123R is different than the $110,000 value of the grant discussed above.
Stock and Option Awards Granted to Directors in 2008
             
     Stock Awards 
     Shares of
    
     Restricted Stock
  Grant Date
 
Name
 Grant Date  Granted  Fair Value 
 
John F. Bookout III  May 15, 2008   1,908  $111,694.32 
Roger A. Brown  May 15, 2008   1,908  $111,694.32 
Ronald C. Cambre  May 15, 2008   1,908  $111,694.32 
Bruce DeMars         
Robert W. Goldman  May 15, 2008   1,908  $111,694.32 
Robert L. Howard  May 15, 2008   1,908  $111,694.32 
Oliver D. Kingsley Jr.   May 15, 2008   1,908  $111,694.32 
D. Bradley McWilliams  May 15, 2008   1,908  $111,694.32 
Richard W. Mies  August 1, 2008   1,782  $84,021.30 
Thomas C. Schievelbein  May 15, 2008   1,908  $111,694.32 
Director Equity Awards Outstanding at12/31/08
         
  Stock Awards
  Option
 
Name
 (All Restricted Stock)  Awards 
 
John F. Bookout III  1,350   3,150 
Roger A. Brown  0   19,650 
Ronald C. Cambre  1,350   0 
Bruce DeMars  0   0 
Robert W. Goldman  1,350   4,950 
Robert L. Howard  1,800   84,900 
Oliver D. Kingsley Jr.   0   19,950 
D. Bradley McWilliams  1,800   37,876 
Richard W. Mies  0   0 
Thomas C. Schievelbein  1,800   37,426 


14


Age: 50

Tenure with McDermott: 2 years

Mr. Elders has served as our Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer since July 2010, and served in that capacity at our subsidiary J. Ray McDermott, S.A. from April 2010 to July 2010. Previously, he served as: Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer from February 2006 to April 2009, and Senior Financial Advisor from November 2005 to February 2006, of Bristow Group, Inc., a worldwide provider of helicopter services; Director, Financial Consulting of Sirius Solutions, an independent business consulting firm, from July 2005 to February 2006; and Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer of Vetco International, Ltd., a provider of upstream oil and gas production facilities, process systems, technology and products, from August 2004 to May 2005. Mr. Elders spent 20 years (1983-2003) in public accounting firms where he became an audit partner specializing in multi-national energy service companies. Mr. Elders is a Certified Public Accountant.

2011 COMPENSATION

Annual Base Salary

Base Salary Earned

$481,250

Annual Incentive Compensation

Executive Incentive Compensation Plan

$           0

Long-Term Incentive Compensation(1)

Restricted Stock Units

$249,990

Stock Options

$236,000

Performance Shares

$595,438

Pension Plan(2)

Annual Change in Present Value of Accumulated Pension Benefit

N/A

Other Compensation

Deferred Compensation Plan Contribution

$  39,950

Thrift Match

$    7,350

Service-Based Thrift Contribution

$    7,350

Tax Gross-Ups

$           0

Perquisites

$  20,000

Other

$    2,113

2011 TOTAL COMPENSATION

LOGO  

EQUITY AWARDEDIN 2011

March 4, 2011Restricted Stock Units  9,750 units  
March 4, 2011Stock Options24,531 shares
March 4, 2011Performance Shares14,130 shares

(1)   Each equity grant is disclosed at the grant date fair value of the award.

(2)   Mr. Elders does not participate in our qualified defined benefit plan due to commencing his employment with the Company after the plan was closed to new participants in 2006.

GARY L. CARLSON

SENIOR VICE PRESIDENTAND CHIEF ADMINISTRATION OFFICER

Age: 57

Tenure with McDermott: 2 years

Mr. Carlson has served as our Senior Vice President and Chief Administration Officer since February 2012. Previously, he served as: Senior Vice President, Chief Human Resources Officer from May 2011 to February 2012; Senior Vice President, Human Resources from July 2010 to May 2011; Senior Vice President, Human Resources and Organization Development for our subsidiary J. Ray McDermott, S.A. from March 2010 to July 2010; Senior Vice President, Human Resources of MWH Global, Inc., an energy and environmental engineering, construction and water resource management firm, from 2008 to 2010; and Vice President, Human Resources of KBR, Inc., an engineering, construction and services company, from 2004 to 2008.

2011 COMPENSATION

Annual Base Salary

Base Salary Earned

$332,000

Annual Incentive Compensation

Executive Incentive Compensation Plan

$           0

Long-Term Incentive Compensation(1)

Restricted Stock Units

$116,688

Stock Options

$  94,406

Performance Shares

$238,175

Pension Plan(2)

Annual Change in Present Value of Accumulated Pension Benefit

N/A

Other Compensation

Deferred Compensation Plan Contribution

$  24,800

Thrift Match

$    6,030

Service-Based Thrift Contribution

$    7,350

Tax Gross-Ups

$  11,720

Perquisites(3)

$  68,606

Other

$    2,113

2011 TOTAL COMPENSATION

LOGO  

EQUITY AWARDEDIN 2011

March 4, 2011Restricted Stock Units4,551 units  
March 4, 2011Stock Options9,813 shares
March 4, 2011Performance Shares5,652 shares

(1)   Each equity grant is disclosed at the grant date fair value of the award.

(2)   Mr. Carlson does not participate in our qualified defined benefit plan due to commencing his employment with the Company after the plan was closed to new participants in 2006.

(3)   The amount reported for Mr. Carlson includes $48,606 attributable to the cost of providing him relocation assistance in connection with his move from Colorado to Texas.

LIANE K. HINRICHS

SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT, GENERAL COUNSELAND CORPORATE SECRETARY

Age: 54

Tenure with McDermott: 13 years

Ms. Hinrichs has been our Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary since October 2008. Previously, she served as our: Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary from January 2007 to September 2008; Corporate Secretary and Associate General Counsel, Corporate Compliance and Transactions from January 2006 to December 2006; Associate General Counsel, Corporate Compliance and Transactions, and Deputy Corporate Secretary from June 2004 to December 2005; Assistant General Counsel, Corporate Secretary and Transactions from October 2001 to May 2004; and Senior Counsel from May 1999 to September 2001. Prior to joining McDermott in 1999, she was a partner in a New Orleans law firm.

2011 COMPENSATION

Annual Base Salary

Base Salary Earned

$435,575

Annual Incentive Compensation

Executive Incentive Compensation Plan

$           0

Long-Term Incentive Compensation(1)

Restricted Stock Units

$256,759

Stock Options

$212,421

Performance Shares

$535,894

Pension Plan

Annual Change in Present Value of Accumulated Pension Benefit

$  76,760

Other Compensation

Deferred Compensation Plan Contribution

$  43,511

Thrift Match

$    6,689

Service-Based Thrift Contribution

$    7,350

Tax Gross-Ups

$           0

Perquisites

$  20,000

Other

$           0

2011 TOTAL COMPENSATION

LOGO  

EQUITY AWARDEDIN 2011

March 4, 2011Restricted Stock Units10,014 units  
March 4, 2011Stock Options22,080 shares
March 4, 2011Performance Shares12,717 shares

(1)   Each equity grant is disclosed at the grant date fair value of the award.

JOHN T. MCCORMACK

EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT, CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER

Age: 65

Tenure with McDermott: 9 years

Mr. McCormack, 65, has served as our Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer since June 2011. Previously, he served as our Senior Vice President, Operations, from July 2010 to June 2011; Senior Vice President, Operations of our subsidiary J. Ray McDermott, S.A. from January 2006 to July 2010; Vice President of J. Ray McDermott, S.A. from May 2004 to January 2006; and Vice President, Project Services of J. Ray McDermott, S.A. since he joined McDermott in January 2003 to May 2004.

2011 COMPENSATION

Annual Base Salary

Base Salary Earned

$447,381

Annual Incentive Compensation

Executive Incentive Compensation Plan

$           0

Long-Term Incentive Compensation(1)

Restricted Stock Units

$281,173

Stock Options

$253,847

Performance Shares

$634,020

Pension Plan(2)

Change in Present Value of Accumulated Pension Benefit

N/A

Other Compensation

Deferred Compensation Plan Contribution

$  36,170

Thrift Match

$    7,350

Service-Based Thrift Contribution

$    7,350

Tax Gross-Ups

$           0

Perquisites

$  20,000

Other

$           0

2011 TOTAL COMPENSATION

LOGO  

EQUITY AWARDEDIN 2011(3)

March 4, 2011Restricted Stock Units  4,533 units  
March 4, 2011Stock Options11,406 shares
March 4, 2011Performance Shares  6,570 shares
May 13, 2011Restricted Stock Units  8,058 units  
May 13, 2011Stock Options18,312 shares
May 13, 2011Performance Shares11,274 shares

(1)    Each equity grant is disclosed at the grant date fair value of the award.

(2)    Mr. McCormack does not participate in our qualified defined benefit plan because he had not met the applicable eligibility requirements at the time the plan was closed to new participants in 2006.

(3)    In addition to the March 4, 2011 grants Mr. McCormack received grants of long-term incentive awards on May 13, 2011 in connection with his promotion to Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer.

EXECUTIVE OFFICERSEXECUTIVE OFFICERS

Set forth below is the age (as of May 8, 2009)10, 2012), the principal positions held with McDermott or our subsidiaries, and other business experience information for each of our current executive officers other than John A. Fees, who is our Chief Executive Officer and a member of the Board.Continuing Named Executives. For more information on Mr. Fees,our Continuing Named Executives, see his biographical information under “Election of Directors”“Named Executives Profiles” above. Unless we otherwise specify, all positions described below are positions with McDermott International, Inc.

Dennis S. Baldwin, 47,

Scott V. Cummins, 49, has been Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer of McDermott since October 2007. Previously, he served as Chief Accounting Officer of Integrated Electrical Services, Inc,. a national electrical contracting company, from February 2007 to October 2007; as Vice President and Corporate Controller of Veritas DGC, Inc., a seismic company which provides geophysical services to the petroleum industry, from 2005 to 2007; and as Vice President and Corporate Controller of Universal Compression Holdings, Inc., a company providing gas compression services to the domestic and international gas industry, from 2002 to 2005.

Brandon C. Bethards, 61, has been President and Chief Executive Officer of our subsidiary, The Babcock & Wilcox Company, since November 2008 after serving as Interim Chief Executive Officer since September 2008. He joined Babcock & Wilcox Power Generation Group, Inc., a major operating subsidiary of The Babcock & Wilcox Company, in the early 1970s and served most recently as its President from January 2007 to October 2008 and Senior Vice President and General Manager, of its Fossil Power division from February 2001 to January 2007. His earlier positions within the Power Generation Group includeAsia Pacific, since November 2011. Previously, he served as: our Vice President of Business Development,and General Manager, District Engineer and Field Service Engineer.
Robert A. Deason, 63, has beenAsia Pacific, from July 2010 to November 2011; Vice President and Chief Executive OfficerGeneral Manager, Asia Pacific, of our subsidiary J. Ray McDermott, S.A. since June 2007. Previously, he served as(“JRM”) from April 2008 to July 2010; Vice President, Asia Pacific Business Development, Sales and Chief Operating OfficerMarketing, of J. Ray McDermott, S.A.JRM from MarchSeptember 2006 to April 2008; Business Development Director of JRM from September 2003 to June 2007. He was also Vice President,August 2006; and Division Manager, Middle East Fabrication Operations of Fluor Corporation, an engineering, procurement, construction and maintenance services company,JRM from MarchNovember 1999 to January 2003;September 2003. Mr. Cummins joined McDermott in June 1996, and Vice President, Project Management Production, Pipelines & Marine Services of Fluor Corporation from June 1997 to March 1999.
Liane K. Hinrichs, 51,his earlier positions with the Company include positions in marine, fabrication and project operations roles.

Stewart A. Mitchell, 45, has beenserved as our Senior Vice President and General Counsel and Corporate SecretaryManager, Middle East, since October 2008.November 2011. Previously, shehe served asas: our Vice President and General CounselManager, Middle East, from July 2010 to November 2011; Vice President and Corporate SecretaryGeneral Manager of JRM from July 2007 to July 2010; General Manager of Middle East Projects of JRM from October 2005 to June 2007, Project Director and Manager of numerous projects for JRM from January 20072002 to September 2008; Corporate Secretary2005 and Associate General Counsel, Corporate ComplianceConstruction Management and Transactions from January 2006 to December 2006; Associate General Counsel, Transactions, Corporate Compliance and Deputy Corporate SecretaryField Operations of JRM from June 20041992 to December 2005; Assistant General Counsel, Corporate Secretary and Transactions from October 2001 to May 2004; and Senior Counsel from May 1999 to September 2001. Prior to joining McDermott in 1999, she was a partner in a New Orleans law firm.

Preston Johnson, Jr.,1992, he held project engineering positions with European Marine Contractors (a joint venture company of Brown & Root and Saipem SpA).

Steven W. Roll, 53, has been our Senior Vice President, Human Resources since May 2008. Previously, Mr. Johnson served as Vice President, Global Human Resources and Health Services at Anadarko Petroleum Corporation (a global oil and natural gas exploration and production company) from October 2005 to May 2008; Senior Vice President for Human Resources and Business Services at CenterPoint Energy, Inc. (an electric, gas, pipeline and power distribution and delivery company) from March 2000 to October 2005; and Global Director, Human Resources at The Dow Chemical Company (a diversified chemical company) from June 1977 to March 2000.

John D. Krueger, 62, has been our Vice President, Corporate Development and Strategic Planning since October 2008. He joined the Company in 1976 and served most recently as Vice President, Planning and Business Development for our subsidiary, The Babcock & Wilcox Company, from October 2006 to September 2008 and Vice President, Business Development of The Babcock & Wilcox Company from March 2004 to October 2006. He also served as Vice President, Business Development for our subsidiary, J. Ray McDermott, S.A., from June 1998 to March 2004 and as Vice President, Planning and Business Development of McDermott International, Inc., from June 1993 to June 1998. His prior positions within the Company include Director of Corporate Business Planning & Analysis, Director of Corporate Development and Senior Analyst.
James C. Lewis, 53, has been our Vice President, Treasurer since March 2006. Previously, he was: Assistant Treasurer of McDermott from July 2003 to February 2006; Vice President, Structuring of Enron Corp., from


15


December 2001 to July 2003 and Vice President, Structuring of Enron Global Markets, LLC, a subsidiary of Enron Corp., from September 2000 to December 2001.
John T. Nesser, III, 60, has been our Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of our subsidiary J. Ray McDermott, S.A. since October 2008. Previously, he served as our Executive Vice President, Chief Administrative and Legal Officer from January 2007 to September 2008; Executive Vice President and General Counsel from January 2006 to January 2007; Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary from February 2001 to January 2006; Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary from January 2000 to February 2001; Vice President and Associate General Counsel from June 1999 to January 2000; and Associate General Counsel from October 1998 to June 1999. Previously, he served as a managing partner of Nesser, King & LeBlanc, a New Orleans law firm, which he co-founded in 1985.
Michael S. Taff, 47, has been our Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer since April 2007. He served as our Vice President and Chief Accounting OfficerGeneral Manager, Atlantic, since November 2011. Previously, he served as: our Vice President, Global Commercial Development from June 20052011 to November 2011; Vice President, Global Business Development from May 2011 to June 2011; Vice President, Business Development and Operational Strategy from July 2010 to May 2011; Vice President, Business Development and Operational Strategy of JRM from May 2010 to July 2010; Vice President of JRM from April 2007. Previously, Mr. Taff served as2008 to May 2010; and Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerGeneral Manager of HMT Inc., an engineering and construction company,JRM from June 2004January 2002 to June 2005 and as Vice President and Corporate Controller of Philip Services Corporation, a provider of industrial, environmental, transportation and container services, from September 1994 to May 2004.
In addition, Bruce W. Wilkinson retired from McDermott duringApril 2008. Mr. Wilkinson served as our Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board from August 2000 to September 2008. He retired fromRoll has held various other positions since he joined McDermott on September 30, 2008.


16in 1980.


COMPENSATIONDISCUSSIONAND ANALYSIS

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
The following Compensation Discussion and Analysis, or CD&A, provides information relevant to understanding the 20082011 compensation of our executive officers identified in the Summary Compensation Table, on page 35, whom we refer to as our Named Executives.Executives (we refer to our Named Executives other than Mr. Nesser, who retired in 2011, as our “Continuing Named Executives”). The following discussion also contains statements regarding future individual and company performance targets and goals. These targets and goals are disclosed in the limited context of our compensation programs and should not be understood to be statements of management’s expectations or estimates of results or other guidance. We caution investors not to apply these statements toin other contexts.

Executive Summary

The Compensation Committee seeks to design compensation programs for our Named Executives to promote company and shareholder goals. To be competitive,

In 2011, the Compensation Committee generally sets target compensation around the median compensation of officers in comparable positions in our market, which we describe below under “— Overview of Compensation Programscontinued its commitment to targeting reasonable and Objectives — Defining our Market.” To drive performance, a majority of a Named Executive’s target compensation consists of equity-based and performance-based compensation components. We consider these components variable or “at-risk” because the value of the compensation earned is dependent on our stock priceand/or actual performance relative to specific annual and long-term goals.

In 2008, variable compensation, consisting of our annual bonus and equity-based awards, represented, on average, approximately 83% of the value of a Named Executive’s target compensation (excluding Mr. Wilkinson, who retired in 2008). A portion of our Named Executives’ variable compensation consisted of restricted stock awards that are not tied to performance measures but which helped ensure that our equity-based awards address retention as well as performance. Otherwise, 100% of the 2008 target annual bonus and about 75% of the target equity-basedcompetitive total direct compensation for our Named Executives, were tied towith a significant and increased portion of that compensation being performance-based. Accordingly, our compensation programs provide competitive opportunities, but the earning of most of those opportunities is dependent upon achievement of specific financial performance based on operating income and, in the case of the annual bonus, individualgoals and/or stock price performance. The Compensation Committee believes that aligning a significant portion of a Named Executive’s compensation with short and longer-term operating income goals drives longer-term financial objectives that are expected to create shareholder value without encouraging executives to take unnecessary and excessive risks to achieve those objectives. Additionally, the Compensation Committee has begun to study “claw back” practices, with a view to implementing provisions that may permit us to recover cash and equity we pay or award to certain officers, including Named Executives, in the event of a material restatement of our financial results as a result of intentional misconduct.
Based on 2008 financial results and attainment of individual goals, the amounts paid to our Named Executives, including Mr. Wilkinson, under our annual bonus plan and as discretionary awards represented, on average, approximately 89% of the target amount of 2008 annual bonuses for Named Executives. On a consolidated basis, we earned approximately $570 million of operating income in 2008, outperforming the 2008 threshold goal of $511.5 million. The Babcock & Wilcox Company, or B&W, is our subsidiary under which our Power Generation Systems and Government Operations segments are organized. With operating income of over $450 million in 2008, B&W exceeded its 2008 maximum operating income goal of $320.0 million. J. Ray McDermott, S.A., or J. Ray, which is our subsidiary under which our Offshore Oil and Gas Construction segment is organized, earned approximately $140 million of operating income in 2008, underperforming its threshold operating income goal of $318.7 million. J. Ray’s 2008 operating income results significantly affected the payout of the 2008 annual bonus for our Named Executives and, because of the financial performance conditions associated with 2008 awards of performance shares, substantially decreased the potential overall value of the equity-based compensation delivered to our Named Executives in 2008. Despite J. Ray’s disappointing results in 2008, McDermott produced its second highest annual consolidated operating income in recent history.


17


Bruce W. Wilkinson, our former Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, retired on September 30, 2008. In addition, several of our officers were promoted during 2008 which impacted both the composition of our Named Executives and the amount of compensation paid to them. Effective October 1, 2008:
• John A. Fees, an employee of nearly 30 years, was appointed our Chief Executive Officer and a member of the Board of Directors;
• Brandon C. Bethards, an employee of 35 years, succeeded Mr. Fees at B&W as Interim Chief Executive Officer and, effective November 4, 2008, as B&W’s President and Chief Executive Officer; and
• John T. Nesser, III, an employee of 10 years, was appointed Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of J. Ray.
Overview of Compensation Programs and Objectives
Philosophy and Objectives. Our compensation programs are based on our belief that our ability to attract, retain and motivate qualified employees with the requisite skill and experience to develop, expand and execute sound business opportunities is essential to our success and the success of our shareholders. To that end, thecompany. The Compensation Committee, andwith the assistance of its compensation consultant, Hewitt Associates LLC, or Hewitt, designhas designed and implementadministered compensation programs with the participation of our management.management in light of this philosophy. These programs generally seek to:to provide compensation that:

incentivizes and rewards short- and long-term performance, continuity of service and individual contributions; and

promotes retention of well-qualified executives, while aligning the interests of our executives with those of our stockholders.

Reflecting these compensation objectives, compensation arrangements in 2011 for our Continuing Named Executives resulted in:

target total direct compensation within approximately 15% of the median compensation for officers in comparable positions

in our market, with the exception of Mr. Johnson, whose target total direct compensation was set slightly above market due to his demonstrated leadership following the Spin-off;

performance-based compensation accounting for over 60% of target total direct compensation, on average, as compared to 46% in 2010; and

performance-based compensation accounting for 75% of target long-term incentive compensation, as compared to 50% in 2010.

As in prior years, our Compensation Committee continued to believe that a significant portion of a Named Executive’s compensation should be performance-based, designed to promote and reward the achievement of short- and longer-term objectives that are expected to drive stockholder value. Performance-based compensation for 2011 reflected a balance among the goals of driving operational performance and pursuing long-term stock appreciation. With these goals in mind, we continued to utilize our established approaches of tying annual incentives to operating income and granting stock options as a component of long-term incentives, while implementing some adjustments. Among the adjustments was the inclusion of return on invested capital as a financial performance component of annual incentives. We also resumed granting performance shares, which may vest based upon McDermott’s total shareholder return relative to its peers. The Compensation Committee had decided not to utilize performance shares as an element of long-term incentive compensation in 2010, in anticipation of the spin-off of The Babcock & Wilcox Company to our stockholders ( the “Spin-off”), which was completed on July 30, 2010. In using the performance metrics described above and emphasizing longer-term performance incentives for the 2011 compensation program, the Compensation Committee believes that our compensation practices help to create stockholder value without encouraging executives to take unnecessary and excessive risks to earn incentive compensation.

The significant 2011 adjustments to the performance-based elements of total direct compensation are reflected below:

Annual Incentive:    The 70% financial performance component of the annual

 

incentive for 2011 was 70% based on operating income and 30% based on return on invested capital (“ROIC”). The Compensation Committee believes that ROIC is an appropriate financial measure to use for compensation purposes in addition to operating income because it is an indicator of McDermott’s capital efficiency and productivity. ROIC incentivizes the efficient management of assets and aligns management’s interests with those of our stockholders by measuring stockholder value creation and/or erosion when compared to the cost of capital.

Long-Term Incentives:    In 2011, our Compensation Committee increased the percentage of performance-based compensation in our long-term incentive awards for Continuing Named Executives by 50% over 2010. Specifically, performance-based compensation was increased by our Compensation Committee from 50% of long-term incentive compensation for Continuing Named Executives in 2010 to 75% of long-term incentive compensation for Continuing Named Executives in 2011. Additionally, in 2011 our Compensation Committee resumed the use of performance shares, in addition to awards of restricted stock units and stock options. Long-term incentives for Continuing Named Executives in 2011 were comprised 50% of performance shares, 25% of restricted stock units and 25% of stock options, resulting in 75% of long-term incentives being performance-based. The 2011 performance shares may be paid out based upon McDermott’s relative total shareholder return in comparison to its peers over three-, four- and five-year periods. The Compensation Committee believes the performance shares are an appropriate element of incentive compensation in that they align management’s interests with those of our stockholders by focusing on long-term stockholder return.

McDermott’s financial performance in 2011 included:

Consolidated revenue of $3.4 billion, as compared to $2.4 billion for 2010;

Consolidated operating income of $250.7 million, as compared to $314.9 million for 2010; and

Consolidated ROIC of 8%.

Operationally, in 2011 McDermott:

Achieved backlog of $3.88 billion as of December 31, 2011;

Achieved substantial growth in the Asia Pacific segment, as reflected by increases of over 115% in both revenue and operating income in the segment as compared to 2010;

Amended/refinanced its credit facility to extend the scheduled maturity date, provide additional liquidity, obtain additional flexibility under covenants and reduce fees; and

Established a joint venture entity which we co-own with two Brazilian companies, which joint venture plans to bid to provide engineering, procurement and construction services to the oil and gas industry offshore Brazil.

Under McDermott’s 2011 compensation program,

None of the Continuing Named Executives were awarded bonuses under the 2011 EICP. Based on McDermott’s 2011 financial results, the Continuing Named Executives were eligible to earn approximately 18% of their respective 2011 target EICP compensation, subject to the assessment of their respective individual goals. Upon the recommendation of Mr. Johnson based on the 2011 financial results, the Compensation Committee, in the exercise of its discretion, determined that, although the Continuing Named Executives and other participants in the EICP were eligible to earn approximately 18% of their target EICP compensation, 0% would be awarded in light of the financial results. Instead, as recommended by Mr. Johnson, the Compensation Committee determined that the bonus amounts that otherwise would have been payable should effectively be returned to the shareholders in the form of additional operating income. In making this recommendation and decision, respectively, Mr. Johnson and the Compensation Committee considered the increase in 2011

revenues of approximately 43%, together with the decrease in 2011 operating income by approximately 20%, from 2010 levels, the continued performance issues in the Atlantic segment and issues relating to several projects in other segments.

In making its decision not to award bonuses for 2011 under the EICP, the Compensation Committee noted that Mr. Johnson had achieved the individual performance component, based on the Governance Committee’s assessment of Mr. Johnson’s individual performance against stated goals, and each of Messrs. Elders, Carlson and McCormack and Ms. Hinrichs had achieved their respective individual performance components based on Mr. Johnson’s assessment of their respective individual

performance achievements against stated goals, with the exception of the financial performance goal and safety goal for Mr. McCormack.

As of December 31, 2011, (1) the estimated payout as a percent of target for the performance shares granted in 2011 was 0%, and (2) the share price of our common stock had not exceeded the strike price of the stock options granted in 2011, although as noted below, the estimated payout and share price may change during the term of the performance shares and stock options.

The following table summarizes the 2011 performance-based compensation opportunities for each of our Continuing Named Executives as compared to the realizable value of such opportunities as of December 31, 2011:

2011 Performance-Based Compensation Opportunity vs. Realizable Value as of December 31, 2011

    EICP(1)   Performance
Shares(2)(3)
   Stock
Options(2)(3)
   Total 

S. M. Johnson

        

2011 Opportunity

  $942,603    $2,382,132    $944,089    $4,268,824  

2011 Realizable Value

  $0    $0    $0    $0  

P. L. Elders

        

2011 Opportunity

  $336,911    $595,438    $236,000    $1,168,349  

2011 Realizable Value

  $0    $0    $0    $0  

G. L. Carlson

        

2011 Opportunity

  $199,233    $238,175    $94,406    $531,814  

2011 Realizable Value

  $0    $0    $0    $0  

L. K. Hinrichs

        

2011 Opportunity

  $261,381    $535,894    $212,421    $1,009,696  

2011 Realizable Value

  $0    $0    $0    $0  

J. T. McCormack

        

2011 Opportunity

  $274,549    $634,020    $253,847    $1,162,416  

2011 Realizable Value

  $0    $0    $0    $0  

(1)2011 Opportunity Values for EICP are disclosed at the Continuing Named Executives’ target EICP award. The 2011 Opportunity Value provided for Mr. McCormack reflects his target EICP award following his promotion to Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer.

(2)2011 Opportunity Values for performance shares and stock options are disclosed at the grant date fair value of the respective awards.

(3)The 2011 Realizable Values shown above are measured as of December 31, 2011. However, the amount of the performance shares granted in 2011 that ultimately vest, if any, will be determined by reference to our total shareholder return over three-, four- and five-year periods. See “Long-Term Incentive Compensation — Analysis of 2011 Equity Grants.” The vesting of any of these performance shares would impact the future Realizable Value of these performance share awards. In addition, an increase in our stock price compared to our stock price at December 31, 2011 may impact the future Realizable Value of the stock option awards granted in 2011.

Over the past two years, McDermott has also adopted certain compensation and governance policies and practices, as summarized below:

Change in control agreements that: (1) contain what is commonly referred to as a “double trigger,” that is, they provide benefits only upon an involuntary termination or constructive termination of the executive officer within one year following a change in control; (2) do not provide for excise tax gross-ups, thereby eliminating the gross-up provisions in prior agreements; and (3) require the applicable officer’s execution of a release prior to payment of certain benefits.

Revised stock ownership guidelines that require our officers at the level of vice president or above and nonemployee directors to retain a dollar value of McDermott stock based on a multiple of their respective base salaries or annual retainers.

A clawback policy under which McDermott would seek to recover any incentive-based award granted to any executive officer as required by the provisions of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act or any other “clawback” provision required by law or the listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange; and prohibition of directors, officers and employees from engaging in “short sales” or trading in puts, calls or other options on McDermott’s common stock, and prohibition from engaging in hedging transactions and from holding McDermott shares in a margin account or pledging McDermott shares as collateral for a loan.

Impact of 2011 Say on Pay Vote on Executive Compensation

In approving the 2012 compensation of the Continuing Named Executives, the Compensation Committee reviewed the vote on the say-on-pay proposal at the 2011 annual general meeting of stockholders. Approximately 99% of the votes cast on the say-on-pay proposal at that meeting were voted in favor of the proposal. The Compensation Committee believes this affirms stockholders’ support of the Company’s approach to executive compensation. Accordingly, the Compensation Committee did not adopt any specific changes based on the vote. The Compensation Committee will continue to consider the outcome of the Company’s

say-on-pay votes when making future compensation decisions for the named executive officers. The Compensation Committee expects to continue to hold the advisory vote to approve named executive officer compensation every year.

Role of Compensation Committee, Compensation Consultant and Management

Compensation Committee.    The Compensation Committee has primary responsibility for determining and approving, on an annual basis, the compensation of our CEO and other executive officers. The Compensation Committee receives information and advice from its compensation consultant as well as from our human resources department and management to assist in compensation determinations.

Compensation Consultant.    Our Compensation Committee selected and engaged Pay Governance LLC, or “Pay Governance,” to serve as the consultant to the Compensation Committee on executive and director compensation matters in November 2010, and Pay Governance has been serving in that capacity since that time. Pay Governance provides advice and analysis to the Compensation Committee on the design, structure and level of executive and director compensation, and, when requested by the Compensation Committee, attends meetings of the Compensation Committee and participates in executive sessions without members of management present. Pay Governance reports directly to the Compensation Committee, and the Committee reviews, on an annual basis, Pay Governance’s performance and provides Pay Governance with direct feedback on its performance. Pay Governance also attends meetings of the Governance Committee with respect to nonemployee director compensation.

In 2011, Pay Governance did not perform any services for McDermott other than as described above.

Role of CEO and Management.    While the Compensation Committee has the responsibility to approve and monitor all compensation for our executive officers, management plays an important role in determining executive compensation. Management, at the request of the Compensation Committee, recommends financial goals and works with Pay Governance to analyze competitive market data and to recommend compensation levels for our executive officers. Our Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Johnson, likewise assists the Compensation Committee by providing his evaluation of the performance of our other executive officers and recommending compensation for those officers.

Overview of Compensation Elements

The following table summarizes the principal elements of our compensation program for our Named Executives, which we collectively refer to as “total direct compensation.”

Compensation ElementObjectiveKey Features

Annual Base Salary

To provide a fixed level of compensation that helps attract and retain executives

•   Salary level recognizes an executive officer’s experience, skill and performance, with the goal of being market competitive based on the officer’s role and responsibilities within the organization.

•   Adjustments may be made based on individual performance, inflation, pay relative to market and internal equity considerations.

•   This element is paid in cash.

Annual Incentive

To motivate and reward the achievement of short-term company performance

•   The Compensation Committee establishes an annual incentive bonus opportunity for each Named Executive at the beginning of the year.

•   The annual incentive aligns the Named Executives’ interests with McDermott’s short-term corporate strategies, and correlates pay with the achievement of short-term company goals.

•   To qualify for a payout, McDermott must achieve a predetermined performance threshold. Actual payouts to Named Executives are based on a combination of financial and individual performance factors, as well as other individual contributions throughout the year.

•   This element is paid in cash.

Long-Term Incentives

• incentivize executives through short- and long-term compensation opportunities that reward individual, company and, where applicable, segment performance;
 �� createTo motivate and increase shareholder value by:
• utilizing equity-based compensation with multi-year vesting schedules to closelyreward the achievement of long-term company performance (typically three or more years), align theexecutives’ interests of our executives with those of our shareholdersstockholders and retain executives

•   Long-term awards for our Named Executives in 2011 consisted of 50% performance shares, 25% stock options and 25% restricted stock units.

Performance Shares

•   Structured to be paid out in shares of McDermott common stock at the end of three-, four- and five-year performance periods to the extent applicable performance goals are met.

•   Performance goals are based on total stockholder return over the applicable performance period relative to McDermott’s peer group. Performance shares pay out at target if these goals are met, below target or not at all if the goals are not met, and above target if the goals are exceeded, up to 200% of the target award.

•   Intended to align the Named Executives’ interests with those of our stockholders with a focus on long-term results.

Stock Options

•   Structured to vest in one-third increments on the first, second and third anniversaries of the grant date.

•   Intended to strengthen the relationship between the long-term value of our stock price and the potential financial gain for our Named Executives, as the value of each stock option is realized on exercise only if our stock price increases from the date of grant.

Restricted Stock Units

•   Structured to be paid out in shares of McDermott common stock in one-third increments on the first, second and third anniversaries of the grant date.

•   Intended to encourage the retention of our executives; and

• structuring compensation contingentthe Named Executives as the restricted stock units vest based on reaching performance goals intended to reward performance by executives over annual and longer-term time horizons and in a manner that we believe creates shareholder value;continued employment with McDermott.

• manage fixed compensation costs through the use of performance and equity-based compensation; and
• reward continuity of service and individual contributions.
Elements.  With these objectives in mind, the

Defining Market Range Compensation Committee approves annual— Benchmarking

To identify median compensation for Named Executives principally consistingeach element of the following three compensation elements:

• annual base salary;
• annual bonus; and
• equity-based awards.
Collectively, these elements make up what we refer to as the “total direct compensation” of a Named Executive.
Annual base salary provides a fixed level of compensation that helps attract and retain highly qualified executives. Annual bonus and equity-based awards are principally variable components of a Named Executive’s compensation where a substantial amount of the compensation is performance-based. Compensation earned under these performance-based elements depends on the achievement of specific financial and, in the case of the annual bonus, individual performance goals established by the Compensation Committee and designed to support our business strategies and generate shareholder value. The annual bonus is the short-term component of compensation generally designed to incentivize a Named Executive to achieve performance goals relative to the then-current fiscal year. Equity-based compensation generally provides incentives to achieve performance goals over a period of three or more years. As we discuss in more detail below, the Compensation Committee also administers several plans as part of our post-employment compensation arrangements designed to reward long-term service and performance.


18


Relationship of Elements.  When making decisions as to the elements of a Named Executive’s total direct compensation, the Compensation Committee considers the dollar value of annual bonus and equity-based compensation, but typically awards these elements as percentages of annual base salary. This is primarily because our market generally targets these elements on apercentage-of-salary basis. See “— Total Direct Compensation — Equity-Based Compensation — Analysis of 2008 Equity Grants” below for a discussion of how equity grants are valued. Additionally, the Compensation Committee generally considers the entire amount of total direct compensation that is targeted for each Named Executive and the total amount of target cash-based compensation (annual base salary and annual bonus) for a Named Executive relative to the median target compensation for comparable executives in our market. The Compensation Committee’s goal is to establish target compensation for each element it considers appropriate to support the compensation objectives that, when combined, create a target total direct compensation award for each Named Executive that is reasonable and competitive.
Target Compensation.  The Compensation Committee targets the elements of total direct compensation for our Named Executives at or near the 50th percentile of compensation of comparable positions in our market. The Compensation Committee does not strive for a specific percentile of our market with respect to actual pay, rather it seeks to provide a target level of compensation for each element that falls within a range that it considers reasonable to provide competitive compensation — generally plus or minus 15% of the median of our market. The Compensation Committee, however, may deviate from the median of the market to account for a Named Executive’s performance and experience, market practices and other factors or situations that are not typically captured by looking at standard market practices and that the Compensation Committee deems relevant to the appropriateness and competitiveness of a Named Executive’s compensation. Because some elements of total direct compensation are variable, our Named Executives are capable of earning compensation above or below the target range for similarly situated executives in our market.
Defining our Market — Benchmarking.  The Compensation Committee principally relies on “benchmarking” —“benchmarking.” This involves reviewing the compensation of our Named Executives relative to the compensation paid to similarly situated executives at companies we consider to be our peerspeers. As a result, the annual base salary, target annual incentive compensation and target long-term incentive compensation as well as industry-specific survey data — to identify the 50th percentile of compensationa whole for each element. Performance goalsof the Named Executives is benchmarked. However, the specific performance metrics and performance levels used within elements of total directannual and long-term compensation are designed for the principal purpose of supporting our strategic and financial goalsand/or driving the creation of shareholderstockholder value, and, as a result, are not generally benchmarked. Benchmarking is an important, but not

Following the only, tool that providesengagement of Pay Governance as the Compensation Committee’s consultant in November 2010, Pay Governance reviewed the peer group the Compensation Committee uses for benchmarking at the Compensation Committee’s request and recommended revisions to the component companies. These suggested revisions were discussed and adopted by the Compensation Committee with some further revisions. At the direction of the Compensation Committee, Pay Governance compiled market data from two groups, the Proxy Peer Group and the Survey Group, as discussed below.

Proxy Peer Group.    Pay Governance utilized market data based on a pointset of reference to ensure that our target compensation is competitive among18 comparator companies (the “Proxy Peer Group”), identified through a screen of companies with whom we compete for business and executive talent.financial parity to McDermott. The component companies of the Proxy Peer Group are included on page 42 of this CD&A. The Proxy Peer Group was used as the primary reference point for the Named Executives, with the exception of Mr. Carlson, due to the lack of proxy information on his position. With the exception of market data provided in connection with Mr. McCormack’s promotion to Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer (“EVP, COO”), market data from the Proxy Peer Group represented 2009 compensation, as reported in 2010 proxy statements for the fiscal year ended 2009, and is not size-adjusted. The market data provided from the Proxy Peer Group in connection with Mr. McCormack’s promotion to EVP, COO represented 2010 compensation, as reported in 2011 proxy statements for the fiscal year ended 2010.

Survey Peer Group.    Pay Governance also utilized market data based on a set of 99 companies in similar industries which participate in Towers Watson surveys (the “Survey Peer Group”). The Survey Peer Group is intended to provide a reference point for pay levels within similar industries. Aside from screening companies on the basis of their industry classifications, no further refinements or judgments were applied in the identification of companies within the sample. The component companies of the Survey Peer Group are included on page 42 of this CD&A. The Survey Peer Group was used as a secondary reference for the Named Executives, with the exception of Mr. Carlson, for whom it was used as a primary reference. Market data from the Survey Peer Group represents 2010 compensation as reported to the survey and, when possible, size adjusted. Corporate positions, including that of Mr. Carlson, were evaluated based on both expected 2011 revenues of $3.4 billion and a longer-term objective of $5 billion in annual revenues, and business unit positions were evaluated based on their respective profit and loss levels.

In this CD&A references to “market” or “our market” are references to the compensation of executives at companies within the Proxy Peer Group for each Named Executive with the exception of Mr. Carlson, and the Survey Peer Group for Mr. Carlson.

Target Total Direct Compensation

The Compensation Committee requested Hewittseeks to conductprovide reasonable and competitive compensation. As a market compensation analysis and provide advice regardingresult, it targets the three elements of total direct compensation for our elected officers, including the Named Executives. Using survey data from its proprietary compensation database and other publicly available data, Hewitt collected information from companiesExecutives generally reflecting the size, scope and complexitywithin approximately 15% of the business and executive talent at McDermott. To account for the sizemedian compensation of our operations, Hewitt used regression analysis to adjust the market information based on revenue. To account for the diversity of geography and industry among our operations, Hewitt analyzed information from two principal groups, the J. Ray/Corporate Group and the Babcock & Wilcox Group. Incomparable positions. Throughout this CD&A, unless the context indicates otherwise, our “market” means the J. Ray/Corporate Group discussed below.


19


• J.Ray/Corporate Group.  With assistance from our management, Hewitt compiled this group as the primary benchmark for our executives at our corporate and Offshore Oil and Gas Construction segments, both of which are headquartered in Houston, Texas. The group consists of 48 companies with operations in engineering, construction, government operationsand/or energy. The median 2007 revenue of companies in this group was $4.8 billion. The component companies of this group include:
Alliant Techsystems Inc.
Ameron International Corp.
Anadarko Petroleum Corp.
Baker Hughes, Inc.
BJ Services Company
Cameron International, Inc.
Chesapeake Energy Corp.
Chicago Bridge & Iron Co.
Cooper Industries Ltd.
Curtiss-Wright Corporation
Devon Energy Corporation
Dover Corporation
Eaton Corporation
El Paso Corporation
EOG Resources, Inc.
ESCO Technologies, Inc.
Flowserve Corporation
FMC Technologies, Inc.
Foster Wheeler Ltd.
General Dynamics Corp.
Granite Construction, Inc.
Gulf Island Fabrication Inc.
Halliburton Company
Honeywell International, Inc.
Hubbell, Inc.
Illinois Tool Works Inc.
Ingersoll-Rand Co. Ltd.
ITT Corp.
Joy Global, Inc.
KBR Inc.
Lockheed Martin Corporation
Martin Marietta Materials, Inc.
Noble Corporation
Northrop Grumman Corporation
Parker-Hannifin Corporation
Pioneer Natural Resources Co.
Raytheon Company
Rockwell Collins, Inc.
Shaw Group, Inc.
Terex Corporation
Textron Inc.
Thomas & Betts Corporation
USG Corporation
Valmont Industries, Inc.
Vulcan Materials Company
Walter Industries, Inc.
Washington Group International Inc.
Williams Cos. Inc.
• Babcock & Wilcox Group.  With assistance from our management, Hewitt compiled this group as the primary benchmark for our executives at our Power Generation Systems and Government Operations segments. The group is a subset of the J.Ray/Corporate Group and consists of 33 engineering, constructionand/or governments operations companies that are more specifically representative of our Power Generation Systems and Government Operations segments. The median 2007 revenue of companies in this group was $7.3 billion. The component companies within this group include:
Alliant Techsystems, Inc.
Ameron International Corp.
Chicago Bridge & Iron Co.
Cooper Industries Ltd.
Curtiss-Wright Corporation
Dover Corporation
Eaton Corporation
ESCO Technologies, Inc.
Flowserve Corporation
Foster Wheeler Ltd.
General Dynamics Corp.
Granite Construction, Inc.
Honeywell International, Inc.
Hubbell, Inc.
Illinois Tool Works Inc.
Ingersoll-Rand Co. Ltd.
ITT Corporation
Joy Global, Inc.
Lockheed Martin Corporation
Martin Marietta Materials, Inc.
Northrop Grumman Corp.
Parker-Hannifin Corporation
Raytheon Company
Rockwell Collins, Inc.
Shaw Group, Inc.
Terex Corporation
Textron, Inc.
Thomas & Betts Corporation
USG Corporation
Valmont Industries, Inc.
Vulcan Materials Co.
Walter Industries Inc.
Washington Group International Inc.


20


In addition, Hewitt supplements the market data with compensation information related to companies in a peer group identified by management and Hewitt in October 2007, which we refer to compensation that is within approximately 15% of market median as “market range” compensation.

The Compensation Committee may set elements of total direct compensation above or below the “Custom Peer Group.” The Custom Peer Group consists of nine similarly situated engineeringmarket range to account for a Named Executive’s performance and construction companiesexperience, internal equity and is the same group we used in the performance graph included in our annual report onForm 10-K. For 2007, the median revenue of the companies in the Custom Peer Group was $5.5 billion. Compensation information for the Custom Peer Group companies was based on information reportedother factors or situations that are not typically captured by those companies in publicly available Securitieslooking at standard market data and Exchange Commission filings. The information available was largely limited to the five highest paid positions at the companypractices and generally based on 2006 compensation. As a result,that the Compensation Committee relieddeems relevant to the appropriateness and/or competitiveness of a Named Executive’s compensation.

When making decisions regarding individual compensation elements, the Compensation Commit-

tee also considers the effect on the J.Ray/Corporate GroupNamed Executive’s target total direct compensation and the Babcock & Wilcox Grouptarget total cash-based compensation (annual base salary and annual incentives), as the primary benchmarksapplicable. Our Compensation Committee’s goal is to define the market and determine 2008establish target compensation for our elected officers, including the Named Executives.

For more information regarding the Compensation Committee’s consultant and the role of the consultant and executive management in executive compensation, see the discussion under “Corporate Governance — Board of Directors and Its Committees — Compensation Committee.”
Total Direct Compensation
2008 Overview.  Totaleach element that, when combined, create a target total direct compensation award for each Named Executive that is built aroundreasonable and competitive and supports the Company’s compensation philosophy and objectives.

2011 Overview.    The 2011 target total direct compensation for each of our philosophyNamed Executives was within the market range of targetingtarget total direct compensation, except for Mr. Johnson and Mr. Nesser. The target total direct compensation for

Mr. Johnson was set above market medianrange due to Mr. Johnson’s demonstrated leadership as Chief Executive Officer following the Spin-off. The target total direct compensation with significant incentive components that reflect positive, as well as negative, company and individual performance. for Mr. Nesser was set below market range due to no long-term incentives being provided to him in advance of his anticipated retirement.

The chart below shows for each element ofthe 2011 target total direct compensation by element for each Named Executive. Because the targetamount of compensation actually paid through the Compensation Committee sought to deliver to ourcompensation elements that are performance-based is not fixed at the outset, Named Executives may earn compensation above or below the market range for similarly situated executives in 2008.our market.

 

2008 McDermott2011 Target Total Direct Compensation Summary

             
  Annual Base Salary
  Annual Bonus
  Equity
 
Named Executive
 ($)  (% of Salary)  (% of Salary) 
 
J.A. Fees            
CEO, McDermott International, Inc.  $750,000   100%  671%
CEO, The Babcock & Wilcox Company $540,000   70%  285%
Composite* $592,500   79%  671%
B.W. Wilkinson $750,000   100%  0%
M.S. Taff $440,000   55%  261%
B.C. Bethards            
CEO, The Babcock & Wilcox Company $526,200   70%  203%
President, B&W Power Generation Group, Inc.  $409,500   60%  160%
Composite* $438,675   63%  203%
R.A. Deason $540,000   70%  235%
J.T. Nesser, III            
COO, J. Ray McDermott, S.A.  $500,000   70%  390%
CALO, MII $500,000   65%  240%
Composite* $500,000   66%  390%

Named Executive  

Annual

Base Salary

  

Annual
Incentive(1)

(% of Salary)

 

Long-Term

Incentive(2)

  Target Total
Direct
Compensation as
Percent of
Market(3)
 Percent
Performance-
Based(4)

S. M. Johnson

  $950,000   100% $4,000,000   117% 67%

P. L. Elders

  $485,000   70% $1,000,000   86% 60%

G. L. Carlson

  $336,000   60% $416,720   112% 54%

L. K. Hinrichs

  $440,000   60% $931,767   103% 59%

J. T. McCormack(5)

      

EVP, COO

  $500,000   70% $1,125,000   73% 59%

SVP, Operations

  $400,000   50% $465,000   106% 51%

J. T. Nesser

  $512,508   70%     83% 41%

Average Mix of Compensation Elements(6)

   22%   17%  61%   N/A 60%

(1)When making decisions as to the elements of a Named Executive’s total direct compensation, the Compensation Committee considers the dollar value of annual incentive compensation but typically awards this element as percentages of annual base salary. This is primarily because our market generally targets annual incentive on a percentage-of-salary basis.

*(2)The composite values shown for Messrs. Fees, Bethards and Nesser represent a compositeprovided in this column are the target compensationvalues of each person because eachlong-term incentives approved by the Compensation Committee. For more information on the grant date fair values of these Named Executives held more than one position in 2008. The composite values reported under the “Annual Base Salary” and “Annual Bonus” columns reflect the prorated compensation targeted for each person under his current and former position. For a discussion of how the composite target annual bonus amounts were calculated,long-term incentives, see the Grants“Grants of Plan-Based AwardsAwards” table under “Compensation of Executive Officers” belowbelow.

(3)Market = Median annual base salary, based on the benchmark applicable to the executive. 100% represents median compensation.

(4)With the exception of Mr. Nesser, performance-based compensation consists of a Named Executive’s annual incentive and the disclosures under “Compensation of Executive Officers — Estimated Possible Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards” below. The composite values reported under the “Equity” column, however, represent the targeted amounts of equity awarded in 2008 as percentages75% of the respectivetarget value of long-term incentives, representing that portion of long-term incentive compensation attributable to performance shares and stock options. For Mr. Nesser, performance-based compensation consists only of Mr. Nesser’s annual incentive, as he was not granted long-term incentive compensation in 2011 in anticipation of his retirement by year-end 2011.

(5)In connection with Mr. McCormack’s promotion to EVP, COO on June 30, 2011, Mr. McCormack’s annual base salariessalary and annual incentive compensation target were increased. Additionally, Mr. McCormack received a supplemental long-term incentive award with a target value of these executives as$660,000, which, when combined with the long-term incentive award of October 1, 2008 under their current positions. See “— Annual Base Salary,” “— Annual Bonus” and “— Equity-Based Compensation” below for a detailed discussion$465,000 granted to him in March 2011, resulted in total long-term incentives of each element.$1,125,000.


21


(6)The values provided for the average mix of compensation elements do not include Mr. McCormack’s target compensation pertaining to his former position or Mr. Nesser’s target compensation.

While we dothe Compensation Committee does not set a specific target allocation among the elements of total direct compensation, elements, the Compensation Committeeit believes that equity-based and performance-based compensation relate most directly to achievementa significant portion of strategic and financial goals and to building shareholder value and, as a result, should represent a majority of theNamed Executive’s total direct compensation should be performance-based. As shown above, excluding Mr. McCormack’s target compensation from his former position and Mr. Nesser’s target compensation, on average, performance-based compensation accounted for approximately 60% of a Named Executive. On average, about 83% of the 2008Executive’s 2011 target total direct compensation and 75% of our Named Executives (excluding Mr. Wilkinson) washis or her long-term incentive compensation, representing that portion of long-term incentive compensation attributable to target annual bonusperformance shares and equity-based compensation. stock options.

Annual Base Salary

The remainder of a Named Executive’s target total direct compensation for 2008 was from annual2011 base salary. On average, the 2008 mix of target total direct compensation elementssalaries for our Named Executives, excluding Mr. Wilkinson, waswhich reflect increases that became effective as follows:

2008 Named Executive Target Total Direct Compensation (Average)
(PIE CHART)
Mr. Wilkinson, who had servedof April 1, 2011, were as our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer since 2000, announced his intention to retire from McDermott in February 2008 and retired on September 30, 2008. As a result, he did not receive any equity award in 2008. Without any equity, only 50% of his 2008 target total direct compensation was attributable to “at-risk” incentive compensation. Because of his retirement, Mr. Wilkinson is uniquely situated compared to the other Named Executives with respect to compensation and, unless otherwise stated in this CD&A, the analysis provided for Named Executives as a group excludes Mr. Wilkinson.
Annual Base Salary
2008 Salaries.  Annualfollows:

Named Executive 

2011 Annual

Base Salary

  Percent
Increase
 Percent of
Market(1)

S. M. Johnson

 $950,000   3.26% 106%

P.L. Elders

 $485,000   3.19% 105%

G. L. Carlson

 $336,000   5.00% 105%

L. K. Hinrichs

 $440,000   4.19% 114%

J. T. McCormack

   

EVP, COO

 $500,000   N/A 81%

SVP, Operations

 $400,000   3.09% 110%

J. T. Nesser

 $512,508   0.00% 100%

(1)Market = Median annual base salary, based on the benchmark applicable to the executive. 100% represents median compensation.

When considering base salary is the fixed component of total direct compensation whichsalaries effective April 1, 2011, the Compensation Committee reviews annually. Our Board of Directors reviewssought to set salaries within the base salaries of our elected officers at the request of the Compensation Committee. With respect to 2008 salaries, our Board of Directors approved the salaries of our elected officers, including our Named Executives, as approved by the Compensation Committee.

In January 2008, Hewitt providedmarket range. Accordingly, the Compensation Committee with an analysis of total direct compensation for our elected officers, includingset annual base salaries within market range for each Named Executive, indicatingwith year-over-year increases ranging from 0-5%.

In May 2011, in consideration of the median compensation targeted by compensation element for similarly situated executives in our market. Additionally, Hewitt presented the separate recommendations of Hewitt and our Chief Executive Officer as to 2008 base salaries and Hewitt’s market analysis of target cash compensation based on proposed annual salaries and bonus amounts. After reviewing the recommendations and market information, the Compensation Committee set 2008 base salaries for Messrs. Fees and Nesser at or within 4% above the median salaries of comparable positions in our market as indicated by their applicable benchmark. In January 2008, Mr. Fees and Mr. Deason were each serving as the Chief Executive Officer of one of our two principal operating subsidiaries. As a result of internal equity considerations, the Compensation Committee set the same base salary for Mr. Fees and Mr. Deason, although market data indicated that Mr. Deason’s salary was approximately 16% above the median — a result due to the use of different benchmarks for these positions. The Compensation Committee approved a base salary for Mr. Taff that was 10% higher than his prior salary, but was approximately 18% below the median salaries for chief financial officers in our market, having considered that Mr. Taff received an increase in compensation as a result of his then-recent promotion to Chief Financial Officer in 2007. The 2008 salary for Mr. Bethards, who at the time served as President of our subsidiary Babcock & Wilcox Power Generation Group, Inc., or B&W PGG, represented a 5% increase and was approximately 12% above the median salary for his position in our market. Mr. Wilkinson’s 2008 salary remained unchanged from 2007. As a result, his 2008 salary was about 32% below the median base salary indicated by the applicable benchmark.


22


The Compensation Committee asked Hewitt to provide further market compensation analysis for selected positionsand recommendation provided by Pay Governance in connection with the October 1, 2008 promotions of Messrs. Fees, Bethards and Nesser. After reviewing the analysis and the separate recommendations of Hewitt and our Chief Executive Officer for each position,Mr. McCormack’s June 30, 2011 promotion to EVP, COO, the Compensation Committee increased Mr. Bethards’ annualMcCormack’s base salary to $526,200, which equaled the median$500,000 effective June 30, 2011. The Compensation Committee approved this slightly below market salary for his position in our market. Basedbased on Mr. Nesser’s skills andMcCormack’s relative experience as well as the change in responsibility from corporate and legal focus to an operations focus, and on consideration of survey data of our market and our Custom Peer Group, the Compensation Committee considered Mr. Nesser’s base salary competitive forwith his new

position and his salary remained unchanged. Our Boardin light of Directors set Mr. Fees’ base salaryinternal pay equity considerations.

Annual Incentive Compensation

2011 Overview and other compensation at the time of his appointment. In setting Mr. Fees’ annual base salary as Chief Executive Officer, our Board of Directors considered a number of market practices and other factors regarding internal chief executive officer promotions highlighted by Hewitt, including the following:

• that individual circumstances have produced a wide range of pay practices in the market;
• the historical pay of our Chief Executive Officer;
• that it is typical for new chief executive officer pay to trail the market for a short period; and
• that although Mr. Fees serves as a director of our Board, he is not serving as Chairman.
As a result, our Board increased Mr. Fees’ base salary as Chief Executive Officer to match Mr. Wilkinson’s prior salary of $750,000, although this salary was approximately 32% below the median salary for chief executive officers in our market.
Annual BonusTarget Compensation
2008 Overview..    The Compensation Committee administers our short-termannual incentive compensation program under our Executive Incentive Compensation Plan which we refer to as the EICP. For 2008, the Compensation Committee authorized separate discretionary bonus payments in addition to the amounts paid under the EICP. See “— Analysis of 2008 Discretionary Awards” below for more information regarding the discretionary payments.
(the “EICP”).

The EICP is a cash bonusincentive plan designed to motivate and reward our Named Executives and other key employees for their contributions to business goals and other factors that we believe drive our earningsand/or create shareholder and promote creation of stockholder value.

The payment amount, if any,target 2011 EICP compensation for our Named Executives was as follows:

Named Executive  Target EICP
(% of annual
base salary)
 Percent  of
Market(1)

S. M. Johnson

  100% 102%

P. L. Elders

  70% 87%

G. L. Carlson

  60% 121%

L. K. Hinrichs

  60% 85%

J. T. McCormack(2)

   

EVP, COO

  70% 71%

SVP, Operations

  50% 113%

J. T. Nesser

  70% 67%

(1)Market = Median target annual incentive compensation, based on the benchmark applicable to the executive. 100% represents median compensation.

(2)Mr. McCormack’s target EICP was prorated based on his length of service at his current and former positions.

The 2011 target EICP for Messrs. Johnson, Elders and Nesser remained unchanged from their respective 2010 targets. Mr. Carlson’s and Ms. Hinrichs’ respective targets were each increased to 60% of an EICP award is determined based on: (1) the attainment of short-term financial goals; (2) the attainment of short-term individual goals; and (3) the exercise of the Compensation Committee’s discretionary authority. The EICP award is generally expressed as a percentage of the Named Executive’s annual base salary. For more information regarding the mechanics of the EICP and the 2008 award opportunities under the EICP, see the Grants of Plan-Based Awards table under “Compensation of Executive Officers” below and the disclosures under “Compensation of Executive Officers — Estimated Possible Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards.” In 2008,salary earned for 2011. This resulted in an above-market target for Mr. Carlson; however, the Compensation Committee requested that Hewitt assess our compensation programs with a specific focusdeemed this target appropriate based on internal pay equity considerations. Mr. McCormack’s 2011 target EICP was increased to 50% of annual base salary earned when the EICP. Based on the input received from Hewitt following that review,targets were set by the Compensation Committee determined thatin February 2011 based on internal pay equity considerations. The target was then increased to 70% in connection with his promotion to EVP, COO in June 2011 to bring his target EICP award closer to market range for his new position and based on internal pay equity considerations.

2011 EICP Performance Goals.    Traditionally, EICP compensation has consisted of a financial performance component and an individual performance component. To continue to drive performance of McDermott’s operations, the overall structure of our2011 EICP target compensation for officers, including the Named Executives, was also set utilizing financial and individual performance components. Generally, the 2011 target EICP was competitive for purposessplit between financial and individual components as follows:

70% of providing 2008 annual bonus compensation.target EICP was attributable to financial performance, of which 70% was attributable to operating income and 30% was attributable to return on invested capital; and

30% of target EICP was attributable to individual performance.

The

Financial performance is the largest factor in determining EICP compensation, because the Compensation Committee generally considers financial goalsit to be more objective and to more directly influence the creation of shareholderstockholder value, as compared to individual performance. Individual performance, however, serves as an important metric to help promote the achievement of strategic goals andthat may not be measured in an annual financial metric. To reward significant individual contributions, the exerciseCompensation Committee maintained the individual component for 2011 at 30% of target EICP for 2011. However, to maintain the emphasis on financial performance, payment of EICP compensation (including for individual performance) required the attainment of the threshold level of operating income financial performance. The maximum EICP compensation a Named Executive could earn in 2011 was a multiple of 2x target EICP. For all Named Executives, the Compensation Committee’s discretion. Committee had the discretion to decrease an EICP payment.

As a result, for each Named Executive the largest percentage of an EICP award is allocated topayment amount was principally determined based on: (1) the attainment of annual financial goals. With respect to our 2008 EICP awards, up to 170%goals; and (2) the attainment of a target award was attributable to financial performance relative toannual individual goals, as displayed below:

LOGO

2011 Financial Performance Goals.    Historically, the specific goals, while up to 30% was attributable to a Named Executive’s individual goals. The Compensation Committee may decrease an EICP award in its discretion and the maximum EICP award a Named Executive can earn is 200% of his target EICP award.

The 2008 financial goals consisted of a mix of McDermott, B&W and J. Ray operating income. Generally, EICP financial goals are based (1) entirely on our consolidated operating income for McDermott officers; (2) entirely on applicable segment operating income for officers of B&W and J. Ray, other than segment chief executive officers; and (3) on a mix of our consolidated operating income and J. Ray or B&W operating income for segment chief executive officers. The mix of consolidated and segment operating income relative to the 170% that


23


can be earned by a segment chief executive officer under an EICP award consists of approximately 70% segment and 30% consolidated operating income. The following charts illustrate the mix of consolidated and segment operating income goals for our 2008 EICP awards. See “— 2008 EICP Financial Goals” below for further analysis regarding our 2008 operating income goals.
2008 EICP Awards McDermott
2008 EICP Awards B&W/J. Ray CEO
(PIE CHART)(PIE CHART)
2008 EICP Awards B&W/J. Ray Non-CEO
(PIE CHART)
Following the October 1, 2008 promotions, the mix of McDermott, B&W and J. Ray financial goals changed for each of Messrs. Fees, Bethards and Nesser. As a result, each officer’s 2008 EICP consists of two of the above operating income goals, each prorated based on an October 1 transition date. For example, Mr. Fees’ 2008 target EICP was based on 75% of the goals for B&W/J. Ray CEO and 25% of the goals for McDermott.
In connection with setting the EICP award, the Compensation Committee establishes three levelsconsisted of operating income performance for determining the threshold, target and maximum payout under the financial component of an EICP award. The threshold level represents the minimum amount oflevels related to McDermott and/or business unit operating income that must be earned before any amount of compensation is paid under the financial component of an EICP award. Priorrelevant to 2008, the Compensation Committee believed that no amount should be paid under an EICP award for financial performance if operating income results are below 85% of the target level. Accordingly, it set the 2007 threshold level operating income goals at 85% of target. For 2008 EICP awards, the Compensation Committee set ambitious financial performance goals. As a result, the Compensation Committee changed the operating income goal at the threshold level from 85% to 75% of the target level to allow for a payout at performance levels that it expected would contribute to the creation of significant shareholder value.
2008 EICP Target Awards.  The Compensation Committee set the amount of target 2008 EICP awards for alleach Named Executives, including Mr. Wilkinson but excluding Mr. Taff, at or near the median annual incentive award targeted by our market for similarly situated executives. The Compensation Committee determined the median annual incentive award target for our market as a percentage of median annual base salary for our market (rather than the median dollar amount of the awards targeted by our market). With regard to Mr. Taff, after considering his 2007 promotion to Chief Financial Officer as discussed above under “— Annual Base Salary,” the Compensation Committee increased his 2008 target EICP award to 55% from 45% in 2007. As a percentage of annual base salary, Mr. Taff’s 2008 target EICP award was approximately 21% below the median target annual bonus (as a percentage of median annual base salary) for chief financial officers in our market. Otherwise, the 2008 EICP target awards, as a percentage of annual base salary, for


24


our other Named Executives were all within 15% of the median target annual cash incentive awards (as a percentage of median annual base salary) for comparable positions indicated by our benchmarks. Mr. Fees’ target award as Chief Executive Officer was increased to match Mr. Wilkinson’s target award, which was approximately 10% below the median award for chief executive officers in our market. The 2008 EICP target awards were set as follows:
2008 Target EICP
Target EICP
Named Executive
(% of Annual Base Salary)
J.A. Fees — CEO, MII100%
J.A. Fees — CEO, B&W70%
B.W. Wilkinson100%
M.S. Taff55%
B.C. Bethards — CEO, B&W70%
B.C. Bethards — Pres., B&W PGG60%
R.A. Deason70%
J.T. Nesser, III — COO, J. Ray70%
J.T. Nesser, III — CALO, MII65%
2008 EICP Financial Goals.  For the 2008 EICP awards, the Compensation Committee set financial goals based uponyear-over-year increases in our consolidated and, where applicable, segment operating income.Executive. The Compensation Committee considers operating income an appropriate financial measure to use for this purpose,compensation purposes because it believes it is the primary driver of net income, which itthe Compensation Committee expects to drive our stock price. In comparison to net income, however, operating income is more directly influenced by the revenues generated and costs incurred as a result of management action,action. In 2011, operating income comprised 70% of the financial performance component of a Named Executive’s target EICP award.

In 2011, the Compensation Committee added return on invested capital, or ROIC, as an additional financial performance metric under the EICP. The Compensation Committee considers ROIC an appropriate financial measure to use for compensation purposes because it is an indicator of McDermott’s capital efficiency and is more readily attributableproductivity. ROIC also incentivizes the management of assets, and aligns management’s interest with those of our stockholders by measuring stockholder value creation and/or erosion when compared to our operating segments.the cost of capital. ROIC comprised 30% of the financial performance component of a Named Executive’s target EICP award for 2011.

 

The consolidated and segmentCompensation Committee established three primary levels of operating income and ROIC goals, which together would determine the threshold, target and maximum amounts that would be paid under the financial performance component of the EICP. In establishing the target level, the Compensation Committee considered management’s internal estimates of operating income and ROIC, discussed those estimates with Mr. Johnson, and then set the target level and threshold and maximum levels as a percentage of the target level. The Compensation Committee designs incentive compensation to drive target level performance and does not believe that compensation should be earned for performance substantially below that level. As a result, no EICP compensation would be earned (including for individual performance) unless the threshold level of operating income financial performance was attained, irrespective of the level of ROIC attained. The Compensation Committee believes that Named

Executives should be rewarded for superior financial performance. It therefore establishes a maximum level performance goal to incentivize higher performance, but caps the payout to maximize returns to stockholders for performance above the maximum payout level.

For other levels of operating income and ROIC between threshold and maximum, the percentage paid would be determined by linear interpolation using the two neighboring pre-established performance levels and payout as a multiple of target award. No payment would have been earned under the EICP for 2011 if operating income results had been below the threshold level, notwithstanding the ROIC performance level.

A Named Executive would have been eligible to earn the following amounts under the 2011 EICP based on attaining the following levels of operating income and ROIC:

2011 EICP Payout Matrix

    Performance
Goal
 

Consolidated
Operating
Income

(in millions)

  

Payout(1)

(as a multiple
of target
EICP award)

     Performance
Goal
 Consolidated
ROIC
 

Payout(2)

(as a multiple of
target EICP
award)

  >120% >$420  2.00    >120% >16.7% 2.00

Maximum

  120% $420  2.00    120% 16.7% 2.00
  110% $385  1.50    110% 15.3% 1.50

Target

  100% $350  1.00    100% 13.9% 1.00
  90% $315  0.75    97% 13.4% 0.75
  80% $280  0.50    93% 12.9% 0.50

Threshold

  70% $256  0.25    90% 12.4% 0.25
  < 70% <$245  0.00    <90% <12.4% 0.00

(1)The Payout for consolidated operating income is a multiple of target EICP award with respect to the 70% portion of financial performance goals attributable to operating income.

(2)The Payout for consolidated ROIC is a multiple of target EICP award with respect to the 30% portion of financial goals attributable to ROIC.

2011 Individual Performance Goals.    Individual goals established for each Named Executive were tailored to the individual’s position and focused on supporting strategic initiatives and achieving common goals. Mr. Johnson’s individual goals were established by the Compensation Committee. Each Named Executive, with the exception of Messrs. Johnson and

Nesser, proposed their respective individual goals, which were approved by Mr. Johnson. No individual goals were established for Mr. Nesser in light of his anticipated retirement by year-end 2011. The individual goals for our Continuing Named Executives’ 2011 EICP compensation are set forth in the 2008 EICP awards were as follows:table on the following page.

 
ThresholdTargetMaximum
The Babcock & Wilcox Company —
•   Power Generation Systems Segment
$225.0 million$300.0 million$320.0 million
•   Government Operations Segment
J. Ray McDermott —
•   Offshore Oil & Gas Construction Segment
$318.7 million$425.0 million$451.0 million
McDermott International —
•   Consolidated(1)
$511.5 million$682.0 million$750.0 million

(1)

Stephen M. Johnson:

Consolidated operating income levels equal the sum of the segment operating income less unallocated corporate operating expenses.
In determining the specific levels of operating income, the Compensation Committee believes that the target and maximum goals should be set at levels that, if achieved, are likely to produce reasonable and above-average value for shareholders, respectively, but that also have reasonable probabilities of achievement, relative to the payout, so as to provide a meaningful incentive to employees. The Compensation Committee set the 2008 target goal in February 2008 based on management’s internal estimates of 2008 operating income and set the 2008 maximum goal at a “stretch” operating income level for 2008. The Compensation Committee considered the attainment of the stretch goal to be significantly less probable than the target goal but, at twice the payout, it provided considerable additional incentive to encourage profitable growth. At the consolidated entity level, the target and maximum financial goals represented approximately 7% and 18%year-over-year increases from an adjusted 2007 consolidated operating income, respectively. Our 2007 GAAP operating income results were adjusted down by approximately $80 million for purposes of this comparison for one-time settlements on projects. As discussed under “— Annual Bonus — 2008 Overview” above, the operating income goals at the threshold levels were set at 75% of target.


25


2008 EICP Individual Goals.  As discussed above under “— 2008 Overview” above, collectively the individual goals represent 0-30% of each Named Executive’s EICP award. The individual goals and their respective weightings for our Named Executives’ 2008 EICP awards were set as follows:
For John A. Fees, as our Chief Executive Officer:
 

•    

successfully execute transition plan developedLead the Company and set a philosophy that is well understood, widely supported, consistently applied and effectively implemented;

•    Establish a clearly-articulated and executable strategy for the Company which conserves cash and leverages capital expenditures in a conservative manner;

•    Establish appropriate annual and long-term financial objectives; ensure that appropriate systems are maintained to protect assets and maintain effective control of operations;

•    Develop, attract, retain, motivate and supervise an effective top management team capable of achieving objectives; provide for executive management succession planning;

•    Serve as the chief spokesperson for the Company, communicating effectively with shareholders and stakeholders;

•    Work closely with the Board of Directors (0-30%).to keep them fully informed on all important aspects of the Company; make timely recommendations for Board action and respond to suggestions and directives from the Board and its committees;

•    Achieve specific safety goals and objectives and promote safe work practices as the highest operational priority; and

•    Assure that all operations and business dealings are conducted with the utmost compliance with applicable laws and regulations and the highest level of ethical behavior is exhibited by the Company.

For John A. Fees, as Chief Executive Officer of B&W:

Perry L. Elders:

•    

achieve specific levelsConvert the capital allocation, management reporting, revenue pipeline and estimating methodology from project initiatives into recurring processes;

•    Build a high performing finance team, including succession and development planning as well as implement development plans including changing duties of health, safetycertain individuals;

•    Form a capital team to oversee and environmental performance averages at our Power Generation Systemsmanage the capital allocation and Government Operations segments (0-10%);authorization process as well as identify and evaluate sources of capital;

•    Assess and optimize cash investments;

•    Establish balance sheet forecasts, improve annual budget process, establish operating unit level invested capital calculations to drive ROIC reporting; and

•    Assist the CEO and executive management with developing a new culture within the Company.

 • implement identified strategic initiatives (0-10%); and
• develop a strategic consolidation strategy for a specific business function at The Babcock & Wilcox Company (0-10%).
For Bruce W. Wilkinson:

Gary L. Carlson:

•    

achieve specific levels of company-wide health, safetyDesign and environmentalimplement a global employee classification scheme;

•    Deploy talent development and succession planning program to the project organization including discrete, measurable, and time sensitive candidate development plans;

•    Design and implement a global career development and performance averages (0-10%);management program;

•    Close the Third Country National pension plan to new participants and freeze benefit accruals thereunder, and establish a new defined contribution plan for non-U.S. expatriates;

•    Design a comprehensive mobilization program revision road map; and

•    Establish a comprehensive information technology plan and governance model, and complete the 2011 information technology initiatives on time and within budget.

Liane K. Hinrichs:

•    

receive a positive assessment byLead the legal group through post Spin-off reorganization;

•    Work with the Board of Directors regarding six performance categories selected byand management to continue enhancements to the Board of Directors (0-20%).ERM program; and

•    Lead the review, analysis and response to any significant changes in compliance requirements.

For Michael S. Taff:

John T. McCormack:

• assess and modify McDermott’s liquidity position as approved by the Chief Executive Officer/Finance Committee (0-10%);
 

•    

define McDermottAchieve specific safety goals and objectives;

•    Achieve specific levels of financial planningperformance with respect to operating income, return on invested capital and analysis activitiesnew bookings;

•    Provide for 2008 (0-10%);executive management succession planning; and

•    

develop a plan to mitigate defined benefit plan liabilities (0-10%).
For Brandon C. Bethards, as Chief Executive Officer of B&W:
• effect a successful transition asImprove communications among the Chief Executive Officer, of B&W (0-30%).
For Brandon C. Bethards, as President of Babcock & Wilcox Power Generation Group, Inc.:
• achieve specific levels of health, safetyChief Operating Officer, McDermott operations personnel and environmental performance averages for B&W PGG (0-10%);
• develop a strategic plan for B&W PGG in North America (0-10%);
• identify strategic international growth strategies for B&W PGG (0-5%); and
• record specified amount of royalties and license fees (0-5%).
For Robert A. Deason:
• achieve specific levels of health, safety and environmental performance averages at our Offshore Oil and Gas Construction segment (0-10%); and
• commence implementing diversified strategies for our Offshore Oil and Gas Construction segment in connection with McDermott’s strategic five-year plan (0-20%).
For John T. Nesser, III, as our Chief Administrative and Legal Officer:
• achieve specific levels of company-wide health, safety and environmental performance averages (0-10%);
• design and prepare new strategic compensation program (0-10%); and
• complete a targeted risk assessment (0-10%).customers.


26


20082011 Annual BonusIncentive Compensation Payments.The 20082011 target and final EICP awardcompensation amounts as well as the discretionary awards paid tofor each Named Executive are shown in the table below.

20082011 EICP AND DISCRETIONARY AWARDS SUMMARYPayment Summary

                         
Named
 2008 EICP Target  2008 EICP Actual  2008 Discretionary
  Total 2008 Annual
 
Executive
 % of Salary  $ Amount  $ Amount  % of Salary  Award  Bonus Awards 
 
J.A. Fees  79% $471,000  $570,803(1)  96% $270,223  $841,026 
B.W. Wilkinson  100% $750,000  $323,550(2)  43% $0  $323,550 
M.S. Taff  55% $242,000  $141,207   32% $110,000  $251,207 
B.C. Bethards  63% $276,360  $509,298(1)  116% $10,000  $519,298 
R.A. Deason  70% $378,000  $0(3)  0% $0  $0 
J.T. Nesser, III  66% $331,250  $136,122(1)  27% $100,000  $236,122 

Named Executive 2011 EICP
Target
% of Salary
  

Final
2011

Annual
Incentive

 

S. M. Johnson

 100%  $0  

P. L. Elders

   70%  $0  

G. L. Carlson

   60%  $0  

L. K. Hinrichs

   60%  $0  

J. T. McCormack(1)

   

EVP, COO

   70%  

SVP, Operations

   50%  $0  

J. T. Nesser

   70%  $206,408  

(1)The 2008Mr. McCormack’s target EICP awards for Messrs. Fees, Bethards and Nesser represent composites of EICP awards earned under their respective current and former positions, as follows:
• Mr. Fees’ award represents three-fourths of the award he earned as Chief Executive Officer of B&W and one-fourth of the award he earned as Chief Executive Officer of MII;
• Mr. Bethards’ award represents three-fourths of the award he earned as President of B&W PGG and one-fourth of the award he earned as Chief Executive Officer of B&W; and
• Mr. Nesser’s award represents three-fourths of the award he earned as Chief Administrative and Legal Officer of MII and one-fourth of the award he earned as Chief Operating Officer of J. Ray.
(2)Under the terms of Mr. Wilkinson’s separation agreement, his 2008 EICP award was prorated based on thehis length of service at his employment during 2008. As a result, his total 2008 EICP award represents three-fourths of $431,400, the amount he would have earned for the full year based on the level of attainment of financialcurrent and individual goals.
(3)As further discussed below, Mr. Deason declined any bonus payment for 2008.former positions.

Analysis of 20082011 EICP Payments.Payments.    In February 2009, our Chief Executive Officer presented2012, the Compensation Committee with anconsidered (1) McDermott’s 2011 consolidated operating income and ROIC; (2) Mr. Johnson’s self-assessment of his individual performance relative to his individual goals; (3) the nonemployee directors’ assessment regardingof the individual performance of Mr. Johnson; and (4) Mr. Johnson’s recommendation of each other Continuing Named Executive’s 2011 EICP compensation based on his assessment of the financial and individual performance goals applicable to each of thethose Continuing Named Executives, together with his recommendation for each Named Executive’s 2008 EICP award.

Financial Component Payment:  Financial performance accounted for 85% of each Named Executive’s target 2008 EICP award or, depending on the performance achieved, 0-170% of the final EICP award amount. As discussed above,Executives.

In order to determine whether the financial goals consisted ofwere attained, the Compensation Committee utilized McDermott’s consolidatedand/or segment operating income, goals with three performance levels that determined threshold, target and maximum payments. Operating income atwhich was slightly above the threshold level would produce a payout of 25%$245.0 million, and consolidated ROIC of the target EICP award attributable to financial goals. Operating income at the target and maximum levels would produce a payout of 100% and 200%8%, respectively, of the target EICP award attributable to financial goals. The percentage paid out between threshold and maximum is interpolated. No payment would be made under the financial component if the level of operating income earned was below the applicable threshold level.

The Compensation Committee considered our 2008 GAAP consolidated and segment operating income in light of the established operating income goals. McDermott earned approximately $570 million of consolidated operating income in 2008, which exceeded the threshold goal but not the target goal and resulted in a 51% payout on the financial component related to consolidated operating income goals. At least part of the financial component of the 2008 EICP award for all Named Executives (including Mr. Wilkinson) was based on consolidated operating income results. As a result, all six Named Executives earned 51% of that portion of the target financial component that was tied to consolidated operating income. B&W earned over $450 million of operating income, which exceeded its maximum level and resulted in a 200% payout on the financial component related to B&W operating


27


income goals. The EICP award for each of Mr. Fees, particularly for the portion attributable to his service as Chief Executive Officer of B&W, and Mr. Bethards contain financial goals based on B&W stand-alone operating income results. As a result, Messrs. Fees and Bethards earned 200% of that portion of their respective target EICP award. Finally, J. Ray earned approximately $140 million of operating income, which amount was below the threshold level of 12.4%. The consolidated ROIC percentage was derived by dividing (1) the sum of income from continuing operations before noncontrolling interest less net income attributable to noncontrolling interest by (2) the average net assets during 2011, which was calculated by subtracting current liabilities from total assets. The consolidated operating income for J. Ray. Messrs. Deasonof $250.7 million resulted in a notional payout level of approximately 26% with respect to the 70% portion of the financial performance goals attributable to operating income, and Nesser were the onlyconsolidated ROIC of 8% resulted in a notional payout of 0.00% with respect to the 30% portion of

financial performance goals attributable to consolidated ROIC. The combined operating income and ROIC performance resulted in eligibility of the participants in the EICP to earn approximately 18% of their target EICP compensation, subject to the assessment of their individual goals.

The Continuing Named Executives.    None of the Continuing Named Executives whose 2008 EICP awards were directly tiedawarded bonuses under the 2011 EICP. Based on McDermott’s 2011 financial results, the Continuing Named Executives were eligible to J. Ray stand-alone operating income goals and, as a result, neither officer earned any payment as to that portionearn approximately 18% of their respective 2011 target EICP award. 25%compensation, subject to the assessment of their respective individual goals. Upon the recommendation of Mr. Deason’sJohnson based on the 2011 financial results, the Compensation Committee, in the exercise of its discretion, determined that, although the Continuing Named Executives and other participants in the EICP were eligible to earn approximately 18% of their target EICP award attributablecompensation, 0% would be awarded in light of the financial results. Instead, as recommended by Mr. Johnson, the Compensation Committee determined that the bonus amounts that otherwise would have been payable should effectively be returned to financial performance was based onthe shareholders in the form of additional operating income, resulting in the reported consolidated operating income. As a result, he earned an EICP bonusincome of $250.7 million. In making this recommendation and decision, respectively, Mr. Johnson and the Compensation Committee considered the increase in 2011 revenues of approximately $48,000. However, at his request, no payment was made43%, together with the decrease in 2011 operating income by approximately 20%, from 2010 levels, the continued performance issues in the Atlantic region and issues relating to Mr. Deasonseveral projects in other regions.

In making its decision not to award bonuses for 2011 under the EICP, for 2008.

Individual Component Payment:  Individual performance accounted for 15% of each Named Executive’s target 2008 EICP award, or, depending on the level of individual and financial performance, 0-30% of the final EICP award amount. The Compensation Committee considered (1)noted that Mr. Johnson had achieved the individual performance component, based on the Governance Committee’s assessment of theMr. Johnson’s individual performance against stated goals, and each of Messrs. FeesElders, Carlson and WilkinsonMcCormack and (2) Mr. Fees’ assessment of each other Named Executive’s individual performance. In addition to those assessments, the Compensation Committee applied the following three general principles to determine the amount to be paid for individual performance:
1) If financial performance did not meet or exceed the threshold level, no amount would be earned for individual performance, even if the individual goals were achieved;
2) No Named Executive could earn more than 15% of his target EICP for individual performance unless target financial performance was achieved; and
3) If target financial performance wasMs. Hinrichs had achieved a Named Executive could earn up to 30% of his target EICP award based on individual performance.
Mr. Fees and Mr. Taff both achieved all of their individual goals. However, the portion of Mr. Fees’ award attributable to his service as McDermott’s Chief Executive Officer, and as to Mr. Taff, the Compensation Committee limited their respective individual performance components based on Mr. Johnson’s assessment of their respective individual performance achievements against stated goals, with the exception of the financial performance goal and a safety goal for Mr. McCormack.

Mr. Nesser.    Pursuant to 15% since the consolidated operating income results were below target performance levels. As toterms of Mr. Fees’ individual component related to that portionNesser’s separation agreement entered into in connection with his retirement, Mr. Nesser was paid

his prorated 2011 EICP compensation in August 2011. Per the terms of his EICP award received as Chief Executive Officer of B&W, the Compensation Committee approved the individual component of that portion at 30%. Messrs. Bethards, Nesser and Wilkinson met or exceeded their individual goals, except with respect to one of their goals, which in each case was only partially achieved.separation agreement, Mr. Nesser as to that portion of this EICP award attributablewas paid a cash payment equal to his service as McDermott’s Chief Administrativetarget bonus under the EICP times a fraction, the numerator of which was the number of days elapsed in the year in which the retirement took place and Legal Officer, and Mr. Wilkinson, earned slightly less than the 15% target amount as a resultdenominator of the consolidated operating income results, and Mr. Bethards earned slightly less than 30% for individual performance as to both of his EICP awards as a result of B&W’s operating income results. As a result of J. Ray’s operating income results,which was 365. Mr. Nesser earned no paymentreceived a prorated target bonus of $206,408, based on the individual component of his EICP award attributable to his service as Chief Operating Officer of J. Ray.

Analysis of 2008 Discretionary Awards.  The financial performance of J. Ray in 2008 negatively impacted the amount of EICP awards paid out to each Named Executive for 2008. partial year service. For more information regarding Mr. Nesser’s separation agreement, see “Employment and Severance Arrangements — Employment and Separation Agreements” below.

Long-Term Incentive Compensation

The Compensation Committee believed that J. Ray’s results disproportionately impacted the EICP awards of Messrs. Fees, Bethards, Nesser and Taff. Specifically, the awards earned by Messrs. Fees and Nesser were both considerably lower than the awards they would have otherwise received in their former positions. To a lesser extent, Mr. Bethards’ EICP award was affected by J. Ray’s financials as a result of the consolidated operating income goal that became applicable to him on his appointment as Chief Executive Officer of B&W. In addition, Mr. Taff’s target EICP award was already 21% below market-median, as discussed above. However, as a result of J. Ray’s financial performance, Mr. Taff’s actual 2008 award was approximately 46% below market, which the Compensation Committee concluded was significantly beyond the reasonable range of competitive compensation. Finally, the Compensation Committee considered the below-market salary and bonus paid to Mr. Fees and the execution of his100-day plan as McDermott’s Chief Executive Officer. As a result, the Compensation Committee authorized additional awards to these Named Executives in amounts it considered reasonable and appropriate under the circumstances to incentivize and reward them for their individual contribution to the overall performance of McDermott. No discretionary bonus was paid to Mr. Deason, as discussed above, or to Mr. Wilkinson, who retired in 2008.


28


Equity-Based Compensation
We believebelieves that the interests of our shareholdersstockholders are best served when a significant percentage of executive compensation is comprised of equity and other long-term incentives that appreciate in value contingent upon increases in the pricevalue of our common stock and other indicatorsperformance measures that reflect improvements in McDermott’s business fundamentals. Therefore, long-term incentive compensation represents the single largest element of our Named Executives’ total direct compensation.

Analysis of 2011 Equity Grants.

Mix of 2011 Equity.    In 2011, the Compensation Committee includes equity and otherallocated long-term incentive awardscompensation to officers, including the Continuing Named Executives, as follows:

50% performance shares;

25% non-qualified stock options; and

25% restricted stock units.

To strengthen its commitment to performance-based compensation, the Compensation Committee resumed using performance shares in 2011. The Compensation Committee believes the granting of total shareholder return (“TSR”) performance shares is an appropriate element of incentive compensation, in that TSR performance shares align the Continuing Named Executives’ interests with those of our stockholders, with a focus on long-term results. The amount of performance shares that vest, if any, is scheduled to initially be determined at the end of three calendar years (including 2011) based on McDermott’s TSR relative to the Proxy Peer Group during the same period, with subsequent measurements of TSR relative to the Proxy Peer Group at the end of four and five calendar years (including 2011). The total percentage of performance shares which

will vest, if any, may range in amount between 0% and 200% of the number of shares granted, depending on McDermott’s TSR relative to the Proxy Peer Group over the applicable measurement periods. As of December 31, 2011, the estimated payout as a significant partpercentage of target for the performance shares granted in 2011 was 0% due to the Company’s share price performance versus the Proxy Peer Group.

As in 2009 and 2010, in 2011 the Compensation Committee continued to use stock options, which reward and drive performance based on absolute stock price improvement. The stock options generally vest in one-third increments on the first, second and third anniversaries of the grant date and have an option term of seven years. As of December 31, 2011, the price of the Company’s shares had not exceeded the strike price of the stock options granted in 2011.

Similarly, as in 2008, 2009 and 2010, the Compensation Committee awarded restricted stock units to the Continuing Named Executives, although such restricted stock units represented a smaller percentage of the Continuing Named Executive’s long-term incentive compensation than in the recent past. Restricted stock units are intended to promote the retention of employees, including the Continuing Named Executives, and generally vest in one-third increments on the first, second and third anniversaries of the grant date.

In 2011 our Compensation Committee adopted a clawback policy under which McDermott would seek to recover any incentive-based award granted to any executive officer as required by the provisions of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act or any other “clawback” provision required by law or the listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange. Each grant made to the Continuing Named Executives in 2011 was subject to this clawback policy.

Additionally, and consistent with our recent past practice, our grant agreements for awards made in 2011 contained a forfeiture provision. In 2011, this provision provided that in the event that, while the grantee is employed by McDermott or performing services on behalf of McDermott under any consulting agreement, the grantee is convicted of a misdemeanor involving fraud, dishonesty or moral turpitude or a felony, or the grantee engages in conduct that adversely affects or, in the sole judgment of the Compensation Committee, may reasonably be expected to adversely affect, the business reputation

or economic interests of the Company, then all rights and benefits awarded under the respective agreements are immediately forfeited, terminated and withdrawn.

For more information regarding the 2011 performance shares, stock options and restricted stock units, see the “Grants of Plan-Based Awards” table under “Compensation of Executive Officers” below.

Value of 2011 Long-Term Incentive Compensation.    The 2011 target long-term incentive compensation for our Named Executives was as follows:

Named Executive(1)  Target LTI
Value
   Percent  of
Market(2)

S. M. Johnson

  $4,000,000    125%

P. L. Elders

  $1,000,000    79%

G. L. Carlson

  $416,720    114%

L. K. Hinrichs

  $931,767    105%

J. T. McCormack(3)

EVP, COO

SVP, Operations

  $

$

1,125,000

465,000

  

  

  81%

100%

(1)No long-term incentive award was granted to Mr. Nesser in 2011 in light of his anticipated retirement by year-end 2011.

(2)Market = Median target long-term incentives based on the benchmark applicable to the executive. 100% represents median compensation.

(3)The target LTI value shown in connection with Mr. McCormack’s promotion to EVP, COO reflects his March 2011 LTI award in addition to a supplemental award in the amount of $660,000 in connection with his promotion. Percent of market reflected for Mr. McCormack’s current position is the percent of market based upon a combination of Mr. McCormack’s target LTI award values from his former and current positions.

When considering the target values of long-term incentive to be provided to the Continuing Named Executives, the Compensation Committee sought to set target values within the market range. Accordingly, each Continuing Named Executive’s target long-term incentive value was within market range, with the exception of Messrs. Johnson and Elders and Mr. McCormack’s target long-term incentive value associated with his promotion to EVP, COO in June 2011. When granted, the value of Mr. Johnson’s long-term incentive compensation was above market range in order to further compensate Mr. Johnson for his performance following the Spin-off, while continuing to incentivize him based on the long-term performance of McDermott. The value of Mr. Elders’ long-term incentive compensation was below market

range; however, combined with the other components of compensation for 2011, his target total direct compensation.compensation was within market range. The value of Mr. McCormack’s long-term incentive compensation following his promotion to EVP, COO was also set below market range in light of the Compensation Committee’s view that a newly promoted Chief Operating Officer should receive competitive compensation, although not necessarily equal to the compensation of a more experienced officer in a similar position.

As of December 31, 2011, (1) the estimated payout as a percent of target for the performance shares granted in 2011 was 0%, and (2) the share price of our common stock had not exceeded the strike price of the stock options granted in 2011. However, the amount of performance shares granted in 2011 that ultimately vest, if any, will be determined by reference to our total shareholder return over three-, four- and five-year periods. The vesting of these performance shares would impact the future realizable value of these performance shares. In addition, an increase in our stock price compared to our stock price at December 31, 2011 may impact the future realizable value of the stock options granted in 2011.

Sizing Long-Term Incentive Compensation.    The Compensation Committee generally determines the size of equity-based grants as a dollar value, rather than granting a targeted number of shares. The number of restricted stock units, performance shares and stock options granted can be expressed through the following formula:

target value of target long-term incentive($)/FMV($).

The fair market value of one restricted stock unit was computed based on the full fair market value of McDermott’s common stock based on the closing price of our common stock on the New York Stock Exchange on the date of grant. The fair market value of one performance share was determined by Pay Governance using a Monte Carlo valuation model and the fair market value of an option to acquire one share of our common stock was determined by Pay Governance using a Black-Scholes model. Both of these valuation models consider the full fair market value of our common stock on the date of grant in conjunction with other valuation inputs. Full fair market value may differ from grant date fair value dependent on the analysis performed under Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718.

 

For example, for the long-term incentive compensation granted to the Continuing Named Executives in March 2011, the fair market value of our common stock as of the date the grants were determined (based on the closing price of our common stock on the New York Stock Exchange) was $25.64, compared to the value of $35.38 for each performance share and the value of $10.19 for an option to acquire one share of our common stock. Because the long-term incentive compensation grants vest over three years, the number of shares calculated was rounded to the nearest multiple of three.

Timing of Equity Grants.Grants  Since 2005, the Compensation Committee has granted annual equity awards at its regularly scheduled committee meeting held in connection with our annual meeting of stockholders..    To avoid timing equity grants ahead of the release of material nonpublicnon-public information, the Compensation Committee generally approvesgrants stock option and other equity awards effective as of the first day of the next open trading window following the meeting at which the grants are approved, which is generally the third NYSE trading day following the filing of our annual report onForm 10-K or quarterly report onForm 10-Q with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Analysis of 2008 Equity Grants.
Mix of 2008 Equity.  In 2006 and 2007, the Compensation Committee relied exclusively on performance sharesSEC. This practice was followed for all long-term incentive compensation grants to deliver equity-based compensation toContinuing Named Executives. These performance shares generally provided for vesting three years from the date of grantExecutives in an amount between 0% and 150% of the2011.

Perquisites

We provide a limited number of shares granted depending on the level of cumulative consolidated operating income achieved during2006-2008, for the 2006 grants,perquisites and2007-2009, for the 2007 grants. At the Compensation Committee’s request, Hewitt reviewed our long-term incentive program relative to the equity practices among the companies in our J.Ray/Corporate Group and our Custom Peer Group. Hewitt’s analysis showed that both groups use a mix of equity types but relied to a significant extent on time-based vesting awards such as restricted stock. Accordingly, Hewitt recommended that the Compensation Committee consider adding restricted stock for retention purposes and to remain competitive with our market. Having considered Hewitt’s analysis and in consideration that compensation through both our EICP awards and performance share awards is based on achieving operating income targets, the Compensation Committee concluded that using restricted stock as part of our equity-based compensation program was important for retention purposes. However, the Compensation Committee decided that a majority of equity-based compensation for senior executives, including Named Executives, should continue to be performance-based. As a result, the Compensation Committee approved the use of a mix of performance shares and restricted stock awards in 2008 along the following general guidelines:

• elected officers (including our Named Executives): 75% performance shares and 25% restricted stock; and
• all other participants: 50% performance shares and 50% restricted stock.
Similar to prior years, our 2008 performance shares are generally scheduled to vest three years from the date of grant in an amount between 0% and 150% of the number of shares granted, depending on the level of cumulative consolidated operating income achieved during2008-2010. The shares of restricted stock we awarded in 2008 generally vest one-third on the first, second and third anniversary of the date of grant. For 2008, performance shares represented approximately 75% and restricted stock represented approximately 25% of our Named Executives’ equity-based compensation, except for Mr. Bethards. Restricted stock comprised approximately 54% of Mr. Bethards’ 2008 equity-based compensation due to a restricted stock grant made in connection with his promotion to Chief Executive Officer of B&W. That grant was made in November 2008, and, with one-third of the performance measurement period already completed, the Compensation Committee believed that restricted stock provided a greater incentive at that time than performance shares.
For more information regarding the 2008 performance share and restricted stock awards, see the Grants of Plan-Based Awards table under “Compensation of Executive Officers” below and disclosures under “Compensation of Executive Officers — Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards.”
Sizing Equity Awards.  The Compensation Committee generally determines the size of equity awards as a percentage of a Named Executive’s annual base salary, rather than granting a targeted number of shares. The Compensation Committee determined the amount of each Named Executive’s target equity-based compensation, as a percentage of his annual base salary, based on market data provided by Hewitt. Hewitt applied a discount to


29


equity-based compensation data of our market in order to ensure proper comparison of awards with different terms and plan designs. The dollar value of the target equity award for each Named Executive was derived by multiplying the applicable percentage by the Named Executive’s 2008 base salary. Once the target value was established, the total number of performance shares and shares of restricted stock granted was determined by dividing the target value of equity in dollars by the discounted fair market value near the time of grant of one performance share or one share of restricted stock and rounding down to the nearest 10 shares. The value of one performance share or one share of restricted stock was determined by Hewitt and generally reflected a discount from the market price as quoted on the New York Stock Exchange as a result of the vesting conditions and limitations on transfer. For the annual equity awards granted in February 2008, the fair market value of our common stock as of the date the grants were calculated (based on the closing price of our common stock on the New York Stock Exchange on that date) was $47.10, compared to the discounted value of $34.65 for one performance share and $41.65 for one share of restricted stock.
Value of 2008 Equity Awards.  As a percentage of annual base salary, the equity-based awards granted to Mr. Taff were equal to the median equity value, as a percentage of annual base salary, of equity awards to chief financial officers indicated by our benchmark. The Compensation Committee set the value of Mr. Deason’s equity award at 235% of his base salary, which was approximately 11% above the median percentage value of his position based on the applicable benchmark, to make the dollar value of his award more comparable to his counterpart at B&W. Messrs. Fees, Bethards and Nesser received two equity awards in 2008, the first in connection with the annual grants made by the Compensation Committee in February 2008 and the second in connection with their respective promotions.
As a result of the second equity award, the total value of Mr. Fees’, Mr. Bethards’ and Mr. Nesser’s 2008 equity awards was approximately 49% above, 29% below and 86% above the median value of equity awards, as a percentage of annual base salary, for similar executives in our market, respectively. As a percentage of his annual base salary, Mr. Bethards’ first equity award was approximately 4% above the median value (as a percentage of annual base salary) of our market for his position. In determining the amount of Mr. Bethards’ second award, the Compensation Committee considered current market data provided by Hewitt, and granted him a second award that, in absolute numbers, was comparable to equity awards made to his counterpart at J. Ray. Based on market data provided by Hewitt in connection with Mr. Nesser’s promotion, the value of his February 2008 equity award was near the median value of equity awards (as a percentage of annual base salary) of comparable executives for both his new and former position. However, the Compensation Committee awarded Mr. Nesser additional equity-based awards in connection with his change of duties in 2008 to help drive and reward the achievement of long-term performance.
Mr. Fees’ second equity award was based on the median dollar value of equity awards for chief executive officers in our market rather than the median value as a percentage of annual base salary. Our Board considered the change in methodology for Mr. Fees’ award appropriate because Mr. Fees’ base salary was substantially below market median (as discussed under “— Annual Base Salaries” above). Our Board also considered the long-term nature of equity-based awards, which are principally designed to drive and reward long-term performance. At the time, the median value of equity-based awards to chief executive officers in our market as indicated by our benchmark was approximately $5,029,733, without regard to annual base salary. In February 2008, Mr. Fees had received an equity-based award valued at approximately $1,539,000. Accordingly, in August 2008 our Board approved an equity-based award for Mr. Fees of $3,490,733 in connection with his promotion to our Chief Executive Officer. That amount represented the difference between the median dollar value of chief executive officer equity awards in our market and the dollar value of Mr. Fees’ February 2008 award. As a result, in dollar amount, the value of Mr. Fees’ 2008 total equity award was equal to the median value of equity for chief executive officers in our market.
Performance Targets for 2008 Performance-Based Equity.  The 2008 performance shares vest between 0% and 150% of the amount of shares initially granted depending on the level of cumulative operating income obtained over the three-year period ending December 31, 2010. Cumulative operating income at the threshold level will result in vesting of 25% of the performance shares initially granted. 100% and 150% of the shares initially granted vest if our consolidated cumulative operating income over the three-year period reaches the target and maximum


30


levels, respectively. The amount vesting for cumulative operating income between the threshold level and maximum level is determined by linear interpolation.
Based on information provided by management, the Compensation Committee set cumulative operating income at the target and maximum vesting levels at amounts that represent 6% and 10%year-over-year increases from the same adjusted 2007 operating income amounts used to set payouts under our 2008 annual bonus plan. The Compensation Committee determined to structure performance share vesting around the same baseline used in connection with the determination of our annual bonus, to complement and leverage consolidated operating income results that may be achieved as a result of our annual bonus awards. In addition, the Compensation Committee sought to encourage consistent and profitable growth while driving the creation of significant shareholder value. Finally, consistent with our 2006 and 2007 performance share awards, the Compensation Committee concluded that, based on the levels of the performance goals established, no performance shares should vest for cumulative operating income below 85% of the target level for the three-year measurement period.
Perquisites
Perquisites are not generally factored into the determination of the total direct compensation of our Named Executives, because they are typically provided to Named Executives on an exception basis after the Compensation Committee has reviewed the implications of a perquisite on McDermott.
We own a fractional interest in three aircraft through an aircraft management company, which we acquired and use for business purposes and which we make available other personal benefits to our Named ExecutivesExecutives. In 2011 our Compensation Committee adopted a perquisite allowance for limited personal use upon the approval of our Chief Executive Officer. When we permit the personal use of aircraft by a Named Executive, we have a choice regarding the amount of income tax imputed to the executive officer for that use. Under current Internal Revenue Service rules, we may impute to the executive officer the actual cost incurred by us for the flight or an amount based on Standard Industry Fare Level (“SIFL”) rates set by the U.S. Department of Transportation. Imputing income based on SIFL rates usually results in less income tax liability to the executive officer but higher income taxes to us due to limitations on deducting aircraft expenses that exceed the income imputed to employees. To minimize our cost of permitting the personal use of the aircraft, we impute income for personal use of aircraft tocertain officers, including our Named Executives, in an amount that results in the least amount of tax burden for McDermott.
We compute incremental cost for personal use of aircraft on the actual cost incurred by us for the flight, including:
• the cost of fuel;
• a usage charge equal to the hourly rate multiplied by the flight time;
• “dead head” costs, if applicable, of flying empty aircraft to and from locations; and
• the dollar amount of increased income taxes we incur as a result of disallowed deductions under IRS rules.
Since the aircraft are used primarily for business travel, incremental costs generally exclude fixed costs such as the purchase price of our interests in the aircraft, aircraft management fees, depreciation, maintenance and insurance. Our cost for flights using aircraft, whether business or personal, is not affected by the number of passengers. As a result, we do not assign any amount, other than the amount of any disallowed deduction, when computing incremental costs for the presence of guests accompanying a$20,000. The perquisite allowance was provided in order to cover company-required physicals, financial planning and non-company-required spousal travel.

Additionally, and consistent with our past practice, we may reimburse Named Executive on such flights. While we do not generally incur any additional cost, this travel may result in imputed income to the Named Executive and disallowed deductions on our income taxes. We will reimburse the Named ExecutiveExecutives for the travel expenses of a guest accompanying a Named Executive, including the provision of agross-up for any imputed income, but only when the presence of that guest is related to the underlying business purpose of the trip. We also provide our Named Executives with a taxgross-up for imputed income in connection with a relocation with McDermott or one of our affiliated companies. Otherwise, it is not our practice, and we do not intend, on any relocation-related expense reimbursements that may be subject to provide any Named Executive with a taxgross-up for imputed income resulting from executive perquisites, including personal use of corporate aircraft.


31

tax.


Post-Employment Compensation
Retirement Plans

Thrift Plan

Overview..    We provide retirement benefits for most of our U.S. employees, including our Named Executives, through sponsorship of the McDermott Thrift Plan, a combinationqualified defined contribution 401(k) plan, which we refer to as our “Thrift Plan.”

Retirement and Excess Plans.    Some of our longer-term U.S. employees, including Mr. Nesser and Ms. Hinrichs, are entitled to retirement benefits under the McDermott (U.S.) Retirement Plan, the qualified defined benefit pension plans,plan we sponsor, which we refer to as our “Retirement Plans,Plan.The Retirement Plan has been closed to new participants since 2006, and a qualified defined contribution 401(k)benefit accruals under the Retirement Plan were frozen altogether in 2010.

We also sponsor an unfunded, nonqualified excess retirement plan, which we refer to as our “Thrift“Excess Plan.” The Excess Plan” for most of our regular employees, including our Named Executives. We sponsor the following four Retirement Plans:

• the McDermott Retirement Plan for the benefit of the employees of McDermott Incorporated;
• the JRM Retirement Plan for the benefit of the employees of our Offshore Oil and Gas Construction segment;
• the Government Operations Retirement Plan for the benefit of the employees of our Government Operations segment; and
• the Commercial Operations Retirement Plan for the benefit of the employees of our Power Generation Systems segment.
In addition to the broad-based qualified plans described above, we sponsor unfunded, nonqualified or excess retirement plans. The excess plans cover covers a small group of highly compensated employees, including our Named Executives,Mr. Nesser and Ms. Hinrichs, whose ultimate benefitbenefits under the applicable Retirement Plan isare reduced by Internal Revenue Code Sections 415(b)limits on the amount of benefits which may be provided under qualified plans and 401(a)(17) limits.the amount of compensation which may be taken into account in computing benefits under qualified plans. Benefits under the excess plansExcess Plan are paid from our general assets. As is the case with the Retirement Plan, benefits under the Excess Plan have been frozen since 2010, and no further benefits are accruing to Ms. Hinrichs or Mr. Nesser under the Excess Plan.

Messrs. Johnson, Elders, and Carlson do not participate in the Retirement Plan or the Excess Plan because their employment with McDermott commenced after new participation in the Retirement Plan was closed. Mr. McCormack does not participate in the Retirement Plan or the Excess Plan because he had not met the applicable eligibility requirements at the time the Retirement Plan was closed to new participants.

See the Pension Benefit“Pension Benefits” table under “Compensation of Executive Officers” below for more information regarding ourthe Retirement Plans.

Recent Changes to Retirement Plans.  OverPlan and the past several years, we have reassessed our retirement plans due to the volatility, cost and complexity associated with defined benefit plans and evolving employee preferences. As a result, we have taken steps to shift away from traditional defined benefit plans and towardExcess Plan.

Deferred Compensation Plan.    The Deferred Compensation Plan is a defined contribution approach. In 2003, we closed the JRM Retirement Plan to new participants and froze benefit accruals for existing participants. In lieu of future defined benefit plan accruals under the JRM Retirement Plan, we amended our Thrift Plan to provide affected employees with an automatic cash contribution to their Thrift Plan account equal to 3% of the employee’s base pay, plus overtime pay, expatriate pay and commissions, which we refer to collectively as “thriftable earnings.” Mr. Deason had not satisfied the JRM Retirement Plan eligibility requirements at the time that plan was closed to new participants. Therefore, he does not participate in a Retirement Plan or an excess plan. In 2006, we closed the McDermott, Commercial Operations and Government Operations Retirement Plans to new salaried participants and froze benefit accruals for existing salaried participants with less than five years of credited service as of March 31, 2006, subject to specific annualcost-of-living increases. In lieu of future defined benefit plan accruals under those plans, we further amended our Thrift Plan to provide an automatic cash contribution to the Thrift Plan accounts of affected employees and new hires in an amount between 3% and 8% of the employee’s thriftable earnings, based on their length of service. Mr. Taff was affected by these changes. Mr. Taff does not participate in a Retirement Plan or an Excess Plan because he had not met the McDermott Retirement Plan eligibility requirements at the time that plan was closed to new participants. In 2007, we offered salaried participants in the McDermott, Commercial Operations and Government Operations Retirement Plans with between five and 10 years of credited service as of January 1, 2007 the one-time irrevocable choice between (1) continuing to accrue future benefits under the Retirement Plan or (2) freezing their Retirement Plan accrued benefit as of March 31, 2007, subject to annualcost-of-living increases, and receiving an automatic service-based cash contribution to their Thrift Plan account instead. Based on years of service, Messrs. Wilkinson and Nesser were offered this choice. Mr. Wilkinson chose to have his McDermott Retirement Plan accrued benefit frozen. Therefore, his service after March 31, 2007 is not taken into account as credited service under a Retirement Plan. Mr. Nesser chose to continue to accrue future benefits under the McDermott Retirement Plan, and he continues to be credited with service under that plan.

Supplemental Plans.  In 2005, as part of our philosophy to move away from defined benefit plans, our management recommended that the Board of Directors and the Compensation Committee terminate our then existing defined benefit supplemental executive retirement plan. In its place, our Board of Directors and


32


Compensation Committee established a new supplemental executive retirement plan which we refer to asestablished by our Board and the “SERP,”Compensation Committee to help maintain the competitiveness of our post-employment compensation as compared to our market. The SERPDeferred Compensation Plan is an unfunded, nonqualified plan that provides participants with benefits based uponon the participant’s notional account balance at the time of retirement or termination. Annually, weUnder the Deferred Compensation Plan, on an annual basis the Compensation Committee has the discretion to credit a specified participant’s notional account

with an amount equal to a percentage of the participant’s prior-year base salary and annual bonus paid in the prior year. We refer to such credit as a “Company Contribution.” In 2011, Messrs. Johnson, McCormack and Nesser and Ms. Hinrichs each were participants in the Deferred Compensation Plan and received a Company Contribution in an amount equal to 5% of their respective prior-year base salaries and annual bonuses paid in the participant’s prior year. Messrs. Elders and Carlson were also participants and received (1) a Company Contribution in an amount equal to 5% of their respective prior-year base salary paid, and annual bonus. (2) a discretionary contribution equal in value to 5% of their respective target bonuses for 2010 and the value of their respective prior-year target base salaries they would have earned for the period January 1, 2010 through their respective hire dates.

The Compensation Committee has designated deemed mutual fund investments to serve as indices for the purpose of determining notional investment gains and losses to theeach participant’s account.account for any Company Contribution or participant elected deferrals. Each participant allocates the annual notional contributionany Company Contributions and deferrals among the various deemed investments. SERPDeferred Compensation Plan benefits are based on the participant’s vested notional account balance at the time of retirement or termination. Please see the Nonqualified“Nonqualified Deferred CompensationCompensation” table on page 47 and accompanying narrative below for furthermore information about the SERPDeferred Compensation Plan and our contributionsCompany Contributions to our Named Executives’ Deferred Compensation Plan accounts.

Employment and Severance Arrangements

Employment and Separation Agreements.Agreements.    Except forchange-in-control agreements and a separation agreement with Mr. Wilkinson,described below, we do not currently have any employment or severance agreements with any of our Continuing Named Executives.

In recent years, the Compensation Committee has determined that it may be appropriate in certain circumstances for us to enter into separation agreements with key officers. Under such agreements, the officer would be retained as a consultant for a limited period to assist us in the transition to a successor. In general, under these separation agreements, the officer receives a prorated EICP award for the year in which the separation agreement commences, continued vesting in equity awards at the normal vesting schedule for the duration of the consulting period and accelerated vesting of the unvested portion of the officer’s SERP account. In September 2008, we entered into such a separation agreementconnection with Mr. Wilkinson. In addition, in October 2008, weNesser’s retirement, a subsidiary of McDermott entered into a separate consulting agreementSeparation Agreement with Mr. WilkinsonNesser. Under the terms of the Separation Agreement, Mr. Nesser was entitled to provide our Boardreceive various payments and management post-transition assistancebenefits under a Restructuring Transaction Retention Agreement entered into between Mr. Nesser and a subsidiary of McDermott in connection with specific matters involving customers, investors, acquisition transactionsthe Spin-off. These payments and other matters.benefits included: (1) a cash payment of two times the sum of Mr. Nesser’s annual base salary and target EICP award; (2) a prorated target EICP award; (3) a cash payment equal to two years

of medical benefits; (4) earned but unused vacation; and (5) full vesting of Mr. Nesser’s outstanding equity awards granted in 2008 and 2009. In addition to those benefits, under the Separation Agreement, Mr. Nesser is treated as if he had continued to be an employee of McDermott for purposes of the vesting of an award of restricted stock units and stock options, which were granted to Mr. Nesser in 2010 and remained unvested as of the date of his Separation Agreement, in accordance with the vesting schedule of those awards.

Additionally, under the Separation Agreement, Mr. Nesser provided general consulting and advisory services to McDermott for a period of six months following his retirement. In consideration of those services, Mr. Nesser received $25,000 per month, as well as reimbursement of reasonable expenses incurred by Mr. Nesser in rendering those services. See the Potential“Potential Payments uponUpon Termination or Change in Control table under “Compensation of Executive Officers”Control” below for more information regardingon the payments made to and benefits received by Mr. Wilkinson’s agreements.

Nesser under his Separation Agreement.

Change-in-Control Agreements. Agreements.    In our experience,change-in-control agreements for Named Executivescertain executive officers are common within our industry, and our Board and Compensation Committee believe that providing these agreements to our Named Executives protects shareholders’stockholders’ interests by helping to assure management continuity and focus through and beyond a change in control. Accordingly, the Compensation Committee has offeredchange-in-control agreements to key senior executives including Named Executives, since 2005. With the exception of ourOur change-in-control agreement with Mr. Fees, ourchange-in-control agreements generally provide a cash severance payment of two (2.99 for Mr. Johnson) times the sum of the Named Executive’s annual base salary and target EICP award and provide an additional taxgross-upa pro-rated bonus payment under the EICP. In addition, each such officer would become fully vested in the event of any excise tax liability. Additionally, theseoutstanding and unvested equity-based awards and his or her respective account balance in our Deferred Compensation Plan.

Our change-in-control agreements contain what is commonly referred to as a “double trigger,” that is, they provide benefits only upon an involuntary termination or constructive termination of the executive officer within one year following a change in control. In 2008, ataddition, the request of the Compensation Committee, Hewitt conducted a review of ourchange-in-control agreements relative to existing practices among companies in the J.Ray/Corporate Group and the Custom Peer Group and to emerging practices generally. Specifically, Hewitt consideredchange-in-control provisions relating to triggers, the definition and calculation of severance pay and treatment of payments for bonus, equity, medical and excise tax. Hewitt’s analysis indicated that ourchange-in-control agreements were generally consistent with practices in our market and in the Custom Peer Group, except with respect to calculating severance pay for chief executive officers and payments for medical benefits. Market practices generally calculated chief executive officer severance at 2.99 or 3.0 times the executive’s pay and provided an additional payment for medical benefits. Based on Hewitt’s analysis, the Compensation Committee revised ourchange-in-control agreements to include a payment for two years of medical benefits for each Named Executive and, for Mr. Fees’ agreement only, calculate severance pay at 2.99 times his annual base salary and target EICP award. No change was made in the 2008change-in-control agreements regarding the provision for an excise taxgross-up payment. However, for any futurechange-in-control agreements we may enter into, we agreements: (1) do not intend to provide for an excise taxgross-up payment. gross-ups; (2) require the applicable officer’s execution of a release prior to payment of certain benefits; and (3) provide for the potential reduction in payments to an applicable officer in order to avoid excise taxes.

Because he is no longer employed by McDermott, Mr. Nesser no longer has a change-in-control agreement with McDermott. See the Potential“Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in ControlControl” table under “Compensation of Executive Officers” below and the accompanying disclosures for more information regarding thechange-in-control agreements with our Continuing Named Executives, as well as other plans and arrangements that have different trigger mechanisms that relate to a change in control.


33


Other Compensation Policies

Stock Ownership GuidelinesGuidelines.    
Overview.To alignassist with the alignment of the interests of directors, executive officers and shareholders,stockholders, we believe our directors and executive officers should have a significant financial stake in McDermott. To further that goal, we have adopted stock ownership guidelines in 2005, as amended effective January 1, 2006,August 9, 2010 and November 9, 2011, requiring generally that our nonmanagementnonemployee directors and our officers at the level of vice president or above maintain a minimum ownership interest in McDermott. The amount required to be retained varies depending on the executive’s position. The guidelines require our stock ownership requirements are as follows:

Chief Executive Officer — five times annual base salary;

Executive Officers directly reporting to ownthe Chief Executive Officer — three times annual base salary;

Other Elected Vice Presidents — two times annual base salary; and retain a minimum of 100,000 shares of our common stock and our other Named Executives to own and retain at least 35,000 shares. The guidelines require nonmanagement directors to own and retain a minimum of 6,000 shares of our common stock.

Nonemployee Directors — five times annual Board member retainer.

Directors and officers have five years from the effective date of the amended stock ownership guidelines, or their initial election as a director/officer, or a change in position which increases the expected ownership level, whichever is later, to comply with

the guidelines. The CompensationGovernance Committee has discretion toreviews each director’s and officer’s progress towards the requirements of the stock ownership guidelines annually, and may waive or modify the stock ownership guidelines for directors and officers.officers in the Governance Committee’s sole discretion.

Derivatives Trading and Hedging.    McDermott’s Insider Trading Policy prohibits all directors, officers and employees, including our Continuing Named Executives, from engaging in “short sales” or trading in puts, calls or other options on McDermott’s common stock. Additionally, directors, officers and employees are prohibited from engaging in hedging transactions, and from holding McDermott shares in a margin account or pledging McDermott shares as collateral for a loan.

Clawback Policy.    Our Compensation Committee has adopted a clawback policy under which McDermott would seek to recover any incentive-based award granted to any executive officer as required by the provisions of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act or any other “clawback” provision required by law or the listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange.

Additionally, consistent with our recent practice, our grant agreements for awards made in 2011 contain a forfeiture provision. In 2011, this provision provided that in the event that, while the grantee is employed by McDermott or performing services on behalf of McDermott under any consulting agreement, the grantee is convicted of a misdemeanor involving fraud, dishonesty or moral turpitude or a felony, or the grantee engages in conduct that adversely affects or, in the sole judgment of the Compensation Committee, may reasonably be expected to adversely affect, the business reputation or economic interests of the Company, then all rights and benefits awarded under the respective agreements are immediately forfeited, terminated and withdrawn.

 
Compliance.  We assess our Named Executives’ compliance with these guidelines annually. When calculating stock ownership for purposes of these guidelines, we do not include any stock options, even if vested but unexercised. All of our Named Executives are

2011 PEER GROUPS

Proxy Peer Group:

Baker Hughes Incorporated

FMC Technologies, Inc.National Oilwell Varco, Inc.

Cal Dive International, Inc.

Global Industries Ltd. 1Noble Corporation

Cameron International Corporation

Halliburton CompanyOceaneering International, Inc.

Chicago Bridge & Iron Company

Helix Energy Solutions Group, Inc.Oil States International, Inc.

Dresser-Rand Group, Inc.

Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc.Shaw Group, Inc.

Foster Wheeler AG

KBR, Inc.Tidewater Inc.
Survey Peer Group:

Ameron International Corporation

Fluor CorporationOwens Corning

Anadarko Petroleum Corporation

The Goodyear Tire & Rubber CompanyOwens-Illinois, Inc.

A.O. Smith Corporation

Graco Inc.Parker Hannifin Corporation

Ball Corporation

Greif, Inc.Parsons Corporation

Barnes Group, Inc.

HD Supply, Inc.Pittsburgh Corning Corporation

Beam, Inc.

Herman Miller, Inc.Polymer Group, Inc.

Bemis Company, Inc.

Hess CorporationPolyOne Corporation

BG US Services

HNTB CorporationPulteGroup, Inc.

Bovis Lend Lease International Ltd.

Holcim Ltd.Saudi Arabian Oil Co.

BP p.l.c.

Hunt Consolidated, Inc.SCA Americas, Inc.

Brady Corporation

Husky Injection Molding Systems Ltd.Schlumberger Limited

Building Materials Corporation of America

Illinois Tool Works Inc.Sealed Air Corp.

Calgon Carbon Corporation

Ingersoll Rand plcShell Oil Company

Cameron International Corporation

ION Geophysical CorporationSimpson Manufacturing Company, Inc.

Caterpillar Inc.

Irving Oil Commercial G.P.Sonoco Products Co.

Cemex Internacional S.A de C.V.

ITT CorporationSpectra Energy Corp

Chevron Corporation

Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc.SPX Corporation

CH2M Hill Companies, Ltd.

KBR, Inc.Stantec Inc.

Cimarex Energy Co.

Key Energy Services, Inc.Sunoco, Inc.

Connell Limited Partnership

Koch Industries, Inc.Swagelok Company

ConocoPhillips

Lafarge North America Inc.Terex Corporation

Cooper Industries plc

L.B. Foster CompanyTesoro Corporation

Corning Incorporated

Magellan Midstream Partners, L.P.Textron Inc.

DCP Midstream LLC

MAG Industrial Automation Systems LLCThermadyne Industries, Inc.

Deere & Company

The Manitowoc Company, Inc.Thomas & Betts Corporation

Devon Energy Corporation

Marathon Oil Corporation3M Company

Donaldson Company, Inc.

Matthews International CorporationThe Timken Company

Eaton Corporation

MeadWestvaco CorporationThe Toro Company

EMCOR Group, Inc.

Milacron LLCTrinity Industries, Inc.

Exterran Holdings, Inc.

Mine Safety Appliances CompanyUnifi, Inc.

Exxon Mobil Corporation

Murphy Oil CorporationUSG Corporation

Ferrovial, S.A.

MWH Global, Inc.Valero Energy Corporation

Flowserve Corporation

Occidental Petroleum CorporationWatts Water Technologies, Inc.

1 Global Industries Ltd. was acquired by Technip S.A. in compliance with these guidelines. Additionally, we have considered these guidelines and believe that the minimum levels continue to be appropriate for our officers and directors at this time.

December 2011.

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORTCOMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

We have reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis with McDermott’s management and, based on our review and discussions, we recommended to the Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement.

THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE

Thomas C. Schievelbein, Chairman

Roger A. Brown

Oliver D. Kingsley, Jr.


34


Mary L. Shafer-Malicki

David A. Trice

COMPENSATION COMPENSATIONOF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

The following table summarizes the prior three years’ compensation of our current and former Chief Executive Officer, our Chief Financial Officer, and our three highest paid executive officers who did not serve as our CEO and CFO during 2008,2011 and were employed by McDermott as of December 31, 2011, and Mr. Nesser, who would have been one of our three highest paid executive officers but for the fiscal years endedfact that he was not employed by McDermott as of December 31, 2006, December 31, 2007 and December 31, 2008.2011. We refer to these persons as our Named Executives. No compensation information for Mr. Taff is provided for 2006Mr. Elders for 2009 because he becamejoined our company in 2010, and no information is provided for Mr. Carlson or Ms. Hinrichs for 2009 because they did not become Named Executives until 2010 or for Mr. McCormack for 2009 or 2010 because he did not become a Named Executive in 2007. No compensation information for Mr. Bethards is provided for 2006 or 2007 because he became a Named Executive in 2008.

until 2011.

Summary Compensation TableSUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
                                     
              Change in
    
              Pension
    
              Value and
    
              Nonqualified
    
            Non-Equity
 Deferred
    
        Stock
 Option
 Incentive Plan
 Compensation
 All Other
  
Name and Principal Position
 Year Salary Bonus Awards Awards Compensation Earnings Compensation Total
 
J.A. Fees  2008  $592,500  $270,223  $2,013,812  $53,131  $570,803  $143,028  $148,310  $3,791,807 
Chief Executive Officer  2007  $515,000  $0  $1,685,149  $169,616  $702,975  $333,153  $57,679  $3,463,572 
   2006  $460,000  $0  $722,379  $262,030  $568,100  $367,828  $56,307  $2,436,644 
                                     
B.W. Wilkinson  2008  $562,500  $0  $2,299,144  $122,340  $323,550  $69,867  $2,259,830  $5,637,231 
Former Chairman &  2007  $750,000  $0  $2,472,448  $392,293  $1,462,500  $107,004  $105,050  $5,289,295 
Chief Executive Officer  2006  $750,000  $0  $1,694,958  $620,566  $1,140,000  $158,853  $116,687  $4,481,064 
                                     
M.S. Taff  2008  $440,000  $110,000  $914,569  $30,220  $141,207   N/A  $45,757  $1,681,753 
Senior Vice President &  2007  $374,999  $0  $648,095  $69,458  $387,563   N/A  $34,211  $1,514,326 
Chief Financial Officer  2006   N/A   N/A   N/A   N/A   N/A   N/A   N/A   N/A 
                                     
B.C. Bethards  2008  $438,675  $10,000  $842,624  $0  $509,298  $158,014  $54,831  $2,013,442 
President & Chief  2007   N/A   N/A   N/A   N/A   N/A   N/A   N/A   N/A 
Executive Officer, The
Babcock & Wilcox Company
  2006   N/A   N/A   N/A   N/A   N/A   N/A   N/A   N/A 
                                     
R.A. Deason  2008  $540,000  $0  $1,456,797  $47,766  $0   N/A  $117,077  $2,161,640 
President & Chief Executive  2007  $485,000  $0  $1,236,539  $152,977  $679,000   N/A  $59,375  $2,612,891 
Officer, J. Ray McDermott  2006  $440,000  $0  $478,188  $247,814  $543,400   N/A  $55,751  $1,765,153 
                                     
J.T. Nesser, III  2008  $500,000  $100,000  $1,295,766  $37,115  $136,122  $104,864  $74,933  $2,248,800 
Executive Vice President &  2007  $475,013  $0  $1,011,166  $120,551  $602,079  $95,660  $46,078  $2,350,547 
Chief Operating Officer,
J. Ray McDermott
  2006  $385,000  $0  $594,535  $196,653  $423,500  $55,341  $42,818  $1,697,847 
Bonus.  The amounts reported in the “Bonus” column are attributable to discretionary bonus awards earned in 2008 but paid in 2009. For more information regarding discretionary bonuses, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Annual Bonus — Analysis of 2008 Discretionary Awards” above.
Stock and Option Awards.  The amounts reported in the “Stock Awards” and “Option Awards” columns represent the associated dollar amounts we recognized in the applicable year for financial statement reporting purposes under SFAS No. 123R. Under SFAS No. 123R, the fair value of equity-classified awards, such as restricted stock, performance shares and stock options, is determined on the date of grant and is not remeasured. Grant date fair values are determined using the closing price of our common stock on the date of grant, for restricted stock and performance shares, or an option-pricing model, for stock options. We use the Black-Scholes option-pricing model for measuring the fair value of stock options granted. The determination of the fair value of an award on the date of grant using an option-pricing model requires various assumptions, such as the expected life of the award and stock price volatility. For a discussion of the valuation assumptions, see Note 10 to our consolidated financial statements included in our annual report onForm 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008. For liability-classified awards, such as cash-settled deferred stock units, fair values are determined based on the closing price of our common stock on the grant date and are remeasured based on the closing price of our common stock at the end of each reporting period through the date of settlement. See the “Grants of Plan-Based Awards” table for more information regarding the stock awards we granted in 2008.


35


Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation.  The amounts reported in the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column are attributable to the EICP awards earned in fiscal years 2006, 2007 and 2008, but paid in 2007, 2008 and 2009, respectively.
Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings.  The amounts reported in the “Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings” column represent the changes in actuarial present values of the accumulated benefits under defined benefit plans: at December 31, 2006, as compared to December 31, 2005, for fiscal year 2006; at December 31, 2007, as compared to December 31, 2006, for fiscal year 2007; and at December 31, 2008, as compared to December 31, 2007, for fiscal year 2008.
All Other Compensation.  The amounts reported for 2008 in the “All Other Compensation” column are attributable to the following:

Name and Principal
Position
 Year  Salary  Bonus  

Stock

Awards(1)

  

Option

Awards(1)

  

Non-Equity

Incentive Plan

Compensation(2)

  

Change in

Pension

Value and

Nonqualified

Deferred

Compensation

Earnings(3)

  

All Other

Compensation(4)

  Total 

S.M. Johnson

President and Chief

Executive Officer

  2011   $942,500   $0   $3,382,092   $944,089   $0    N/A   $132,099   $5,400,780  
  2010   $827,083   $0   $2,672,142   $865,313   $1,218,863    N/A   $163,683   $5,747,084  
  2009   $562,500   $0   $2,664,402   $1,435,394   $1,131,563    N/A   $83,929   $5,877,788  

P.L. Elders

  2011   $481,250   $0   $845,428   $236,000   $0    N/A   $76,763   $1,639,441  

Senior Vice President

and Chief Financial

Officer

  2010   $315,114   $0   $517,021   $396,788   $398,146    N/A   $14,059   $1,641,128  
  2009    N/A    N/A    N/A    N/A    N/A    N/A    N/A    N/A  

G.L. Carlson

Senior Vice President

and Chief

Administration Officer

  2011   $332,000   $0   $354,863   $94,406   $0    N/A   $120,619   $901,888  
  2010   $243,333   $0   $527,051   $165,771   $334,400    N/A   $106,850   $1,377,405  
  2009    N/A    N/A    N/A    N/A    N/A    N/A    N/A    N/A  

L.K. Hinrichs

Senior Vice President,

General Counsel and

Corporate Secretary

  2011   $435,575   $0   $792,653   $212,421   $0   $76,760   $77,550   $1,594,959  
  2010   $419,225   $0   $1,054,526   $276,912   $317,673   $121,620   $37,286   $2,227,242  
  2009    N/A    N/A    N/A    N/A    N/A    N/A    N/A    N/A  

J.T. McCormack

Executive Vice

President, Chief

Operating Officer

  2011   $447,381   $0   $915,194   $253,847   $0    N/A   $70,870   $1,687,292  
  2010    N/A    N/A    N/A    N/A    N/A    N/A    N/A    N/A  
  2009    N/A    N/A    N/A    N/A    N/A    N/A    N/A    N/A  

J.T. Nesser

Former Executive

Vice President, Chief

Operating Officer

  2011   $296,828   $0   $0   $0   $206,408   $163,357   $2,034,893   $2,701,486  
  2010   $509,381   $0   $1,196,240   $224,998   $609,729   $160,951   $43,383   $2,744,682  
  2009   $500,000   $0   $418,899   $235,945   $595,000   $155,330   $93,156   $1,998,330  

(1)The amounts reported in this column represent the aggregate grant date fair value of stock awards or option awards, as applicable, granted to each Named Executive and computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. See the “Grants of Plan-Based Awards” table for more information regarding the stock awards and option awards we granted in 2011.
(2)The amounts reported in this column are attributable to the annual incentive awards earned in fiscal years 2009, 2010 and 2011, but paid in 2010, 2011 and 2012, respectively. The amount reported for Mr. Nesser is his 2011 target EICP award, prorated to take into account his length of service in 2011. See the “Grants of Plan-Based Awards” table for more information regarding the annual incentive awards earned in 2011.
(3)The amounts reported in this column represent the changes in actuarial present values of the accumulated benefits under defined benefit plans, determined by comparing the prior completed fiscal year end amount to the covered fiscal year end amount.

(4)The amounts reported in this column for 2011 are attributable to the following:

All Other Compensation

                         
        Service-Based
          
  SERP
  Thrift
  Thrift
  Tax
       
  Contribution  Match  Contribution  Gross-Ups  Perquisites  Other 
 
J.A. Fees $54,155  $10,601     $15,280  $68,274    
B.W. Wilkinson $94,500  $4,688  $9,200        $2,151,442 
M.S. Taff $31,125  $6,902  $6,904  $826       
B.C. Bethards $31,042  $4,603     $1,020  $18,166    
R.A. Deason $51,400  $4,691     $25,220  $35,766    
J.T. Nesser, III $44,926  $6,629     $8,213  $15,165    
Thrift Match and Service-Based Thrift Contribution.  For information regarding our Thrift Plan matching contributions and service-based Thrift Plan contributions, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Postemployment Compensation — Retirement Plans” above.
TaxGross-Ups.  The taxgross-ups reported for 2008 under “All Other Compensation” are attributable to the following:

   

Deferred

Compensation Plan

Contribution(A)

  Thrift  Match(B)  Service-Based
Thrift
Contribution(B)
  Perquisites(C)  Tax
Gross-Ups(D)
  Other(E) 

S. M. Johnson

 $97,932   $6,817   $7,350   $20,000          

P. L. Elders

 $39,950   $7,350   $7,350   $20,000       $2,113  

G. L. Carlson

 $24,800   $6,030   $7,350   $68,606   $11,720   $2,113  

L. K. Hinrichs

 $43,511   $6,689   $7,350   $20,000          

J. T. McCormack

 $36,170   $7,350   $7,350   $20,000          

J. T. Nesser

 $55,219   $6,608   $7,350   $21,525       $1,944,191  

 • (A)Mr. Fees: Mr. Fees received taxgross-ups of $14,587 associated with income imputed to him as a result of his relocation from Virginia to Texas, following his appointment as Chief Executive Officer of McDermott. In addition, Mr. Fees received a taxgross-up of $693The amounts reported in this column are attributable to income imputed to him as a result of his spouse accompanying him on business travel.contributions made by McDermott under the Deferred Compensation Plan.
 • (B)Mr. Taff: Mr. Taff received a taxgross-up associated with income imputedThe amounts reported in these columns are attributable to himcontributions made under our defined contribution plan, which we refer to as a result of his spouse accompanying him on business travel.our Thrift Plan.
 • (C)The amounts reported in this column are attributable to a lump-sum perquisite allowance in the amount of $20,000 received by certain officers of McDermott in 2011, including each of the Named Executives. With the exception of an executive physical required by McDermott, the perquisite allowance was permitted to be used for any purpose determined by the recipient. Additionally, the amount reported for Mr. Bethards: Mr. Bethards received taxgross-ups associated with income imputed to him as a result of his relocation from Ohio to Virginia, following his appointment as Chief Executive Officer of The Babcock & Wilcox Company.
• Mr. Deason: Mr. Deason received taxgross-ups associated with income imputed to him as a result of his spouse accompanying him on business travel.
• Mr. Nesser: Mr. Nesser received taxgross-ups associated with income imputed to him as a result of his spouse accompanying him on business travel.
Perquisites.  Perquisites and other personal benefits received by a Named Executive are not included if their aggregate value does not exceed $10,000. For Messrs. Fees, Bethards and Deason, the values of the perquisites and other personal benefits reported for 2008 are as follows:
• Mr. Fees: $60,475 isCarlson includes $48,606 attributable to the costs of providing him relocation assistance in connection with his move from VirginiaColorado to Texas. The remainderamount reported for Mr. Nesser includes a gift in connection with his retirement from McDermott.
(D)The amount reported in this column for Mr. Carlson is attributable to tax gross-ups associated with income imputed to him as a result of amounts we paid to Mr. Carlson by reason of expenses he incurred in connection with his relocation.
(E)The amounts reported in this column for Messrs. Elders and Carlson are attributable to the cost to McDermott for the Named Executive’s spouse to accompany the Named Executive, at McDermott’s request, to attend the 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders in Panama City, Panama. The amount reported in this column for Mr. Nesser is attributable to: (1) payments made pursuant to Mr. Nesser’s Separation Agreement consisting of (a) a club membershipcash severance payment in the amount of $1,742,527, (b) two times the full annual cost of coverage for medical, dental and vision benefits in the costs resulting from hisamount of $35,127, (c) unused vacation for 2011 in the amount of $39,424 and (d) consulting fees in the amount of $125,000; and (2) the cost to McDermott for Mr. Nesser’s spouse accompanyingto accompany him, on business travel.at McDermott’s request, to attend the 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders in Panama City, Panama in the amount of $2,113. For more information regarding Mr. Nesser’s Separation Agreement, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Employment and Severance Arrangements — Employment and Separation Agreements” above.


36


GRANTSOF PLAN-BASED AWARDS

• Mr. Bethards: $17,070 is attributable to the costs of providing him relocation assistance in connection with his move from Ohio to Virginia. The remainder is attributable to the costs resulting from his spouse accompanying him on business travel.
• Mr. Deason: This amount is attributable to the costs resulting from his spouse accompanying him on business travel.
• Mr. Nesser: This amount is attributable to the costs resulting from his spouse accompanying him on business travel.
Other.  The amounts reported for Mr. Wilkinson include $57,692 of accrued but unused vacation and $2,093,750 paid by us for consulting services pursuant to a Consultancy Agreement. For more information regarding Mr. Wilkinson’s Consultancy Agreement, see “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control” below.


37


Grants of Plan-Based Awards
The following Grants of Plan-Based Awards table provides additional information about stock awards and equity and non-equity incentive plan awards we granted to our Named Executives during the year ended December 31, 2008.
                                                 
                          All Other
  All Other
       
                          Stock
  Option
     Grant
 
                          Awards:
  Awards:
  Exercise
  Date Fair
 
        Estimated Possible Payouts Under
  Estimated Future Payouts Under
  Number of
  Number of
  or Base
  Value of
 
     Committee
  Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards  Equity Incentive Plan Awards  Shares of
  Securities
  Price of
  Stock and
 
  Grant
  Action
           Threshold
  Target
  Maximum
  Stock
  Underlying
  Option
  Option
 
Name
 Date  Date  Threshold  Target  Maximum  (#)  (#)  (#)  or Units  Options  Awards  Awards 
 
J.A. Fees  02/25/08   02/25/08  $100,088  $471,000  $942,000   8,327   33,310   49,965           $1,753,772 
   03/03/08   02/25/08                        9,240        $486,486 
   03/03/08   02/25/08               36,135   144,540   216,810           $3,597,601 
   10/01/08   09/03/08                        40,080        $997,591 
   10/01/08   09/03/08                                         
B.W. Wilkinson  02/25/08   02/25/08  $159,375  $750,000  $1,500,000                             
M.S. Taff  02/25/08   02/25/08  $51,425  $242,000  $484,000   6,215   24,860   37,290           $1,308,879 
   03/03/08   02/25/08                        6,890        $362,759 
   03/03/08   02/25/08                                         
B.C. Bethards  02/25/08   02/25/08  $58,727  $276,360  $552,720   3,545   14,180   21,270           $746,577 
   03/03/08   02/25/08                        3,930        $206,915 
   03/03/08   02/25/08                        26,000        $254,020 
   11/10/08   11/03/08                                         
R.A. Deason  02/25/08   02/25/08  $80,325  $378,000  $756,000   6,867   27,470   41,205           $1,446,296 
   03/03/08   02/25/08                        7,620        $401,193 
   03/03/08   02/25/08                                         
J.T. Nesser, III  02/25/08   02/25/08  $70,391  $331,250  $662,500   6,492   25,970   38,955           $1,367,321 
   03/03/08   02/25/08                        7,200        $379,080 
   03/03/08   02/25/08               5,232   20,930   31,395           $744,062 
   08/14/08   08/07/08                        5,810        $206,546 
   08/14/08   08/07/08                                         
Estimated Possible Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards
Our Compensation Committee administers the Executive Incentive Compensation Plan, a cash bonus incentive program, which we refer to as the EICP. The payment amount, if any, of an EICP award is determined based on: (1) the attainment of short-term financial goals; (2) the attainment of short-term individual goals; and (3) the exercise of the Compensation Committee’s discretionary authority. Each year, our Compensation Committee establishes financial goals and, with respect to our Chief Executive Officer, individual goals. Our Chief Executive Officer establishes individual goals for the other Named Executives.
The financial goals contain threshold, target and maximum performance levels which, if achieved, result in payments of 25%, 100% and 200% of the financial component, respectively. If the threshold financial goal is not achieved, no amount is paid on an EICP award under the financial component. For purposes of evaluating McDermott’s performance under the financial performance component, our Compensation Committee may adjust our results prepared in accordance with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”) for unusual, nonrecurring or other items in the Committee’s discretion. Payment is made on an EICP award under the individual component based on the attainment of the Named Executive’s individual goals as determined and evaluated by our Chief Executive Officer. In addition, our Compensation Committee may increase or decrease an EICP award in its discretion. The maximum EICP award a Named Executive can earn is 200% of his target EICP award.
The amounts shown reflect grants of 2008 EICP awards. In February 2008, our Compensation Committee established target EICP awards, expressed as a percentage of the Named Executive’s 2008 base salary. The amount shown in the “target” column represents the value of the target EICP award determined by multiplying the target percentage established for each Named Executive by the Named Executive’s 2008 base salary. For 2008, the target


38

2011.


percentage of each Named Executive was as follows: 79% for Mr. Fees, 100% for Mr. Wilkinson, 55% for Mr. Taff, 63% for Mr. Bethards, 70% for Mr. Deason and 66% for Mr. Nesser. Effective October 1, 2008, Messrs. Fees, Bethards and Nesser were promoted to new positions within our organization. As a result, their respective target EICP awards represent composites of their respective EICP target awards under their former and current positions, prorated based on the length of service in each position during 2008. Based upon this formula, Mr. Fees’ 2008 EICP target amount represents the combined prorated target award of his EICP target as President and Chief Executive Officer of The Babcock & Wilcox Company (three-fourths of 70% of $540,000) and as Chief Executive Officer of McDermott (one-fourth of 100% of $750,000). Mr. Bethard’s 2008 EICP target amount represents the combined prorated target award of his EICP target as President of Babcock & Wilcox Power Generation Group, Inc. (three-fourths of 60% of $409,500) and as President and Chief Executive Officer of The Babcock & Wilcox Company (one-fourth of 70% of $526,200). Mr. Nesser’s 2008 EICP target amount represents the combined prorated target award of his EICP target as Executive Vice President, Chief Administrative and Legal Officer of McDermott (three-fourths of 65% of $500,000) and Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of J. Ray McDermott, S.A. (one-fourth of 70% of $500,000). The amount shown in the “maximum” column represents the maximum amount payable under the EICP, which is 200% of the target amount shown. The amount shown in the “threshold” column represents the amount payable under the EICP assuming the threshold level of the financial goals, but no individual goal, is attained and our Compensation Committee did not exercise any discretion over the EICP award. The financial goal represents 85% of the target EICP award. Attaining only the threshold level, or 25%, of the financial goal results in an EICP payment of 21.25% of the target EICP award. See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Annual Bonus” on page 23 for more information about the 2008 EICP awards and performance goals.
On September 30, 2008, Mr. Wilkinson entered into a Separation Agreement. Under the terms of that agreement, Mr. Wilkinson is only entitled to receive a prorated EICP award based on his 2008 employment. As a result, his threshold, target and maximum award are three fourths of the amounts show in the table. See “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control” below for more information regarding Mr. Wilkinson’s Separation Agreement.
Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards
The amounts shown reflect grants of Performance Shares under our 2001 D&O Plan. Each grant represents a right to receive one share of McDermott common stock for each vested performance share. The amount of performance shares that vest, if any, will be determined on the third anniversary of the date of grant based on our cumulative operating income between January 1, 2008 and December 31, 2010. For purposes of evaluating McDermott’s cumulative operating income, our Compensation Committee may adjust our results prepared in accordance with GAAP for unusual, non-recurring or other items in the Committee’s discretion. The amounts shown in the “target” column represent the number of performance shares granted, which will vest under each grant if the target level of cumulative operating income is attained. The amounts shown in the “maximum” column represent the number of performance shares that will vest under each grant, which is 150% of the amount granted, if the maximum level of cumulative operating income is attained. The amounts shown in the “threshold” column represent the number of performance shares that will vest under each grant, which is 25% of the amount granted, if the minimum level of cumulative operating income is attained. No amount of performance shares will vest if the cumulative operating income achieved is less than the minimum performance level. See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Equity-Based Compensation” on page 29 for more information regarding the 2008 Performance Shares and threshold, target and maximum operating income performance levels.
All Other Stock Awards
The amounts shown reflect grants of Restricted Stock under our 2001 D&O Plan. The shares of Restricted Stock will generally vest in one-third increments on the first, second and third anniversaries of the date of grant. Upon vesting, the shares of Restricted Stock are released and the restrictions on the stock are removed. See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Equity-Based Compensation” on page 29 for more information regarding the 2008 Restricted Stock.

Name

 Grant Date  Committee
Action
Date
  Estimated Possible Payouts Under
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards(1)
 Estimated Future Payouts Under
Equity Incentive Plan Awards(2)
 

All Other

Stock
Awards:
Number of
Shares of

Stock

or Units(3)

 All Other
Option
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Options(4)
 Exercise
or Base
Price of
Option
Awards
 Grant Date
Fair Value
of Stock and
Option
Awards(5)
 
   Threshold Target Maximum Threshold
(#)
 

Target

(#)

 Maximum
(#)
    

S.M. Johnson

            

EICP

  02/28/11    02/28/11   $115,469 $942,603 $1,885,205          

PShares

  03/04/11    02/28/11      28,265 56,529 113,058    $2,382,132  

RSUs

  03/04/11    02/28/11         39,000   $999,960  

Stock Options

  03/04/11    02/28/11          98,133 $25.64 $944,089  

P.L. Elders

            

EICP

  02/28/11    02/28/11   $41,272 $336,911 $673,822          

PShares

  03/04/11    02/28/11      7,065 14,130 28,260    $595,438  

RSUs

  03/04/11    02/28/11         9,750   $249,990  

Stock Options

  03/04/11    02/28/11          24,531 $25.64 $236,000  

G.L. Carlson

            

EICP

  02/28/11    02/28/11   $24,406 $199,233 $398,466          

PShares

  03/04/11    02/28/11      2,826 5,652 11,304    $238,175  

RSUs

  03/04/11    02/28/11         4,551   $116,688  

Stock Options

  03/04/11    02/28/11          9,813 $25.64 $94,406  

L.K. Hinrichs

            

EICP

  02/28/11    02/28/11   $32,019 $261,381 $522,763          

PShares

  03/04/11    02/28/11      6,359 12,717 25,434    $535,894  

RSUs

  03/04/11    02/28/11         10,014   $256,759  

Stock Options

  03/04/11    02/28/11          22,080 $25.64 $212,421  

J.T. McCormack

            

EICP

  02/28/11    02/28/11   $33,632 $274,549 $549,098          

PShares

  03/04/11    02/28/11      3,285 6,570 13,140    $276,860  

RSUs

  03/04/11    02/28/11         4,533   $116,226  

Stock Options

  03/04/11    02/28/11          11,406 $25.64 $109,731  

PShares

  05/13/11    05/06/11      5,637 11,274 22,548    $357,160  

RSUs

  05/13/11    05/06/11         8,058   $164,947  

Stock Options

  05/13/11    05/06/11          18,312 $20.47 $144,115  

J.T. Nesser

            

EICP

  02/28/11    02/28/11   $43,948 $358,756 $717,511          


39


Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards
The amounts included in the “Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards” column represent the full grant date fair values of the equity awards computed in accordance with SFAS No. 123R. Under SFAS No. 123R, the fair value of equity awards, such as performance shares, is determined on the date of grant and is not remeasured. Grant date fair values are determined using the closing price of our common stock on the date of grant. For more information regarding the compensation expense related to 2008 performance shares and other awards, see Note 10 to our consolidated financial statements included in our annual report onForm 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.

(1)This column reflects the threshold, target and maximum payout opportunities under the Executive Incentive Compensation Plan, or EICP. For 2011, the EICP awards were based 70% on the attainment of financial goals and 30% on the attainment of individual goals. The 70% financial component was based 70% on consolidated operating income and 30% on consolidated return on invested capital. The financial goals contain threshold, target and maximum performance levels which, if achieved, result in payments of 25%, 100% and 200% of the financial component, respectively. The threshold payout amount provided was determined based on achieving the consolidated operating income threshold (or 12.25% of the target amounts shown), which, if not achieved, would result in no amounts being paid on an EICP award.


40

On February 28, 2011, our Compensation Committee established target EICP awards expressed as a percentage of the Named Executive’s 2011 annual base salary earned, as follows: Mr. Johnson — 100%, Mr. Elders — 70%, Mr. Carlson — 60%, Ms. Hinrichs — 60%, Mr. McCormack — 50% and Mr. Nesser — 70%. With the exception of Mr. McCormack, the target amounts shown were computed according to the following formula: Target % * [(2010 base salary * 90/365) + (2011 base salary * 275/365)]. In connection with Mr. McCormack’s June 30, 2011 promotion to EVP, COO, on May 6, 2011 our Compensation Committee approved an increase in target EICP award for Mr. McCormack from 50% to 70% effective and for the period beginning June 30, 2011. Accordingly, the amount shown in Mr. McCormack’s target column reflects his target EICP award under his former and current positions, prorated based on the length of service in each position. The target amount shown for Mr. McCormack was computed according to the following formula: SVP Target % * [(2010 base salary * 90/365) + (2011 SVP base salary * 90/365)] + EVP, COO Target % * (2011 EVP, COO base salary * 185/365). The actual EICP payouts for the Named Executives for 2011 are provided in the Summary Compensation Table in the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column.


(2)

This column reflects the target, threshold and maximum payout opportunities of grants of performance shares under the 2009 LTIP. Each grant represents the right to receive one share of McDermott common stock for each vested performance share. The amount of performance shares that vest, if any, is scheduled to initially be determined on December 31, 2013 based on our total shareholder return relative to the Proxy Peer Group during the same period, with subsequent measurements of total shareholder return relative to the Proxy Peer Group on December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2015. The amounts shown in the “threshold” column represent the number of performance shares that will vest, which is 50% of the amount granted, and the amounts shown in the “maximum” column represent the number of performance shares that will vest, which is 200% of the amount granted, based on our total shareholder return relative to the Proxy Peer Group. The maximum number of performance shares which will vest based on performance through December 31, 2013 is 150% of the amount granted if our total shareholder return ranks in the 75th percentile or higher relative to the Proxy Peer Group. A maximum of 200% of the amount of performance shares granted may vest based on performance through December 31, 2014 and 2015, less any amount previously vested. The following table provides the measurement periods, total shareholder return percentile rank and corresponding vesting percentage of the amount of performance shares granted:

Measurement PeriodTotal Shareholder Return
Percentile Rank
Vesting Percentage of
Performance Shares  Granted

36 Months Ending December 31, 2013

³90th Percentile

     75th Percentile

     50th Percentile

     25th Percentile

< 25th Percentile

150%

150%

100%

50%

0%

48 Months Ending December 31, 2014

³90th Percentile

     75th Percentile

     50th Percentile

     25th Percentile

< 25th Percentile

200%*

150%*

100%*

50%*

0%*

60 Months Ending December 31, 2015

³90th Percentile

     75th Percentile

     50th Percentile

     25th Percentile

< 25th Percentile

200%*

150%*

100%*

50%*

0%*

*Lessany amounts vested through prior measurement periods.

(3)This column reflects grants of restricted stock units under the 2009 LTIP. Each restricted stock unit represents the right to receive one share of McDermott common stock and is generally scheduled to vest in one-third increments on the first, second and third anniversaries of the date of grant. Upon vesting, the restricted stock units are converted into shares of McDermott common stock.

(4)This column reflects grants of stock options under the 2009 LTIP. Each grant represents the right to purchase at the exercise price shares of McDermott common stock over a period of seven years. The stock options are generally scheduled to vest and become exercisable in one-third increments on the first, second and third anniversaries of the date of grant.

(5)This column reflects the full grant date fair values of the equity awards computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. Grant date fair values are determined using the closing price of our common stock on the date of grant for restricted stock units, a Monte Carlo simulation model for performance shares, and the Black-Scholes option pricing model for stock options. The Monte Carlo simulation model for performance shares and the Black-Scholes option pricing model for stock options each requires various assumptions, including but not limited to the expected life of the award and stock return and stock price volatility. For more information regarding the compensation expense related to 2011 awards, and a discussion of valuation assumptions utilized in performance share and option pricing, see Note 8 to our consolidated financial statements included in our annual report on form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.

OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDSAT FISCAL YEAR-END

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End
The following Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End table summarizes the equity awards we have made to our Named Executives which were outstanding as of December 31, 2008.
                                      
  Option Awards  Stock Awards
                 Equity
 Equity
      Equity
          Incentive
 Incentive
      Incentive
          Plan Awards:
 Plan Awards:
      Plan Awards:
          Number of
 Market or
  Number of
 Number of
 Number of
      Number of
   Unearned
 Payout Value
  Securities
 Securities
 Securities
      Shares or
   Shares, Units
 of Unearned
  Underlying
 Underlying
 Underlying
      Units of
 Market Value of
 or Other
 Shares, Units
  Unexercised
 Unexercised
 Unexercised
 Option
 Option
  Stock that
 Shares or Units of
 Rights that
 or Other
  Options
 Options
 Unearned
 Exercise
 Expiration
  have not
 Stock that have
 have not
 Rights that
Name
 Exercisable Unexercisable Options Price Date  Vested not Vested Vested have not Vested
J.A. Fees                  58,500  $577,980.00         
                        36,000  $355,680.00         
                        9,240  $91,291.20         
                        40,080  $395,990.40         
                        18,300  $180,804.00         
                                42,400  $418,912.00 
                                8,327  $82,270.76 
                                36,135  $357,013.80 
B.W. Wilkinson                  90,000  $889,200.00         
                        42,132  $416,264.16         
                                56,000  $553,280.00 
M.S. Taff  23,000        $7.1933   06/08/15                  
                        24,750  $244,530.00         
                        6,890  $68,073.20         
                        9,000  $88,920.00         
                                22,000  $217,360.00 
                                6,215  $61,404.20 
B.C. Bethards                  22,500  $222,300.00         
                        3,930  $38,828.40         
                        26,000  $256,880.00         
                                29,600  $292,448.00 
                                3,545  $35,024.60 
R.A. Deason  30,540        $6.7267   05/12/15                  
                        54,000  $533,520.00         
                        7,620  $75,285.60         
                        16,452  $162,545.76         
                                36,800  $363,584.00 
                                6,867  $67,845.96 
J.T. Nesser, III                  40,500  $400,140.00         
                        7,200  $71,136.00         
                        5,810  $57,402.80         
                        12,780  $126,266.40         
                                35,000  $345,800.00 
                                6,492  $64,140.96 
                                5,232  $51,692.16 
                                      
Option Awards.  Information presented in the “Option Awards” columns relates to options to purchase shares of our common stock held by our Named Executives as of December 31, 2008. All options were granted ten years prior to the option expiration date reported and vest in three equal installments on the first, second and third anniversaries of the grant date. All options held by our Named Executives are fully vested. As of December 31, 2008, we had not granted any options to our Named Executives since 2005.
Stock Awards.  Information presented in the Stock Awards columns relates to awards of restricted stock, deferred stock units and performance shares held by our Named Executives as of December 31, 2008. The awards reported in the “Equity Incentive Plan Awards” columns consist entirely of performance shares. Performance shares


41

2011.


where the performance conditions have been satisfied, restricted stock and deferred stock units are reported in the “Number of Shares or Units of Stock that have not Vested” column.
Restricted Stock.  Shares of restricted stock will vest in one-third increments on the first, second and third anniversaries of the date of grant. The market value of restricted stock reported in the Stock Awards column is based on the closing price of our common stock as of December 31, 2008 ($9.88), as reported on the New York Stock Exchange. The shares reported in the Stock Awards column attributable to restricted stock are as follows:
Restricted Stock Awards

     Option Awards(1)  Stock Awards 
Name Grant
Date
  

Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options

Exercisable

  Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Unexercisable
  Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Unearned
Options
 

Option

Exercise
Price

  Option
Expiration
Date
  Number of
Shares or
Units of
Stock
That Have
Not
Vested(2)
  Market
Value of
Shares or
Units of
Stock
That
Have Not
Vested(4)
  

Equity
Incentive
Plan Awards:
Number of
Unearned
Shares,

Units or
Other

Rights That
Have

Not Vested(5)

  

Equity
Incentive
Plan Awards:
Market

or Payout
Value of
Unearned
Shares,

Units or
Other

Rights That
Have

Not Vested(4)

 

S.M. Johnson

          

Stock Options

  05/14/09    170,496    85,248    $9.36    05/14/16      

Stock Options

  03/04/10    47,199    94,398    $13.09    03/04/17      

Stock Options

  03/04/11        98,133    $25.64    03/04/18      

RSU

  05/14/09         60,075   $691,463          

RSU(3)

  05/14/09         104,302   $1,200,516          

RSU

  03/04/10         63,663   $732,761        ���  

RSU

  03/04/11         39,000   $448,890          

Performance Shares

  03/04/11                 28,265   $325,330  

P.L. Elders

          

Stock Options

  05/13/10    20,097    40,195    $13.37    05/13/17      

Stock Options

  03/04/11        24,531    $25.64    03/04/18      

RSU

  05/13/10         25,774   $296,659          

RSU

  03/04/11         9,750   $112,223          

Performance Shares

  03/04/11                 7,065   $81,318  

G.L. Carlson

          

Stock Options

  05/13/10    8,396    16,793    $13.37    03/29/17      

Stock Options

  03/04/11        9,813    $25.64    03/04/18      

RSU

  05/13/10         26,274   $302,414          

RSU

  03/04/11         4,551   $52,382          

Performance Shares

                2,826   $32,527  

L.K. Hinrichs

          

Stock Options

  03/05/09        27,203    $5.64    03/05/16      

Stock Options

  03/04/10    15,104    30,209    $13.09    03/04/17      

Stock Options

  03/04/11        22,080    $25.64    03/04/18      

RSU

  03/05/09         19,169   $220,635          

RSU(3)

  03/05/09         33,283   $383,087          

RSU

  03/04/10         20,371   $234,470          

RSU

  03/04/11         10,014   $115,261          

Performance Shares

  03/04/11                 6,359   $73,192  

J.T. McCormack

          

Stock Options

  03/05/09        14,155    $5.64    03/05/16      

Stock Options

  03/04/10  �� 8,518    17,037    $13.09    03/04/17      

Stock Options

  03/04/11        11,406    $25.64    03/04/18      

Stock Options

  05/13/11        18,312    $20.47    05/13/18      

RSU

  03/05/09         9,974   $114,800          

RSU(3)

  03/05/09         17,316   $199,307          

RSU

  03/04/10         11,490   $132,250          

RSU

  03/04/11         4,533   $52,175          

Performance Shares

  03/04/11                 3,285   $37,810  

RSU

  05/13/11         8,058   $92,748          

Performance Shares

  05/13/11                 5,637   $64,882  

J.T. Nesser

          

Stock Options

  03/05/09    45,172        $5.64    03/05/16      

Stock Options

  03/04/10    12,273    24,545    $13.09    03/04/17      

RSU

  03/04/10         16,184   $186,278          

(1)The awards in this column represent grants of stock options, which generally become exercisable in accordance with the following vesting schedule:

Grant Date  Vesting Schedule:

03/05/09

  1/3 per year on first, second and third anniversaries of grant date

05/14/09

  1/3 per year on first, second and third anniversaries of grant date

03/04/10

  Number1/3 per year on first, second and third anniversaries of
grant date

05/13/10

  Mr. Elders: 1/3 per year on first, second and third anniversaries of grant date

05/13/10

  Unvested SharesMr. Carlson: 1/3 per year on March 29, 2011, 2012 and 2013 (the first, second and third anniversaries of
Mr. Carlson’s hire date)

03/04/11

  1/3 per year on first, second and third anniversaries of grant date
Name

05/13/11

  Restricted Stock1/3 per year on first, second and third anniversaries of grant date

(2)The awards in this column represent grants of restricted stock units, which, with the exception of those grants of restricted stock units discussed in Note (3) below, generally vest in accordance with the following vesting schedule:

Grant Date  
Vesting Date
Schedule:
J.A. Fees

03/05/09

  1/3 per year on first, second and third anniversaries of grant date
9,240

05/14/09

  3,080 shares vest each1/3 per year on
March 3, 2009, 2010 first, second and 2011third anniversaries of grant date

03/04/10

  1/3 per year on first, second and third anniversaries of grant date
40,080

05/13/10

  13,360 shares vest eachMr. Elders: 1/3 per year on
Oct. 1, 2009, 2010 first, second and 2011third anniversaries of grant date
B.W. Wilkinson

05/13/10

  Mr. Carlson: 1/3 per year on March 29, 2011, 2012 and 2013 (the first, second and third anniversaries of Mr. Carlson’s hire date)

03/04/11

  1/3 per year on first, second and third anniversaries of grant date
M.S. Taff

05/13/11

  1/3 per year on first, second and third anniversaries of grant date

(3)6,890The grant of restricted stock units was converted from an original grant of performance shares in connection with the Spin-off and generally vests 100% on the third anniversary of the grant date.

(4)Market values in these columns are based on the closing price of our common stock as reported on the New York Stock Exchange as of December 30, 2011 ($11.51).

(5)2,296The awards in this column represent grants of performance shares, which generally may vest on March 3, 2009;
2,297the third, fourth and/or fifth anniversaries of the grant date based on the attainment of performance levels as of December 31, 2013, 2014 and 2015. The number and value of performance shares vestreported is based on March 3, 2010;
2,296 shares vest on March 3, 2011
B.C. Bethards3,9301,310 shares vest each year on
March 3, 2009, 2010 and 2011
26,0008,667 shares vest on Nov. 10, 2009;
8,666 shares vest on Nov. 10, 2010;
8,667 shares vest on Nov. 10, 2011
R.A. Deason7,6202,540 shares vest each year on
March 3, 2009, 2010 and 2011
J.T. Nesser, III7,2002,400 shares vest each year on
March 3, 2009, 2010 and 2011
5,8101,937 shares vest on Aug. 14, 2009;
1,936 shares vest on Aug. 14, 2010;
1,937 shares vest on Aug. 14, 2011achieving threshold performance as of the December 31, 2013 measurement date.
Deferred Stock Units.  Deferred stock units are settled in cash in an amount equal to the number of vested units multiplied by the average of the highest and lowest price of our common stock on the date of vesting. Deferred stock units vest in five equal installments on each anniversary of the date of grant. The market value of deferred stock units reported in the Stock Awards column is based on the closing price of our common stock as of December 31, 2008 ($9.88), as reported on the New York Stock Exchange. The amounts of Stock Awards reported in the Stock Awards column attributable to deferred stock units are as follows:
Deferred Stock Units
Number of
Unvested Deferred
Name
Stock Units
Vesting Date
J.A. Fees18,3009,150 units vest each year on
May 12, 2009 and 2010
B.W. Wilkinson42,13221,066 units vest each year on
May 12, 2009 and 2010
M.S. Taff9,0004,500 units vest each year on
May 12, 2009 and 2010
B.C. Bethards
R.A. Deason16,4528,226 units vest each year on
May 12, 2009 and 2010
J.T. Nesser III12,7806,390 units vest each year on
May 12, 2009 and 2010


42


OPTION EXERCISESAND STOCK VESTED

Performance Shares.  Performance share awards represent the right to receive one share of our common stock for each performance share that becomes vested on the third anniversary of the date of grant. The number of performance shares that vest depends on the attainment of specified performance levels. The number and value reported under the Stock Awards column for the 2006 performance shares are based on attaining the maximum performance level, or 150% of the performance shares granted. The number and value reported under the Stock Awards column for the 2007 performance shares are based on attaining the target performance level, or 100% of the performance shares granted. The number and value reported under the Stock Awards column for the 2008 performance shares are based on attaining the threshold performance level, or 25% of the performance shares granted. See the “Grants of Plan-Based Awards” table for more information about performance shares. The amount and vesting of performance shares reported in the Stock Awards column are as follows:
Performance Shares
             
     Number of
    
  Performance Share
  Unvested
    
Name
 Grant Year  Performance Shares  Vesting Date 
 
J.A. Fees  2006   58,500   05/08/09 
       36,000   11/07/09 
   2007   42,400   05/10/10 
   2008   8,327   03/03/11 
       36,135   10/01/11 
B.W. Wilkinson  2006   90,000   05/08/09 
   2007   56,000   05/10/10 
M.S. Taff  2006   24,750   05/08/09 
   2007   22,000   05/10/10 
   2008   6,215   03/03/11 
B.C. Bethards  2006   22,500   05/08/09 
   2007   29,600   05/10/10 
   2008   3,545   03/03/11 
R.A. Deason  2006   54,000   05/08/09 
   2007   36,800   05/10/10 
   2008   6,867   03/03/11 
J.T. Nesser, III  2006   40,500   05/08/09 
   2007   35,000   05/10/10 
   2008   6,492   03/03/11 
       5,232   08/14/11 


43


Option Exercises and Stock Vested
The following Option Exercises and Stock Vested table provides additional information about the value realized by our Named Executives on exercises of option awards and vesting of stock awards during the year ended December 31, 2008.
                 
  Option Awards  Stock Awards 
  Number of
     Number of
    
  Shares
     Shares
    
  Acquired
  Value Realized
  Acquired
  Value Realized
 
Name
 on Exercise  on Exercise  on Vesting  on Vesting 
 
J.A. Fees  76,605  $3,841,524.01   9,150  $486,276.75 
B.W. Wilkinson  812,760  $32,032,855.06   103,266  $5,878,110.57 
M.S. Taff  22,000  $1,186,303.23   4,500  $295,571.25 
B.C. Bethards  4,120  $172,311.60   0   N/A 
R.A. Deason  0   N/A   83,226  $4,778,920.77 
J.T. Nesser, III  186,390  $9,483,852.09   34,590  $1,972,094.55 
Option Awards.  Each stock option exercise reported in the Option Exercises and Stock Vested table was effected as a simultaneous exercise and sale, with the exception of one stock option exercise and hold (representing 174,560 shares) by Mr. Wilkinson. For simultaneous exercise and sales, the value realized on exercise was calculated based on the difference between the exercise prices of the stock options and the prices at which the shares were sold. For the exercise of options for 174,560 shares by Mr. Wilkinson, the value realized on exercise was calculated based on the difference between the exercise price of the stock options and the average of the highest and lowest price of our common stock on the date of exercise. Three of the exercises of Mr. Fees (representing 12,000 shares) and all of the stock option exercises of Mr.  Wilkinson that were effected through simultaneous exercise and sale were made pursuant to a 10b5-1 trading plan.
Stock Awards.  For each Named Executive, the number of shares acquired on vesting reported in the Option Exercises and Stock Vested table represents the aggregate number of shares that vested during 2008 in connection with awards of restricted stockand/or deferred stock units. Awards of deferred stock units are payable entirely in cash. As a result, no shares of stock were actually acquired upon the vesting of the deferred stock units. See the Outstanding Equity Awards table for more information on the settlement of deferred stock unit awards. The following table sets forth the amount of shares attributable to restricted stock and deferred stock units, for each Named Executive:
                 
  Restricted Stock  Deferred Stock Units 
  Number of
     Number of
    
  Shares
     Shares
    
  Acquired
  Value Realized
  Acquired
  Value Realized
 
Name
 on Vesting  on Vesting  on Vesting  on Vesting 
 
J.A. Fees  0   N/A   9,150  $486,276.75 
B.W. Wilkinson  82,200  $4,758,558.00   21,066  $1,119,552.57 
M.S. Taff  0   N/A   4,500  $295,571.25 
B.C. Bethards  0   N/A   0   N/A 
R.A. Deason  75,000  $4,341,750.00   8,226  $437,170.77 
J.T. Nesser,III  28,200  $1,632,498.00   6,390  $339,596.55 
The number of shares acquired in connection with the vesting of restricted stock awards includes 29,962, 27,338 and 10,279 shares withheld by us at the election of Messrs. Wilkinson, Deason and Nesser, respectively, to pay the minimum withholding tax due upon vesting. For more information on the withholding of shares to cover taxes due upon vesting, see the “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions” section of this proxy statement.


44

2011.


   Option Awards(1)   Stock Awards(2) 
Name  

Shares

Acquired

on Exercise (#)

   

Value Realized

on Exercise

   

Shares

Acquired

on Vesting (#)

   

Value Realized

on Vesting

 

S. M. Johnson

   0     N/A     205,316    $4,333,356  

P. L. Elders

   0     N/A     12,887    $263,797  

G. L. Carlson

   0     N/A     13,137    $327,374  

L. K. Hinrichs

   27,202    $526,200     119,901    $2,679,780  

J. T. McCormack

   14,154    $273,959     29,822    $762,999  

J. T. Nesser

   0     N/A     85,423    $2,036,053  

(1)Each stock option exercise reported was effected as a simultaneous exercise and sale. The value realized on exercise was calculated based on the difference between the exercise prices of the stock options and the prices at which the shares were sold.

(2)The number of shares acquired on vesting reported represents the aggregate number of shares that vested during 2011 in connection with awards of restricted stock and restricted stock units. The value realized on vesting was calculated based on the fair market value of the underlying shares on the vesting date. The following table sets forth the amounts of shares attributable to restricted stock and restricted stock units for each Named Executive and the value realized on vesting of each respective type of award, as well as the number of shares withheld by McDermott to satisfy the minimum statutory withholding tax due upon vesting:

   Restricted Stock   Restricted Stock Units     
Name  Shares
Acquired
on Vesting (#)
   Value Realized
on Vesting
   Shares
Acquired
on Vesting (#)
   Value Realized
on Vesting
   Shares Acquired by McDermott
on Vesting of Stock Awards (#)
 

S. M. Johnson

   113,412    $2,287,520     91,904    $2,045,836     71,653  

P. L. Elders

   0     N/A     12,887    $263,797     3,408  

G. L. Carlson

   0     N/A     13,137    $327,374     3,474  

L. K. Hinrichs

   62,231    $1,204,301     57,670    $1,475,479     39,842  

J. T. McCormack

   1,196    $30,354     28,626    $732,645     7,957  

J. T. Nesser

   8,405    $192,972     77,018    $1,843,081     27,253  

Pension BenefitsPENSION BENEFITS

The following Pension Benefits table shows the present value of accumulated benefits payable to each of our Named Executives under ourthe qualified defined benefit pension plan (referred to as the Retirement Plan) and nonqualified pension plans.

plan (referred to as the Excess Plan) that we sponsor.

Name Plan Name  Number of
Years Credited
Service
   Present Value of
Accumulated Benefit(1)
   Payments
During 2011
 

S. M. Johnson

 N/A   N/A     N/A     N/A  
 

N/A

   N/A     N/A     N/A  

P. L. Elders

 N/A   N/A     N/A     N/A  
 

N/A

   N/A     N/A     N/A  

G. L. Carlson

 N/A   N/A     N/A     N/A  
 

N/A

   N/A     N/A     N/A  

L. K. Hinrichs

 McDermott Retirement Plan   11.167    $369,359    $0  
 

McDermott Excess Plan

   11.167    $154,621    $0  

J. T. McCormack

 N/A   N/A     N/A     N/A  
 

N/A

   N/A     N/A     N/A  

J. T. Nesser

 McDermott Retirement Plan   11.75    $468,199    $0  
 

McDermott Excess Plan

   11.75    $527,248    $0
  

(1)The present value of accumulated benefits reflected above is based on a 4.8% discount rate and the IRS static table for valuation years beginning in 2012.

               
    Number of
  Present Value
    
    Years Credited
  of Accumulated
  Payments
 
Name
 
Plan Name
 Service  Benefit  During 2008 
 
J.A. Fees McDermott Qualified Retirement Plan  29.583  $1,073,502  $0 
  McDermott Excess Plan  29.583  $2,592,577  $0 
B.W. Wilkinson McDermott Qualified Retirement Plan  7.00  $242,631  $0 
  McDermott Excess Plan  7.00  $605,736  $0 
M.S. Taff N/A  N/A   N/A   N/A 
  N/A  N/A   N/A   N/A 
B.C. Bethards B&W Governmental Operations
  Qualified Retirement Plan
  35.00  $1,077,317  $0 
  B&W Governmental Operations
  Excess Plan
  35.00  $1,073,755  $0 
R.A. Deason N/A  N/A   N/A   N/A 
  N/A  N/A   N/A   N/A 
J.T. Nesser, III McDermott Qualified Retirement Plan  10.250  $261,707  $0 
  McDermott Excess Plan  10.250  $254,102  $0 

Overview of Qualified Plans.Plan  We maintain retirement plans that are.    The Retirement Plan is funded by trustsa trust and cover certaincovers eligible regular full-time employees of McDermott and its subsidiaries, as described below in the section entitled “Participation and Eligibility,Eligibility.except certain nonresidentNonresident alien employees who are not citizens of a European Community country or who do not earn income in the United States Canada or the United Kingdom.

• Messrs. Fees and Wilkinson participate in the Retirement Plan for Employees of McDermott Incorporated and Participating Subsidiary and Affiliated Companies (the “McDermott Qualified Retirement Plan”) for the benefit of the eligible employees of McDermott Incorporated and specific subsidiaries;
• Mr. Bethards participates in the Retirement Plan for Employees of Babcock & Wilcox Government Operations (the “B&W Government Operations Qualified Retirement Plan”) for the benefit of the eligible employees of The Babcock & Wilcox Company and our Governmental Operations segment; and
• Messrs. Deason and Taff doand temporary resident alien employees are not participate in our defined benefit plans. Mr. Nesser remains an employee of McDermott Incorporated and, as a result, he continues to participate in the McDermott Qualified Retirement Plan. For more information on our retirement plans, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Postemployment Compensation — Retirement Plans.”
Participation and Eligibility.  Generally, employees over the age of 21 years, who were hired before April 1, 2005, are eligible to participate in the McDermott QualifiedRetirement Plan. In reviewing pension benefits payable to our Named Executives, it is important to note:

Of the Named Executives, only Ms. Hinrichs and Mr. Nesser participate in the Retirement Plan; and

As of 2006, all new participation in the Retirement Plan was closed, and benefit accruals under the Retirement Plan were frozen for all participants, including Ms. Hinrichs and Mr. Nesser, as of June 30, 2010.

For more information on our retirement plans, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Retirement Plans.”

Participation and Eligibility.    The Retirement Plan includes provisions related to eligibility, participation and benefit formulas for employees who were employed by McDermott’s subsidiary J. Ray

McDermott Holdings, LLC and other designated affiliates thereof (collectively, the “JRM Coverage Group”), as well as for employees who were employed by McDermott Incorporated (now known as McDermott Investments, LLC) (collectively, the “MI Coverage Group”) and certain former salaried employees of a subsidiary of The Babcock & Wilcox Company who transferred to employment with McDermott Incorporated (collectively, “Former B&W Governmental Operations QualifiedCoverage Group”).

Generally, employees of participating employers who met a one-year service requirement were eligible to participate in the Retirement Plan, subject to the following:

For the MI Coverage Group (which includes Ms. Hinrichs and Mr. Nesser):

New participation in the Retirement Plan was closed effective April 1, 2006.

For participants with less than five years of service as of March 31, 2006 — Benefit accruals under the Retirement Plan were frozen as of that date, but cost-of-living increases continued to be paid, as discussed further below. Affected employees received service- based employer cash contributions to their Thrift Plan accounts. On June 30,

2010, the provision of the cost-of-living increase under the Retirement Plan was terminated, and, for affected participants, the Thrift Plan service-based contribution was replaced by a cash contribution equal to 3% of base pay, plus overtime pay, expatriate pay and commissions, which we refer to collectively as “thriftable earnings.”

For participants with more than five but less than ten years of service as of January 1, 2007 (which includes Mr. Nesser and Ms. Hinrichs) — A one-time irrevocable choice was offered to (1) continue benefit accruals under the Retirement Plan, or (2) freeze benefit accruals as of March 31, 2007, subject to annual cost-of-living increases, and receive instead service-based employer cash contributions to their Thrift Plan accounts. As of June 30, 2010, benefit accruals under the Retirement Plan were frozen altogether, and in lieu of any service-based cash contributions, affected participants now receive a cash contribution to their Thrift Plan accounts equal to 3% of thriftable earnings.

With respect to the cost-of-living increase, frozen accrued benefits of affected employees increased annually in line with increases in the Consumer Price Index, up to a maximum of 8% and a minimum of 1%, for each year the employee remained employed. As of June 30, 2010, the provision of the cost-of-living increase under the Retirement Plan was terminated, and the accrued benefits under the Retirement Plan were frozen altogether.

For the JRM Coverage Group (which includes Mr. McCormack), new participation was closed and benefit accruals were frozen effective April 1, 2003, with no cost-of-living allowance. Mr. McCormack did not meet the Plan’s one-year service requirement for eligibility to participate in the Retirement Plan prior to the participation closure for the JRM Coverage Group.

No Named Executives are included in the Former B&W Commercial Operations QualifiedCoverage Group.

Benefits.    Mr. Nesser and Ms. Hinrichs are the only Named Executives entitled to benefits under the Retirement Plan.

• For participants with less than five years of service as of March 31, 2006 — Benefit accruals were frozen as of that date. Affected employees now receive annual service-based company cash contributions to their Thrift Plan account.
• For participants with more than five but less than ten years of service as of January 1, 2007 — If a participant made an election to do so, benefit accruals were frozen as of March 31, 2007, with the electing participants now receiving annual service-based company cash contributions to their Thrift Plan accounts.
• Frozen accrued Their benefits of affected employees under these plans will increase annually in line with increases in the Consumer Price Index, up to a maximum of 8%, for each year the employee remains employed. For


45


further discussion on the service-based company cash contributions under the Thrift Plan, see the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Postemployment Compensation — Retirement Plans” on page 32.
Benefits.  Benefits under these plans are calculated under oneas follows: 1.2% of two formulas:
(1) For participating employees originally hired by our Power Generation Systems or Government Operations segment (“Tenured Employees”) before April 1, 1998 — benefits are based on years of credited service and final average cash compensation (including bonuses and commissions); and
(2) For participating employees hired before April 1, 1998 who are not Tenured Employees, and for participating employees hired on or after April 1, 1998 — benefits are based on years of credited service, final average cash compensation (excluding bonuses and commissions) and anticipated social security benefits. Final average cash compensation is based on each employee’s average annual earnings during the 60 successive months out of the 120 successive months before retirement in which such earnings were highest.
The present valuefinal average monthly compensation as of accumulated benefits reflectedJune 30, 2010 up to the Social Security limit times credited service up to 35 years, plus 1.65% of final average monthly compensation as of June 30, 2010 in excess of the Pension Benefit Table above is based on a 6.25% discount rateSocial Security limit times credited service up to 35 years. Final average monthly compensation excludes bonuses and the 1994 Group Annuity Mortality Table projected to 2005.
commissions.

Retirement and Early Retirement.Retirement.    Under each of these plans,the Retirement Plan, normal retirement is age 65. The normal form of payment is a single lifesingle-life annuity or a 50% joint and survivor annuity, depending on the employee’s marital status when payments are scheduled to begin. Early retirement eligibility and benefits under these plansthe Retirement Plan depend on the employee’s date of hire. Mr. Feeshire and Mr. Bethards are the only Named Executives currently eligible for early retirement.

For Tenured Employees hired before April 1, 1998 (which includes Messrs. Fees and Bethards):
• an employee is eligible for early retirement if the employee has completed at least 15 years of credited service and attained the age of 50; and
• early retirement benefits are based on the same formula as normal retirement, but the pension benefit is unreduced if the sum of the employee’s age and years of service equals 75 or greater at the date benefits commence; otherwise the pension benefit is reduced 4% for each “point” less than 75.
age.

For employees hired on or after April 1, 1998 (which includes Messrs. Wilkinson(including Mr. Nesser and Nesser)Ms. Hinrichs):

an employee is eligible for early retirement after completing at least 15 years of credited service and attaining the age of 55; and

early retirement benefits are based on the same formula as normal retirement, but the pension benefit is generally reduced 0.4% for each month that benefits commence before age 62.

• an employee is eligible for early retirement after completing at least 15 years of credited service and attaining the age of 55; and
• early retirement benefits are based on the same formula as normal retirement, but the pension benefit is generally reduced 0.4% for each month that benefits commence before age 62.

Ms. Hinrichs has not accrued enough credited service to be eligible for early retirement under the Retirement Plan. At Mr. Nesser’s resignation from employment with McDermott on July 29, 2011, he had not accrued enough credited service to be eligible for early retirement under the Retirement Plan.

Overview of Nonqualified Plans.Plan.    To the extent benefits payable under these qualified plansthe Retirement Plan are limited by Section 415(b) or 401(a)(17) of the Internal Revenue Code, pension benefits will be paid directly by ourthe applicable subsidiariessubsidiary of McDermott under the terms of the unfunded excess benefit plans (the “Excess Plans”)plan maintained by them.McDermott (referred to as the “Excess Plan”). Effective January 1, 2006, the Excess Plans werePlan was amended to limit the annual bonus payments taken into account in calculating the Tenured Employees’ Excess Plan benefits to the lesser of the actual bonus paid or 25% of the prior

year’s base salary. Furthermore, because benefits entitlement under the Excess Plan and the Retirement Plan are linked, benefits under the Excess Plan have been frozen since 2006 when benefit accruals under the Retirement Plan were frozen.

Mr. Nesser and Ms. Hinrichs each participate in the Excess Plan. Based on Mr. Nesser’s age and accrued service at his resignation from employment, he will not be entitled to commence benefit payments under the Excess Plan until normal retirement under the Retirement Plan.

 
• Messrs. Fees, Wilkinson and Nesser participate in the Restoration of Retirement Income Plan for Certain Participants in the Retirement Plan for Employees of McDermott Incorporated; and
• Mr. Bethards participates in the Restoration of Retirement Income Plan for Certain Participants in the Retirement Plan for Employees of Babcock & Wilcox Governmental Operations.


46


NONQUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation
The following Nonqualified Deferred Compensation table summarizes our Named Executives’ compensation under our nonqualified supplemental retirement plan.the McDermott International, Inc. Director and Executive Deferred Compensation Plan (the “Deferred Compensation Plan”). The compensation shown in the this table is entirely attributable to our Supplemental Employee Retirementthe Deferred Compensation Plan.

The Deferred Compensation Plan or SERP, established January 1, 2005.

                     
  Executive
  Registrant
  Aggregate
  Aggregate
  Aggregate
 
  Contributions in
  Contributions in
  Earnings in
  Withdrawals/
  Balance at
 
Name
 2008  2008  2008  Distributions  12/31/08 
 
J.A. Fees $0  $54,155.00  $(86,635.87) $0  $175,326.47 
B.W. Wilkinson $0  $94,500.00  $(432,591.48) $0  $735,346.17 
M.S. Taff $0  $31,125.00  $(37,495.49) $0  $64,599.18 
B.C. Bethards $0  $31,042.00  $(87,741.63) $0  $349,864.81 
R.A. Deason $0  $51,400.00  $(94,174.12) $0  $204,249.36 
J.T. Nesser, III $0  $44,926.00  $(268,068.06) $0  $410,903.14 
Our SERP is an unfunded, defined contribution retirement plan for directors and officers of McDermott and our operating segmentsits subsidiaries selected to participate by our Compensation Committee. Benefits under the SERPDeferred Compensa-

tion Plan are based on (1) the participating officer’sparticipant’s deferral account, which is comprised of the notional account balance reflecting any executive contributions of deferred compensation, and (2) the participant’s vested percentage in his or her company account, which is comprised of the notional account balance reflecting any company contributions. A participant is at the time of retirementall times 100% vested in his or termination. An officerher deferral account. A participant generally vests in his SERPor her company account 20% each year, subject to accelerated vesting for death, disability and termination without cause or termination within 24 months following a change in control. A participating officer’s vested account balance will be distributed to his designated beneficiary on the officer’s death.

 
Executive Contributions in 2008.  Employee contributions are not permitted under our SERP.
Registrant Contributions in 2008.  We make annual contributions to participating employees’ notional accounts equal to a percentage of the employee’s prior-year compensation. Under the terms of the SERP, the contribution percentage does not need to be the same for each participant. Additionally, our Compensation Committee may make a discretionary contribution to a participant’s account at any time.
For 2008, our contributions equaled 5% of the Named Executives’ base salaries and EICP awards paid in 2007. No discretionary contributions were made in 2008.
All our 2008 contributions are included in the Summary Compensation Table above as “All Other Compensation.”
Aggregate Earnings in 2008.  The amount reported in this table as earnings represents hypothetical accrued losses during 2008 on each Named Executive’s account. The accounts are “participant-directed” in that each participating officer

Name Executive
Contributions  in
2011(1)
  Company
Contributions  in
2011(2)
  Aggregate
Earnings
in  2011(3)
  

Aggregate
Withdrawals/

Distributions

  Aggregate
Balance
at  12/31/11(4)
 

S. M. Johnson

 $0   $97,932   ($9,651 $0   $164,908  

P. L. Elders

 $0   $39,950    $796   $0   $40,746  

G. L. Carlson

 $0   $24,800   ($286 $0   $24,514  

L. K. Hinrichs

 $0   $43,511    $0.00   $0   $134,570  

J. T. McCormack

 $0   $36,170    $1,383   $0   $37,553  

J. T. Nesser

 $0   $55,219   ($34,873 $0   $766,375  

(1)In November 2010, our Compensation Committee approved the deferral of eligible executives’ compensation beginning January 1, 2011. Under the terms of our Deferred Compensation Plan, an eligible executive may defer up to 50% of his or her annual salary and/or up to 100% of any bonus earned in any year.

(2)We make annual contributions to specified participants’ notional accounts equal to a percentage of the participant’s prior-year compensation. Under the terms of the Deferred Compensation Plan, the contribution percentage does not need to be the same for each participant. Additionally, our Compensation Committee may make a discretionary contribution to a participant’s account at any time. With the exception of Messrs. Elders and Carlson, for 2011, our contributions on behalf of Named Executives who were participants equaled 5% of the respective Named Executives’ base salaries and annual incentive compensation awards paid in 2010. Messrs. Elders and Carlson received a Company Contribution in an amount equal to 5% of their respective prior-year base salary paid. In addition, Messrs. Elders and Carlson received a discretionary contribution equal in value to 5% of their respective target bonus for 2010 and the value of their respective prior-year target base salaries they would have earned for the period January 1, 2010 through their respective hire dates. All of our 2011 contributions are included in the Summary Compensation Table above as “All Other Compensation.”

(3)The amounts reported in this column represent hypothetical accrued gains or losses during 2011 on each Named Executive’s account. The accounts are “participant-directed,” in that each participant personally directs the investment of contributions made on his or her behalf. As a result, any accrued gains or losses are attributable to the performance of the Named Executive’s notional mutual fund investments. No amount of the earnings shown is reported as compensation in the Summary Compensation Table.

(4)The amounts reported in this column consist of contributions made by McDermott and hypothetical accrued gains or losses as of December 31, 2011. The balances shown include contributions from previous years which have been reported as compensation to the Named Executives in the Summary Compensation Table for those years — to the extent a Named Executive was included in the Summary Compensation Table during those years. The amounts of such contributions previously included in the Summary Compensation Table and years reported are as follows: Mr. Johnson received a contribution from McDermott of $69,375 in 2010; Ms. Hinrichs received a contribution from McDermott of $29,549 in 2010; and Mr. Nesser received contributions from McDermott of $36,806, $55,104 and $44,926 in 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

As a result, any accrued gains or losses are attributable to the performance of the Named Executive’s notional mutual fund investments.

No amount of the earnings shown is reported as compensation in the Summary Compensation Table.
Aggregate Balance at12/31/08.  The balance of a participating officer’s account consists of contributions made by us and hypothetical accrued gains or losses. The balances shown represent the accumulated account values (including gains and losses) for each Named Executive as of December 31, 2008.


47


The2011, Messrs. Johnson, Elders, Carlson and McCormack are 20% vested in their respective Deferred Compensation Plan balances shown include contributions from previous years which have been reported as compensation to the Named Executivesa result of becoming participants in the SummaryDeferred Compensation Table for those years — to the extent a Named Executive was included in the Summary Compensation TablePlan during those years. The amounts and years reported are as follows:
         
Named Executive(1)
 Year  Amount Reported 
 
J.A. Fees  2007  $48,311.00 
   2006  $48,650.00 
B.W. Wilkinson  2007  $89,300.00 
   2006  $85,700.00 
M.S. Taff  2007  $20,705.85 
   2006   N/A 
R.A. Deason  2007  $46,651.25 
   2006  $43,648.44 
J.T. Nesser, III  2007  $39,325.00 
   2006  $36,214.40 
(1)Mr. Bethards is not included because he did not become a Named Executive until 2008.
As of January 1, 2009, each Named Executive is 80% vested in his SERP balance shown, except2011. Mr. Wilkinson and Mr. Taff. Mr. Wilkinson, who retired on September 30, 2008,Nesser is 100% vested in his SERPDeferred Compensation Plan balance shown,shown.

In May 2009, our Compensation Committee amended the Deferred Compensation Plan to vest Deferred Compensation Plan balances that were unvested as of December 31, 2008 (including future gains and losses thereon). Amounts allocated on or after January 1, 2009 vest pursuant to the termsparticipant’s vested percentage, based on years of his Separation Agreement. Mr. Taff, who did not begin participating in our SERP until 2006,participation. Accordingly, Ms. Hinrichs is 60%84.38% vested in his SERPher Deferred Compensation Plan balance shown.


48


POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATIONOR CHANGEIN CONTROL

Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control

The following tables show potential payments to certain of our Named Executives except Mr. Wilkinson, under existing contracts, agreements, plans or arrangements, whether written or unwritten, for various scenarios under which a payment would be due (assuming each is applicable) involving a change in control or termination of employment of each of our Named Executives, assuming a December 31, 20082011 termination date and, where applicable, using the closing price of our common stock of $9.88$11.51 (as reported on the New York Stock Exchange) as of December 31, 2008.30, 2011. These tables do not reflect amounts that would be payable to the Named Executives pursuant to benefits or awards that are already vested.

The amounts reported in the below tables for stock options, restricted stock units and performance shares represent the value of unvested and accelerated shares or units, as applicable, calculated by:

for stock options: multiplying the number of accelerated options by the difference between the exercise price and $11.51 (the closing price of our common stock on December 30, 2011, as reported on the New York Stock Exchange); and

for restricted stock units and performance shares: multiplying the number of accelerated shares or units by $11.51 (the closing price of our common stock on December 30, 2011, as reported on the New York Stock Exchange).

Mr. WilkinsonNesser retired from McDermott on September 30, 2008.July 29, 2011. In connection with his retirement, wea subsidiary of McDermott entered into a Separation Agreement providing thatwith Mr. WilkinsonNesser. Under the terms of the Separation Agreement, Mr. Nesser was entitled to receive the payments and benefits detailed in Section 1 of the Restructuring Transaction Retention Agreement entered into between Mr. Nesser and a subsidiary of McDermott in connection with the Spin-off. These payments and benefits included: (1) a conditional prorated bonuscash severance payment for 2008 in anthe amount that will depend on the 2008 bonus generally paid to other employees under our EICP;of $1,742,527, (2) continued vestingpayment of his outstanding equity awards through September 30, 2010;2011 target EICP award, prorated to take into account his length of service in 2011, in the amount of $206,408, (3) two times the full annual cost of coverage for medical, dental and (3)vision benefits in the amount of $35,127, (4) unused vacation for 2011 in the amount of $39,424, (5) the value of unvested and accelerated vestingstock options in the amount of $328,174, and (6) the value of unvested portionand accelerated restricted stock and restricted stock units in the amount of $547,034. Pursuant to the terms of his SERP account. Based on the vesting schedule ofSeparation Agreement, Mr. Wilkinson’s existing equity awards, his awardsNesser will also continue to vest in the following amounts through September 30, 2010: 42,132 shares of deferred24,545 stock options and 16,553 restricted stock units and, depending on the performance of the company, between 90,000 and 174,000 performance shares.as if he had remained employed by McDermott through March 4, 2013. The value of the 40% unvested portionstock options and restricted stock units, less a number of his SERP accountrestricted stock units that were forfeited in connection with the payment of certain taxes, will be determined on December 31, 2008 was equal to $294,138.March 4, 2012 and March 4, 2013. In addition, in October 2008, we entered into a separate Consultancy Agreement with Mr. Wilkinson providing that Mr. Wilkinson receive a lump-sum payment of $2 million and a seriesNesser received $25,000 per month for the performance of consulting payments.services as set forth in his Separation Agreement. As of December 31, 2008,2011, Mr. Wilkinson hasNesser had received $2,093,750 under this Consultancy Agreement.$125,000 for the provision of these consulting services.

 
JOHN A. FEES
                                 
           Involuntary
  Involuntary
          
Executive Payments
 Voluntary
  Early
  Normal
  not for Cause
  for Cause
  Change in
       
Upon Termination
 Termination  Retirement  Retirement  Termination  Termination  Control  Death  Disability 
 
Severance Payments $0  $0  $0  $201,923.08  $0  $3,650,790.00  $0  $0 
Executive Incentive Compensation Plan (EICP) $0  $0  $0  $0  $0  $471,000.00  $0  $0 
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (SERP) $0  $0  $70,130.59  $70,130.59  $0  $70,130.59  $70,130.59  $70,130.59 
Stock Options (unvested and accelerated) $0  $0  $0  $0  $0  $0  $0  $0 
Restricted Stock (unvested and accelerated) $0  $0  $487,281.60  $0  $0  $487,281.60  $487,281.60  $487,281.60 
Deferred Stock Units (unvested and accelerated) $0  $0  $179,157.00  $0  $0  $179,157.00  $179,157.00  $179,157.00 
Performance Shares (unvested and accelerated) $0  $0  $0  $0  $0  $4,197,765.00  $0  $0 
TaxGross-Up
 $0  $0  $0  $0  $0  $0  $0  $0 
 
 
TOTAL $0  $0  $736,569.19  $272,053.67  $0  $9,056,124.19  $736,569.19  $736,569.19 
 
 
MICHAEL S. TAFF
                                 
           Involuntary
  Involuntary
          
Executive Payments
 Voluntary
  Early
  Normal
  not for Cause
  for Cause
  Change in
       
Upon Termination
 Termination  Retirement  Retirement  Termination  Termination  Control  Death  Disability 
 
Severance Payments $0  $0  $0  $21,153.85  $0  $1,364,000.00  $0  $0 
Executive Incentive Compensation Plan (EICP) $0  $0  $0  $0  $0  $242,000.00  $0  $0 
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (SERP) $0  $0  $38,759.51  $38,759.51  $0  $38,759.51  $38,759.51  $38,759.51 
Stock Options (unvested and accelerated) $0  $0  $0  $0  $0  $0  $0  $0 
Restricted Stock (unvested and accelerated) $0  $0  $68,073.20  $0  $0  $68,073.20  $68,073.20  $68,073.20 
Deferred Stock Units (unvested and accelerated) $0  $0  $88,110.00  $0  $0  $88,110.00  $88,110.00  $88,110.00 
Performance Shares (unvested and accelerated) $0  $0  $0  $0  $0  $938,995.20  $0  $0 
TaxGross-Up
 $0  $0  $0  $0  $0  $830,242.43  $0  $0 
 
 
TOTAL $0  $0  $194,942.71  $59,913.36  $0  $3,570,180.34  $194,942.71  $194,942.71 
 
 


49


Estimated Value of Benefits to Be Received Upon Termination Due to Death or Disability

The following table shows the value of payments and other benefits due the Continuing Named Executives assuming their death or disability as of December 31, 2011.

   S.M. Johnson  P.L. Elders  G.L. Carlson  L.K. Hinrichs  J.T. McCormack 

Severance Payments

                    

EICP

                    

Deferred Compensation Plan(1)

 $131,926   $32,597   $19,611   $21,020   $30,042  

Stock Options(2) (unvested and accelerated)

 $0   $0   $0   $0   $0  

Restricted Stock Units(3) (unvested and accelerated)

 $3,073,630   $408,881   $354,796   $953,454   $591,280  

Performance Shares(4) (unvested)

 $650,649   $162,636   $65,055   $146,373   $205,384  

Total

 $3,856,205   $604,114   $439,462   $1,120,847   $826,706  

(1)The amounts reported represent 80% of Messrs. Johnson’s, Elders’, Carlson’s, and McCormack’s and 15.62% of Ms. Hinrichs’ respective Deferred Compensation Plan balance as of December 31, 2011 that would become vested on death or disability.

(2)Under the terms of the stock option awards outstanding for each of the Continuing Named Executives as of December 31, 2011, all unvested option awards would become vested and exercisable on death or disability. Due to the exercise price of the stock options outstanding and the closing price of our common stock on December 30, 2011, the aggregate value of stock options that would become vested and exercisable on death or disability for all Continuing Named Executives would be $0.

(3)Under the terms of the restricted stock unit awards outstanding for each of the Continuing Named Executives as of December 31, 2011, all unvested restricted stock unit awards would become vested and exercisable on death or disability.

(4)Under the terms of the performance share awards outstanding for each of the Continuing Named Executives as of December 31, 2011, 100% of the initial performance shares granted would vest on the third, fourth and fifth anniversary of the grant date on death or disability. The number of performance shares that would vest is the number of performance shares that would have vested based on actual performance had the Continuing Named Executive remained employed with McDermott until the third, fourth and fifth anniversaries of the grant date. Accordingly, each Continuing Named Executive may vest in a number of performance shares ranging from 0% — 200% of the initial performance shares granted, depending on McDermott’s total shareholder return relative to its peers during the applicable measurement periods. The amounts reported assume a total of 100% of the initial performance shares granted will vest during the applicable measurement periods, valued at the closing price of McDermott stock as reported on the NYSE on December 30, 2011, although the actual value of such performance shares that may vest on the third, fourth and fifth anniversary of the date of grant could be $0 for each Continuing Named Executive and up to $1,301,298 for Mr. Johnson, $325,273 for Mr. Elders, $130,109 for Mr. Carlson, $292,745 for Ms. Hinrichs, and $410,769 for Mr. McCormack, in each case representing a total of 200% of the initial performance shares granted. Additionally, the value of McDermott stock could be greater or less than the amount used to value the performance shares for this table.

BRANDON C. BETHARDS

                                 
           Involuntary
  Involuntary
          
Executive Payments
 Voluntary
  Early
  Normal
  not for Cause
  for Cause
  Change in
       
Upon Termination
 Termination  Retirement  Retirement  Termination  Termination  Control  Death  Disability 
 
Severance Payments $0  $0  $0  $70,834.62  $0  $1,605,120.00  $0  $0 
Executive Incentive Compensation Plan (EICP) $0  $0  $0  $0  $0  $276,360.00  $0  $0 
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (SERP) $0  $0  $139,945.92  $139,945.92  $0  $139,945.92  $139,945.92  $139,945.92 
Stock Options (unvested and accelerated) $0  $0  $0  $0  $0  $0  $0  $0 
Restricted Stock (unvested and accelerated) $0  $0  $295,708.40  $0  $0  $295,708.40  $295,708.40  $295,708.40 
Deferred Stock Units (unvested and accelerated) $0  $0  $0  $0  $0  $0  $0  $0 
Performance Shares (unvested and accelerated) $0  $0  $0  $0  $0  $871,119.60  $0  $0 
TaxGross-Up
 $0  $0  $0  $0  $0  $0  $0  $0 
 
 
TOTAL $0  $0  $435,654.32  $210,780.54  $0  $3,188,253.92  $435,654.32  $435,654.32 
 
 
ROBERT A. DEASON
                                 
           Involuntary
  Involuntary
          
Executive Payments
 Voluntary
  Early
  Normal
  not for Cause
  for Cause
  Change in
       
Upon Termination
 Termination  Retirement  Retirement  Termination  Termination  Control  Death  Disability 
 
                                 
Severance Payments $0  $0  $0  $36,346.15  $0  $1,836,000.00  $0  $0 
                                 
Executive Incentive Compensation Plan (EICP) $0  $0  $0  $0  $0  $378,000.00  $0  $0 
                                 
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (SERP) $0  $0  $81,699.74  $81,699.74  $0  $81,699.74  $81,699.74  $81,699.74 
                                 
Stock Options (unvested and accelerated) $0  $0  $0  $0  $0  $0  $0  $0 
                                 
Restricted Stock (unvested and accelerated) $0  $0  $75,285.60  $0  $0  $75,285.60  $75,285.60  $75,285.60 
                                 
Deferred Stock Units (unvested and accelerated) $0  $0  $161,065.08  $0  $0  $161,065.08  $161,065.08  $161,065.08 
                                 
Performance Shares (unvested and accelerated) $0  $0  $0  $0  $0  $1,486,001,40  $0  $0 
                                 
TaxGross-Up
 $0  $0  $0  $0  $0  $0  $0  $0 
 
 
                                 
TOTAL $0  $0  $318,050.42  $118,045.89  $0  $4,018,051.82  $318,050.42  $318,050.42 
 
 
JOHN T. NESSER, III
                                 
           Involuntary
  Involuntary
          
Executive Payments
 Voluntary
  Early
  Normal
  not for Cause
  for Cause
  Change in
       
Upon Termination
 Termination  Retirement  Retirement  Termination  Termination  Control  Death  Disability 
 
                                 
Severance Payments $0  $0  $0  $57,692.31  $0  $1,662,500.00  $0  $0 
                                 
Executive Incentive Compensation Plan (EICP) $0  $0  $0  $0  $0  $331,250.00  $0  $0 
                                 
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (SERP) $0  $0  $164,361.25  $164,361.25  $0  $164,361.25  $164,361.25  $164,361.25 
                                 
Stock Options (unvested and accelerated) $0  $0  $0  $0  $0  $0  $0  $0 
                                 
Restricted Stock (unvested and accelerated) $0  $0  $128,538.80  $0  $0  $128,538.80  $128,538.80  $128,538.80 
                                 
Deferred Stock Units (unvested and accelerated) $0  $0  $125,116.20  $0  $0  $125,116.20  $125,116.20  $125,116.20 
                                 
Performance Shares (unvested and accelerated) $0  $0  $0  $0  $0  $1,613,898.00  $0  $0 
                                 
TaxGross-Up
 $0  $0  $0  $0  $0  $0  $0  $0 
 
 
                                 
TOTAL $0  $0  $418,016.25  $222,053.56  $0  $4,025,664.25  $418,016.25  $418,016.25 
 
 
Severance Payments — Involuntary Not-For-Cause Termination.  Under our Severance Plan for EmployeesEstimated Value of McDermott Incorporated and Participating Subsidiary and Affiliated Companies, full-time employees of McDermott and participating subsidiaries are entitledBenefits to receive a severance benefitBe Received Upon Change in the event their employment is terminated because of the elimination of a previously required position or previously required service, or due to the consolidation of departments, abandonment of plants or offices, or technological change or declining business activities, where such termination is intended to be permanent. The amount of severance benefit is determined based on the length of service and the employee’s base salary. In general, an eligible employee is entitled to a severance benefit of one half week of base salary for each year of service, subject to a maximum of 14 weeks of pay.


50

Control


Change-in-Control Agreements.We havechange-in-control agreements with various officers, including each of our Continuing Named Executives. Generally, under these agreements, if a Continuing Named Executive is terminated within one year following a change in control either (1) by the company for any reason other than cause or death or disability;disability, or (2) by the Continuing Named Executive for good reason, the companyMcDermott is required to pay the Continuing Named Executive a cash severance payment anbased on the Continuing Named Executives’ salary and a severance payment based on the Continuing Named Executives’ target EICP payment and, if applicable, a taxgross-up payment.percentage. In addition to these payments, the Continuing Named Executive would be entitled to various accrued benefits earned through the date of termination, such as earned but unpaid salary, earned but unused vacation and reimbursements.

Under these agreements, a “change in control” generally occurs on the occurrence of any of the following:

a person becomes the beneficial owner of 30% or more of the combined voting power of McDermott’s then outstanding voting stock unless such acquisition is made directly from McDermott in a transaction approved by a majority of McDermott’s incumbent directors;

individuals who are incumbent directors cease for any reason to constitute a majority of McDermott’s board;

completion of a merger or consolidation of McDermott with another company or an acquisition by McDermott or its subsidiaries, unless immediately following such merger, consolidation or acquisition: (1) all or substantially all of the individuals or entities that were the beneficial owners of outstanding McDermott voting securities immediately before such merger, consolidation or acquisition beneficially own at least 50% of the then outstanding shares of voting stock of the parent corporation resulting from the merger, consolidation or acquisition in the same relative proportions as their ownership immediately before such merger, consolidation or acquisition; (2) if such merger, consolidation or acquisition

involves the issuance or payment by McDermott of consideration to another entity or its stockholders, the total fair market value of such consideration plus the principal amount of the consolidated long-term debt of the entity or business being acquired, does not exceed 50% of the sum of the fair market value of the outstanding McDermott voting stock plus the principal amount of the Company’s consolidated long-term debt; (3) no person beneficially owns 30% or more of the then outstanding shares of the voting stock of the parent company resulting from such merger, consolidation or acquisition; and (4) a majority of the members of the board of directors of the parent corporation resulting from such merger, consolidation or acquisition were incumbent directors of McDermott immediately before such merger, consolidation or acquisition;

completion of the sale or disposition of 50% or more of the assets of McDermott and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis, unless immediately following such sale or disposition: (1) the individuals and entities that were beneficial owners of outstanding McDermott voting stock immediately before such sale or disposition beneficially own at least 50% of the then outstanding shares of voting stock of McDermott and of the entity that acquires the largest portion of such assets, and (2) a majority of the members of the McDermott Board (if it continues to exist) and the board of directors of the entity that acquires the largest portion of such assets were incumbent directors of McDermott immediately before the completion of such sale or disposition; or

any other set of circumstances is deemed by the Board in its sole discretion to constitute a change in control.

The change-in-control agreements do not provide for excise tax gross-ups. They do, however, provide for the potential reduction in payments to the applicable officer in order to avoid excise taxes.

 
Severance Payment.

The severance payment made to eachfollowing table shows the estimated value of payments and other benefits due the Continuing Named Executive, with the exception of Mr. Fees, in connection withExecutives assuming a change in control isand termination as of December 31, 2011.

   S.M. Johnson  P.L. Elders  G.L. Carlson  L.K. Hinrichs  J.T. McCormack 

Salary-Based Severance Payment(1)

 $5,658,882   $1,643,822   $1,070,466   $1,402,763   $1,549,098  

EICP-Based Severance Payment(2)

 $950,000   $339,500   $201,600   $264,000   $350,000  

Deferred Compensation Plan(3)

 $131,926   $32,597   $19,611   $21,020   $30,042  

Stock Options(4) (unvested and accelerated)

 $0   $0   $0   $0   $0  

Restricted Stock Units(4) (unvested and accelerated)

 $3,073,630   $408,881   $354,796   $953,454   $591,280  

Performance Shares(4) (unvested and accelerated)

 $650,649   $162,636   $65,055   $146,373   $205,384  

Total

 $10,465,087   $2,587,436   $1,711,528   $2,787,610   $2,725,804  

(1)The salary-based severance payment made to each Continuing Named Executive, with the exception of Mr. Johnson, in connection with a change in control would be a cash payment equal to 200% of the sum of his annual base salary prior to termination and his EICP target award applicable to the year in which the termination occurs. The severance payment made to Mr. Fees in connection with a change in control is a cash payment equal to 299% of the sum of his or her annual base salary prior to termination and his or her EICP target award applicable to the year in which the termination occurs. The severance payment made to Mr. Johnson in connection with a change in control would be a cash payment equal to 299% of the sum of his annual base salary prior to termination and his EICP target award applicable to the year in which the termination occurs.

For a hypothetical termination as of December 31, 2008,2011, the salary-based severance payment under achange-in-control change in control would have been calculated based on the following base salary and target EICP awards:

awards. See “Grants of Plan-Based Awards” above for more information on the calculation of target EICP awards.

  
  
Continuing Named Executive  Annual Base Salary   Target EICP Award 

S. M. Johnson

  $950,000    $942,603  

P. L. Elders

  $485,000    $336,911  

G. L. Carlson

  $336,000    $199,233  

L. K. Hinrichs

  $440,000    $261,381  

J. T. McCormack

  $500,000    $274,549  
  
  

(2)
• Mr. Fees: $750,000 base salary and $471,000 targetEach Continuing Named Executive could receive up to two EICP-based severance payments in connection with a change in control depending on the timing of the termination relative to the payment of an EICP (prorated between 100% of $750,000 and 70% of $540,000);
• Mr. Taff: $440,000 base salary and $242,000 target EICP (55% of his base salary);
• Mr. Bethards: $526,200 base salary and $276,360 target EICP (prorated between 70% of $526,200 and 60% of $409,500);
• Mr. Deason: $540,000 base salary and $378,000 target EICP (70% of his base salary); and
• Mr. Nesser: $500,000 base salary and $331,250 target EICP (prorated between 70% of $500,000 and 65% of $500,000).award, as follows:

If an EICP Payment.  The EICP is an annual cash-based performance incentive plan under which payments are made inaward for the year followingprior to termination is paid to other EICP participants after the date of the Continuing Named Executive’s termination, the Continuing Named Executive would be entitled to a cash payment equal to the product of the Continuing Named Executive’s target EICP percentage (or, if greater, the actual amount of the bonus determined under the EICP for the year prior to termination) and the Continuing Named Executive’s annual base salary for the applicable period. No such payment would have been due a Continuing Named Executive on a December 31, 2011 termination, because the 2010 EICP awards had already been paid prior to the Continuing Named Executive’s termination date.

The Continuing Named Executive would be entitled to a prorated EICP payment based upon the Continuing Named Executive’s target EICP percentage for the year in which performance is measured. For example, 2008the termination occurs and the number of days in which the Continuing Named Executive was employed with us during that year. Based on a hypothetical December 31, 2011 termination, each Continuing Named Executive would have been entitled to an EICP awards are paid in 2009 for performance achieved during 2008. As a result, dependingpayment equal to 100% of his or her 2011 target EICP percentage times annual base salary, calculated based on the timing of the termination relative to the payment of anfollowing base salary and target EICP award, a Named Executive could receive up to two EICP payments in connection with a change in control, as follows:percentage:

  
Continuing Named Executive  Annual
Base Salary
   Target EICP
Percentage
 

S. M. Johnson

  $950,000     100

P. L. Elders

  $485,000     70

G. L. Carlson

  $336,000     60

L. K. Hinrichs

  $440,000     60

J. T. McCormack

  $500,000     70
  
  

(3)
• If an EICP award for the year prior to termination is paid to other EICP participants after the dateThe amounts reported represent 80% of the Named Executive’s termination, the Named Executive would be entitled to a cash payment equal to the productMessrs. Johnson’s, Elders’, Carlson’s and McCormack’s and 15.62% of the Named Executive’s EICP target percentage and the Named Executive’s annual base salary for the applicable period. No such payment would have been due a Named Executive on aMs. Hinrichs’ respective Deferred Compensation Plan balance as of December 31, 20082011 that would become vested in connection with a termination because the 2007 EICP awards had already been paid prior to the Named Executive’s termination date.
• The Named Executive would be entitled to a prorated EICP payment based upon the Named Executive’s target award for the year in which the termination occurs and the number of days in which the executive was employed with us during that year. Based on a hypothetical December 31, 2008 termination, each Named Executive would have been entitled to an EICP payment equal to 100% of his 2008 target EICP. See the schedule of target EICP amounts for each Named Executive in “Severance Payment” above.
TaxGross-Up.  If any payment is subject to the excise tax imposed by section 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, we would reimburse the affected Named Executive for all excise taxes imposed under section 4999 and any income and excise taxes that are payable as a result of such reimbursement. The calculation of thesection 4999 gross-up amount in the above tables is based upon a section 4999 excise tax rate of 20%, a 35% federal income tax rate, a 1.45% Medicare tax rate and a state income tax rate of 5.75% for Mr. Fees and 6.24% for Mr. Bethards. Based on the amounts reported in the “Change in Control” column, Messrs. Fees, Bethards, Deason and Nesser would not have an excise tax liability.


51


Definition of “Change in Control.”  Under these agreements, a “change in control” occurs if:
• a person (other than a McDermott employee benefit plan or a corporation owned by McDermott stockholders in substantially the same proportion as their ownership of McDermott voting shares) becomes the beneficial owner of 30% or more of the combined voting power of McDermott’s then outstanding voting stock;
• during any period of two consecutive years, individuals who at the beginning of such period constitute McDermott’s Board of Directors, and any new director whose election or nomination by McDermott’s Board was approved by at least two-thirds of the directors of McDermott’s Board, then still in office who either were directors at the beginning of the period or whose election or nomination was previously approved, cease to constitute a majority of McDermott’s Board;
• McDermott’s stockholders approve: (1) a merger or consolidation of McDermott with another company, other than a merger or consolidation which would result in McDermott’s voting securities outstanding immediately prior thereto continuing to represent at least 50% of the voting stock of McDermott or such surviving entity outstanding immediately after such merger or consolidation; (2) a plan of complete liquidation of McDermott; or (3) an agreement for the sale or disposition by McDermott of all or substantially all of McDermott’s assets; or
• any other circumstances as may be deemed by the Board in its sole discretion to constituteemployment following a change in control. Under the Deferred Compensation Plan, a “change in control” generally occurs if:

For

a discussionperson (other than a McDermott employee benefit plan or a corporation owned by McDermott stockholders in substantially the same proportion as the ownership of additional amounts payable to a Named Executive, seeMcDermott voting shares) is or becomes the “Stock Options, Restricted Stock, Deferred Stock Units and Performance Shares” and “SERP” sections below.

Stock Options, Restricted Stock, Deferred Stock Units and Performance Shares.  Under the termsbeneficial owner of 30% or more of the awardscombined voting power of McDermott’s then outstanding voting stock;

during any period of two consecutive years, individuals who at the beginning of such period constitute McDermott’s Board of Directors, and any new director whose election or nomination by McDermott’s Board was approved by at least two-thirds of the directors of McDermott’s Board then still in office who either were directors at the beginning of the period or whose election or nomination was previously approved, cease to constitute a majority of McDermott’s Board;

a merger or consolidation of McDermott, with any other corporation or entity has been completed, other than a merger or consolidation which results in the outstanding McDermott voting securities immediately prior to such merger or consolidation continuing to represent at least 50% of the combined voting power of the voting securities of McDermott or the surviving entity outstanding immediately after such merger or consolidation;

McDermott’s stockholders approve (1) a plan of complete liquidation of McDermott; or (2) an agreement for each Named Executive asthe sale or disposition by McDermott of December 31, 2008, all unvested stock options, restricted stockor substantially all of McDermott’s assets; or

within one year following the completion of a merger or consolidation transaction involving McDermott, (1) individuals who, at the time of execution and deferred stock units become vested on normal retirement,delivery of definitive agreements completing such transaction constituted the Board, cease for any reason (excluding death, disability or voluntary resignation) to constitute a majority of the Board; or (2) either individual, who at the first execution and without regarddelivery of definitive agreements completing the transaction, served as Chief Executive Officer or Chief Financial Officer does not, for any reason (excluding death, disability or voluntary resignation), serve as the Chief Executive Officer or Chief Financial Officer, as applicable, of McDermott, or if McDermott does not continue as a registrant with a class of equity securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as the Chief Executive Officer or Chief Financial Officer, as applicable, of a corporation or other entity that is (A) a registrant with a class of equity securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (B) the surviving entity in such transaction or a parent entity of the surviving entity or McDermott following the completion of such transaction; provided, however, that a Change in Control would not be deemed to have occurred pursuant to this clause in the case of a merger or consolidation which results in the voting securities of McDermott outstanding immediately prior to the lack of any subsequent termination, a change in control.

Performance shares are subject to accelerated vesting on a change in control, without regard to the lack of any subsequent termination. Otherwise, performance shares vest in accordance with the original vesting schedule on death and disability and may vest at a percentagecompletion of the original vesting schedule intransaction continuing to represent (either by remaining outstanding or by being converted into voting securities of the eventsurviving entity) at least 55% of termination due to retirementthe combined voting power of the voting securities of the McDermott or a reduction in force.
Valuation of Unvested and Accelerated Equity.  The amounts reported in the above tables for stock options, restricted stock, deferred stock units and performance shares represent the value of unvested and accelerated sharessurviving entity outstanding immediately after such merger or units, as applicable, calculated by:consolidation.

(4)
• forUnder the terms of the stock options: multiplying the numberoption and restricted stock unit awards outstanding, all unvested stock options would become vested and exercisable and all unvested restricted stock units would become vested on a change in control, regardless of accelerated options by the difference betweenwhether there is a subsequent termination of employment. Due to the exercise price of the stock options outstanding for our Continuing Named Executives and the closing price of our common stock on December 31, 2008,30, 2011, the aggregate value of stock options that would become vested and exercisable on a change in control, regardless of whether there is a subsequent termination of employment, would be $0. Under the terms of the performance share awards outstanding, the greater of (1) 100% of the initial performance shares granted, or (2) the vested percentage of initial performance shares determined in accordance with the grant agreement would become vested on a change in control, regardless of whether there is a subsequent termination of employment. Under our 2001 D&O Plan and 2009 LTIP, a “change in control” generally occurs under the same circumstances described above with respect to our Deferred Compensation Plan, except that the 2001 D&O Plan and the 2009 LTIP do not include, as reporteda change in control event, the event described in the last bullet in note (3) above.

ADVISORY VOTETO APPROVE NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION

(ITEM 2)

As required by Section 14A(a)(1) of the Exchange Act, we are providing our stockholders with an advisory vote to approve named executive officer compensation.

The Compensation Committee has overall responsibility for our compensation plans, policies and programs with respect to the Named Executives. Additional information regarding the Compensation Committee and its role is described under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” and the related tables and narrative disclosures. Our compensation programs are based on our belief that our ability to attract, retain and motivate qualified employees to develop, expand and execute sound business opportunities is essential to the success of our company. To that end, the Compensation Committee, with the assistance of its compensation consultant, designs and administers compensation programs with the participation of our management. These programs generally seek to provide compensation that:

incentivizes and rewards short- and long-term performance, continuity of service and individual contributions; and

promotes retention of well-qualified executives, while aligning the interests of our executives with those of our stockholders.

We believe our compensation programs motivate and retain the Continuing Named Executives, while allowing for appropriate levels of business risk through some of the following features:

Reasonable Compensation Programs — Using the elements of total direct compensation, the Compensation Committee seeks to provide compensation opportunities for employees targeted at or near the median compensation of comparable positions in our market. As a result, we believe the total direct compensation of executive officer employees provides a reasonable and appropriate mix of cash and equity, annual and longer-term incentives, and performance metrics.

Emphasize Long-Term Incentive Over Annual Incentive Compensation — Long-term incentive compensation typically makes up a larger percentage of an executive officer employee’s total direct compen-

sation than annual incentive compensation. Incentive compensation helps drive performance and align the interests of those employees with those of stockholders. In addition, tying a significant portion of an employee’s total direct compensation to long-term incentives (which typically vest over a period of three or more years) helps to promote longer-term perspectives regarding our company’s performance.

Clawback Policy — The Compensation Committee has adopted a policy under which McDermott shall seek to recover any incentive-based award granted to any executive officer as required by the provisions of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act or any other “clawback” provision required by law or the listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange ($9.88);Exchange.

 for restricted stock and performance units: multiplying the number of accelerated shares by the closing price of our common stock on December 31, 2008, as reported on the New York Stock Exchange ($9.88); and
 

Long-Term Incentive Compensation Subject to Forfeiture — The Compensation Committee may terminate any outstanding stock award if the recipient, while employed by McDermott or performing services on behalf of McDermott under any consulting agreement: (1) is convicted of a misdemeanor involving fraud, dishonesty or moral turpitude or a felony; or (2) engages in conduct that adversely affects or, in the sole judgment of the Compensation Committee, may reasonably be expected to adversely affect, our business reputation or economic interests.

 

Linear and Capped Incentive Compensation Payouts — The Compensation Committee establishes financial performance goals which are used to plot a linear payout formula for deferred stock units (which representannual incentive compensation, eliminating payout “cliffs” between the established performance goals. The maximum payout for the annual incentive compensation is capped at 200% of target.

Use of Multiple and Appropriate Performance Metrics — Utilizing diversified performance measures helps prevent compensation opportunities from being overly weighted toward the performance

result of a rightsingle measure. In general, our incentive programs are historically based on a mix of financial and individual goals. In recent years our primary financial performance metric has been operating income. Compared to receiveother financial metrics, operating income is a cash payment equal to the productmeasure of the number of vested units and the average of the highest and lowest sales priceprofitability of our common stockbusiness which helps drive accountability at our operating segments thereby reducing risks related to incentive compensation by putting the focus on quality of revenues not quantity. Additionally, commencing in 2011, the vesting date): multiplyingCompensation Committee utilized total shareholder return and return on invested capital as additional performance measures.

Stock Ownership Guidelines — Our executive officers and directors are subject to share ownership guidelines which also helps promote longer-term perspectives and align the number of accelerated units by the average price of the highest and lowest priceinterests of our commonexecutive officers and directors with those of our stockholders. In 2010, we increased the stock on December 31, 2008, as reported on the New York Stock Exchange ($9.79).ownership requirements for both our executive officers and nonemployee directors to further emphasize this alignment of interests.

Reflecting these compensation objectives, compensation arrangements in 2011 for our Continuing Named Executives resulted in:

Definition

target total direct compensation within approximately 15% of “Changethe median compensation for officers in Control.”  Undercomparable positions in our 2001 D&O Plan, a “change in control” occurs undermarket, with the same circumstances describedexception of Mr. Johnson, whose target total direct compensation was set slightly above with respectmarket due to our change in control agreements.

SERP.  The amounts reported inhis demonstrated leadership following the above tables representSpin-off;

performance-based compensation accounting for over 60% of Mr. Taff’s SERP balancetarget total direct compensation, on average, as compared to 46% in 2010; and

performance-based compensation, accounting for 75% of target long-term incentive compensation, as compared to 50% in 2010.

McDermott’s financial performance in 2011 included:

Consolidated revenue of $3.4 billion, as compared to $2.4 billion for 2010;

Consolidated operating income of $250.7 million, as compared to $314.9 million for 2010; and

Consolidated ROIC of 8%.

Operationally, in 2011 McDermott also:

Achieved backlog of $3.88 billion as of December 31, 20082011;

Achieved substantial growth in our Asia Pacific segment, as reflected by increases of over 115% in both revenue and 40%operating income in the segment as compared to 2010;

Amended/refinanced our credit facility to extend the scheduled maturity date, provide additional liquidity, obtain improved covenants and reduce fees; and

Established a joint venture entity which we co-own with two Brazilian companies, which joint venture plans to bid to provide engineering, procurement and construction (“EPC”) services to the oil and gas industry offshore Brazil.

Under McDermott’s 2011 compensation program,

None of the Continuing Named Executives were awarded bonuses under the 2011 EICP. Based on McDermott’s 2011 financial results, the Continuing Named Executives were eligible to earn approximately 18% of their respective 2011 target EICP compensation, subject to the assessment of their respective individual goals. Upon the recommendation of Mr. Johnson based on the 2011 financial results, the Compensation Committee, in the exercise of its discretion, determined that, although the Continuing Named Executives and other participants in the EICP were eligible to earn approximately 18% of their target EICP compensation, 0% would be awarded in light of the financial results. Instead, as recommended by Mr. Johnson, the Compensation Committee determined that the bonus amounts that otherwise would have been payable should effectively be returned to the shareholders in the form of additional operating income. In making this recommendation and decision, respectively, Mr. Johnson and the Compensation Committee considered the increase in 2011

revenues of approximately 43%, together with the decrease in 2011 operating income by approximately 20% from 2010 levels, the continued performance issues in the Atlantic segment and issues relating to several projects in other segments.

In making its decision not to award bonuses for 2011 under the EICP, the Compensation Committee noted that Mr. Johnson had achieved the individual performance component, based on the Governance Committee’s assessment of Mr. Johnson’s individual performance against stated goals, and each of Messrs. Elders, Carlson and McCormack and Ms. Hinrichs had achieved their respective

individual performance components based on Mr. Johnson’s assessment of their respective individual performance achievements against stated goals, with the exception of the financial performance goal and a safety goal for Mr. McCormack.

As of December 31, 2011, (1) the estimated payout as a percent of target for the performance shares granted in 2011 was 0%, and (2) the share price of our common stock had not exceeded the strike price of the stock options granted in 2011, although as noted below, the estimated payout and share price may change during the term of the performance shares and stock options.

The following table summarizes the 2011 performance-based compensation opportunities for each of our Continuing Named Executives’ SERP balancesExecutives as compared to the realizable value of such opportunities as of December 31, 20082011:

2011 Performance-Based Compensation Opportunity vs. Realizable Value as of December 31, 2011

    EICP(1)   Performance
Shares(2)(3)
   Stock
Options(2)(3)
   Total 

S. M. Johnson

        

2011 Opportunity

  $942,603    $2,382,132    $944,089    $4,268,824  

2011 Realizable Value

  $0    $0    $0    $0  

P. L. Elders

        

2011 Opportunity

  $336,911    $595,438    $236,000    $1,168,349  

2011 Realizable Value

  $0    $0    $0    $0  

G. L. Carlson

        

2011 Opportunity

  $199,233    $238,175    $94,406    $531,814  

2011 Realizable Value

  $0    $0    $0    $0  

L. K. Hinrichs

        

2011 Opportunity

  $261,381    $535,894    $212,421    $1,009,696  

2011 Realizable Value

  $0    $0    $0    $0  

J. T. McCormack

        

2011 Opportunity

  $274,549    $634,020    $253,847    $1,162,416  

2011 Realizable Value

  $0    $0    $0    $0  

(1)2011 Opportunity Values for EICP are disclosed at the Continuing Named Executives’ target EICP award. The 2011 Opportunity Value provided for Mr. McCormack reflects his target EICP award following his promotion to EVP, COO.

(2)2011 Opportunity Values for performance shares and stock options are disclosed at the grant date fair value of the respective awards.

(3)The 2011 Realizable Values shown above are measured as of December 31, 2011. However, the amount of the performance shares granted in 2011 that ultimately vest, if any, will be determined by reference to our total shareholder return over three-, four- and five-year periods. See “Long-Term Incentive Compensation — Analysis of 2011 Equity Grants.” The vesting of any of these performance shares would impact the future Realizable Value of these performance share awards. In addition, an increase in our stock price compared to our stock price at December 31, 2011 may impact the future Realizable Value of the stock option awards granted in 2011.

For the reasons discussed above, the Board of Directors unanimously recommends that become vested understockholders vote FOR the various scenarios. Mr. Taff became 60% vested on January 1, 2009 andfollowing resolution:

“RESOLVED, that the other Named Executives became 80% vested on January 1, 2009. With respect to a change in control, the amount shown would be


52


duecompensation paid to the Named Executive if heExecutives, as disclosed pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, compensation tables and

accompanying narrative discussion in McDermott’s proxy statement relating to its 2012 annual meeting of stockholders is terminated without cause within one year after a change in control. Seehereby APPROVED.”

While the “Nonqualified Deferred Compensation” table above for more information regardingresolution is non-binding, the SERP.Board of Directors plans to consider the outcome of the vote when making future compensation decisions.

 
Definition of “Change in Control.”  Under the SERP, a “change in control” occurs under the same circumstances described above with respect to our change in control agreements.
Definition of “Cause.”  Under the SERP, termination for “cause” means:
• the overt and willful disobedience of orders or directives issued to a person who participates in the SERP (a “Participant”) that are within the scope of his duties, or any other willful and continued failure of a Participant to perform substantially his duties with McDermott (occasioned by reason other than physical or mental illness or disability) after a written demand for substantial performance is delivered to the Participant by the Compensation Committee or the Chief Executive Officer of McDermott which specifically identifies the manner in which the Compensation Committee or Chief Executive Officer believes that the Participant has not substantially performed his or her duties, after which the Participant shall have 30 days to defend or remedy such failure to substantially perform his or her duties;
• the willful engaging by the Participant in illegal conduct or gross misconduct which is materially and demonstrably injurious to McDermott; or
• the conviction of the Participant with no further possibility of appeal, or plea ofnolo contendereby the Participant to, any felony or crime of falsehood.


53


AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
The following table sets forth the number of shares of our common stock beneficially owned as of March 2, 2009 by each director or nominee as a director, and each Named Executive and all our directors and executive officers as a group, including shares that those persons have the right to acquire within 60 days on the exercise of stock options.
Shares
Beneficially
Name
Owned
Brandon C. Bethards(1)
36,190
John F. Bookout III(2)
20,986
Roger A. Brown(3)
40,166
Ronald C. Cambre(4)
23,630
Robert A. Deason(5)
109,021
John A. Fees(6)
150,261
Robert W. Goldman(7)
15,536
Robert L. Howard(8)
141,589
Oliver D. Kingsley, Jr.(9)
34,616
D. Bradley McWilliams(10)
54,506
Adm. Richard W. Mies1,782
John T. Nesser, III(11)
346,623
Thomas C. Schievelbein(12)
51,831
Michael S. Taff(13)
33,072
Bruce W. Wilkinson(14)
666,991
All directors and executive officers as a group (20 persons)(15)
1,804,799
(1)Shares owned by Mr. Bethards include 29,930 restricted shares of common stock as to which he has sole voting power but no dispositive power and 140 shares of common stock held in the McDermott Thrift Plan.
(2)Shares owned by Mr. Bookout include 3,150 shares of common stock that he may acquire on the exercise of stock options, as described above, and 1,350 restricted shares of common stock as to which he has sole voting power but no dispositive power.
(3)Shares owned by Mr. Brown include 19,650 shares of common stock that he may acquire on the exercise of stock options, as described above.
(4)Shares owned by Mr. Cambre include 1,350 restricted shares of common stock as to which he has sole voting power but no dispositive power.
(5)Shares owned by Mr. Deason include 30,540 shares of common stock that he may acquire on the exercise of stock options, as described above, 7,620 restricted shares of common stock as to which he has sole voting power but no dispositive power and 271 shares of common stock held in the McDermott Thrift Plan.
(6)Shares owned by Mr. Fees include 49,320 restricted shares of common stock as to which he has sole voting power but no dispositive power and 17,347 shares of common stock held in the McDermott Thrift Plan.
(7)Shares owned by Mr. Goldman include 4,950 shares of common stock that he may acquire on the exercise of stock options, as described above, and 1,350 restricted shares of common stock as to which he has sole voting power but no dispositive power.
(8)Shares owned by Mr. Howard include 84,900 shares of common stock that he may acquire on the exercise of stock options, as described above, and 1,800 restricted shares of common stock as to which he has sole voting power but no dispositive power.
(9)Shares owned by Mr. Kingsley include 19,950 shares of common stock that he may acquire on the exercise of stock options, as described above.


54


(10)Shares owned by Mr. McWilliams include 37,876 shares of common stock that he may acquire on the exercise of stock options, as described above, and 1,800 restricted shares of common stock as to which he has sole voting power but no dispositive power.
(11)Shares owned by Mr. Nesser include 13,010 restricted shares of common stock as to which he has sole voting power but no dispositive power and 13,992 shares of common stock held in the McDermott Thrift Plan.
(12)Shares owned by Mr. Schievelbein include 37,426 shares of common stock that he may acquire on the exercise of stock options, as described above, and 1,800 restricted shares of common stock as to which he has sole voting power but no dispositive power.
(13)Shares owned by Mr. Taff include 23,000 shares of common stock that he may acquire on the exercise of stock options, as described above, 6,890 restricted shares of common stock as to which he has sole voting power but no dispositive power and 1,182 shares of common stock held in the McDermott Thrift Plan.
(14)Shares owned by Mr. Wilkinson include 10,333 shares of common stock held in the McDermott Thrift Plan.
(15)Shares owned by all directors and executive officers as a group include 287,842 shares of common stock that may be acquired on the exercise of stock options, as described above, 140,690 restricted shares of common stock as to which they have sole voting power but no dispositive power, and 49,055 shares of common stock held in the McDermott Thrift Plan.
Shares beneficially owned in all cases constituted less than one percent of the outstanding shares of common stock on March 2, 2009, as determined in accordance withRule 13d-3(d)(1) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS
The following table furnishes information concerning all persons known by us to beneficially own 5% or more of our outstanding shares of common stock, which is our only class of voting stock outstanding:
           
    Amount and
  
    Nature of
  
    Beneficial
 Percent of
Title of Class
 Name and Address of Beneficial Owner Ownership Class(1)
 
Common Stock ClearBridge Advisors, LLC  15,707,341(2)  6.89%
  620 8th Avenue
New York, NY 10018
        
Common Stock PRIMECAP Management Company  11,658,622(3)  5.10%
  225 South Lake Ave., #400
Pasadena, CA 91101
        
(1)Percent is based on outstanding shares of our common stock on March 2, 2009.
(2)As reported on Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 13, 2009. The Schedule 13G reports beneficial ownership of 15,707,341 shares of our common stock, sole voting power over 14,462,170 shares and sole dispositive power over 15,707,341 shares.
(3)As reported on Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 12, 2009. The Schedule 13G/A reports beneficial ownership of 11,658,622 shares of our common stock, sole voting power over 6,867,622 shares and sole dispositive power over 11,658,622 shares.


55


AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT
The Board of Directors appoints an Audit Committee to review McDermott International, Inc.’s financial matters. Each member of the Audit Committee meets the independence requirements established by the New York Stock Exchange. The Audit Committee is responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of McDermott’s independent registered public accounting firm. We are also responsible for recommending to the Board that McDermott’s audited financial statements be included in its Annual Report onForm 10-K for the fiscal year.

In making our recommendation that McDermott’s financial statements be included in its Annual Report onForm 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008,2011, we have taken the following steps:

We discussed with Deloitte & Touche LLP (“D&T”), McDermott’s independent registered public accounting firm for the year ended December 31, 2011, those matters required to be discussed by Statements on Auditing Standards No. 61, as amended, issued by the Auditing Standards Board of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, including information regarding the scope and results of the audit. These communications and discussions are intended to assist us in overseeing the financial reporting and disclosure process.

We conducted periodic executive sessions with D&T, with no members of McDermott management present during those discussions. D&T did not identify any material audit issues, questions or discrepancies, other than those previously discussed with management, which were resolved to the satisfaction of all parties.

• We discussed with Deloitte & Touche LLP (“D&T”), McDermott’s independent registered public accounting firm for the year ended December 31, 2008, those matters required to be discussed by Statements on Auditing Standards Nos. 61 and 90, each as amended, issued by the Auditing Standards Board of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, including information regarding the scope and results of the audit. These communications and discussions are intended to assist us in overseeing the financial reporting and disclosure process.
• We conducted periodic executive sessions with D&T, with no members of McDermott management present during those discussions. D&T did not identify any material audit issues, questions or discrepancies, other than those previously discussed with management, which were resolved to the satisfaction of all parties.
• We conducted periodic executive sessions with McDermott’s internal audit department and regularly received reports regarding McDermott’s internal control procedures.
• We reviewed, and discussed with McDermott’s management and D&T, management’s report and D&T’s report and attestation on internal control over financial reporting, each of which was prepared in accordance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
• We received and reviewed the written disclosures and the letter from D&T required by applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding D&T’s communications with the audit committee concerning D&T’s independence from McDermott, and have discussed with D&T their independence from McDermott. We also considered whether the provision of nonaudit services to McDermott is compatible with D&T’s independence.
• We determined that there were no former D&T employees, who previously participated in the McDermott audit, engaged in a financial reporting oversight role at McDermott.
• We reviewed, and discussed with McDermott’s management and D&T, McDermott’s audited consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2008, and consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, cash flows, and stockholders’ equity for the year ended December 31, 2008.

We conducted periodic executive sessions with McDermott’s internal audit department and regularly received reports regarding McDermott’s internal control procedures.

We reviewed, and discussed with McDermott’s management and D&T, management’s report and D&T’s report and attestation on internal control over financial reporting, each of which was prepared in accordance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.

We received and reviewed the written disclosures and the letter from D&T required by applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding D&T’s communications with the audit committee concerning D&T’s independence from McDermott, and have discussed with D&T its independence from McDermott. We also considered whether the provision of non-audit services to McDermott is compatible with D&T’s independence.

We determined that there were no former D&T employees, who previously participated in the McDermott audit, engaged in a financial reporting oversight role at McDermott.

We reviewed, and discussed with McDermott’s management and D&T, McDermott’s audited consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2011, and consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, cash flows and stockholders’ equity for the year ended December 31, 2011.

Based on the reviews and actions described above, we recommended to the Board that McDermott’s audited financial statements be included in its Annual Report onForm 10-K for the year ended December 31, 20082011 for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

THE AUDIT COMMITTEE

David A. Trice, Chairman

Stephen G. Hanks

D. Bradley McWilliams Chairman

John F. Bookout, III
Robert W. Goldman
Richard W. Mies


56


RATIFICATIONOF APPOINTMENTOF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMFOR YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2012

(ITEM 3)

APPROVAL OF THE 2009 McDERMOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC.
LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN
(ITEM 2)
We are asking our stockholders to approve the 2009 McDermott International, Inc. Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “2009 LTI Plan”). Our current equity incentive plan, the McDermott International, Inc. 2001 Directors & Officers Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “2001 D&O Plan”), will expire in 2011. If our stockholders approve the 2009 LTI Plan, the shares that would be available for issuance under the 2001 D&O Plan would become available for issuance under the 2009 LTI Plan. Accordingly, we do not anticipate making any new awards under the 2001 D&O Plan following stockholder approval of the 2009 LTI Plan.
On February 27, 2009, our Board of Directors adopted, subject to stockholder approval, the 2009 LTI Plan. If approved by stockholders, 9,000,000 shares, plus the shares that would have been available for issuance under the 2001 D&O Plan, will be reserved for issuance under the 2009 LTI Plan.
We believe strongly that the approval of the 2009 LTI Plan is important to our ability to recruit and retain executive officers, directors and key employees with outstanding ability and experience essential to our long-term growth and financial success. We also believe that utilization of the 2009 LTI Plan will promote the alignment of the interests of 2009 LTI Plan participants with those of our stockholders and provide Plan participants with further incentives for outstanding performance.
A summary of the 2009 LTI Plan is set forth below. This summary is, however, qualified in its entirety to the text of the 2009 LTI Plan, which is attached as Appendix A to this proxy statement.
SUMMARY DESCRIPTION OF THE 2009 LTI PLAN
Administration.  The 2009 LTI Plan will be administered by the Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors. The Compensation Committee will select the participants and determine the type or types of awards and the number of shares or units to be optioned or granted to each participant under the 2009 LTI Plan. All or part of the award may be subject to conditions established by the Compensation Committee, which may include continued service with our company, achievement of specific business objectives, increases in specified indices, attainment of specified growth rates or other comparable measures of performance. The Compensation Committee will have full and final authority to implement the 2009 LTI Plan and may, from time to time, adopt rules and regulations in order to carry out the terms of the 2009 LTI Plan. As permitted by law, the Compensation Committee may generally delegate its duties under the 2009 LTI Plan to our chief executive officer and other senior officers.
Eligibility.  Members of the Board of Directors, executive officers and employees of our company and its subsidiaries, as well as consultants, are eligible to participate in the 2009 LTI Plan. The Compensation Committee will select the participants for the 2009 LTI Plan. Any participant may receive more than one award under the 2009 LTI Plan. Presently, 228 current and former employees and 10 current and former members of the Board of Directors participate in the 2001 D&O Plan. Because the 2009 LTI Plan provides for broad discretion in selecting participants and in making awards, however, the total number of persons who will participate going forward and the respective benefits to be awarded to them cannot be determined at this time.
Shares Available for Issuance through the 2009 LTI Plan.  Shares approved under the 2001 D&O Plan which have not been awarded as of the date the 2009 LTI Plan is approved by stockholders, or are subject to awards that are cancelled, terminated, forfeited, expired or settled in cash in lieu of shares, will become available for issuance under the 2009 LTI Plan. As of March 6, 2009, 3,222,073 shares remained available for issuance under the 2001 D&O Plan. By this proposal, we are asking stockholders for authorization to reserve an additional 9,000,000 shares for issuance under the 2009 LTI Plan. No awards will be made under the 2009 LTI Plan until stockholders have approved the 2009 LTI Plan.
The 2009 LTI Plan provides for a number of forms of stock-based compensation, as further described below. The 2009 LTI Plan also permits the reuse or reissuance by the 2009 LTI Plan of shares of common stock underlying canceled, expired, terminated or forfeited awards of stock-based compensation granted under the 2009 LTI Plan.
The Compensation Committee shall make appropriate adjustments in the number and kind of shares that may be issued, the number and kind of shares subject to outstanding awards, the exercise or other applicable price and other value determinations applicable to outstanding awards under the 2009 LTI Plan to reflect any amendment to


57


the 2009 LTI Plan, stock split, stock dividend, recapitalization, merger, consolidation, reorganization, combination or exchange of shares or other similar event.
Types of Awards Under the 2009 LTI Plan.  The Compensation Committee may award to participants incentive and nonqualified stock options, restricted stock, restricted stock units and performance shares and performance units. The forms of awards are described in greater detail below.
Stock Options.  The Compensation Committee will have discretion to award incentive stock options and nonqualified stock options. A stock option is a right to purchase a specified number of shares of common stock at a specified grant price. An incentive stock option is intended to qualify as such under Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code (which we refer to as the “Code”). Under the 2009 LTI Plan, no participant may be granted options during any fiscal year that are exercisable for more than 1,200,000 shares of our common stock. The exercise price of an option may not be less than the fair market value of the underlying shares of common stock on the date of grant. Subject to the specific terms of the 2009 LTI Plan, the Compensation Committee will have discretion to determine the number of shares, the exercise price, the terms and conditions of exercise, whether an option will qualify as an incentive stock option under the Code and set such additional limitations on and terms of option grants as it deems appropriate.
Options granted to participants under the 2009 LTI Plan will expire at such times as the Compensation Committee determines at the time of the grant, but no option will be exercisable later than seven years from the date of grant. Each option award agreement will set forth the extent to which the participant will have the right to exercise the option following termination of the participant’s employment. The termination provisions will be determined within the discretion of the Compensation Committee, may not be uniform among all participants and may reflect distinctions based on the reasons for termination of employment. Dividend equivalents do not attach to stock options.
Upon the exercise of an option granted under the 2009 LTI Plan, the option price is payable in full to us (1) in cash; (2) if permitted in the award agreement, by tendering shares having a fair market value at the time of exercise equal to the total option price (provided such shares have been held for at least six months prior to their tender); (3) if permitted in the award agreement, by a combination of (1) and (2); or (4) by any other method approved by the Compensation Committee in its sole discretion at the time of the grant and as set forth in the related award agreement.
Restricted Stock.  The Compensation Committee also will be authorized to award restricted shares of common stock under the 2009 LTI Plan on such terms and conditions as it shall establish. Although recipients will have the right to vote restricted shares from the date of grant, they will not have the right to sell or otherwise transfer the shares during the applicable period of restriction or until earlier satisfaction of other conditions imposed by the Compensation Committee in its sole discretion. The award agreement will specify the periods of restriction, restrictions based on achievement of specific performance objectives, restrictions under applicable federal or state securities laws and such other terms it deems appropriate. Unless the Compensation Committee otherwise determines, participants will receive dividends on their shares of restricted stock. The Compensation Committee in its discretion may apply any restrictions to the dividends that it deems appropriate.
Each award agreement for restricted stock will set forth the extent to which the participant will have the right to retain unvested shares of restricted stock following termination of the participant’s employment. These provisions will be determined in the sole discretion of the Compensation Committee, need not be uniform among all shares of restricted stock issued pursuant to the 2009 LTI Plan and may reflect distinctions based on reasons for termination of employment.
Restricted Stock Units.  An award of a restricted stock unit constitutes an agreement by us to deliver shares of our common stock or to pay an amount equal to the fair market value of a share of common stock for each restricted stock unit to a participant in the future in consideration of the performance of services. Restricted stock units may be granted by the Compensation Committee on such terms and conditions as it may establish. The restricted stock unit award agreement will specify the vesting period or periods, the specific performance objectives and such other conditions as may apply to the award. During the applicable vesting period, participants will have no voting rights with respect to the shares of common stock underlying a restricted stock unit grant. However, participants shall, unless the Compensation Committee otherwise determines, receive dividend equivalents on the shares underlying


58


their restricted stock unit grant in the form of cash or additional restricted stock units if a dividend is paid with respect to shares of our common stock.
Each award agreement for restricted stock units will set forth the extent to which the participant will have the right to retain unvested restricted stock units following termination of employment. These provisions will be determined in the sole discretion of the Compensation Committee, need not be uniform among all participants and may reflect distinctions based on reasons for termination of employment.
No more than 1,200,000 shares of common stock may be granted in the form of awards of restricted stock and restricted stock units to any participant in any fiscal year.
Performance Shares and Performance Units.  Performance units and performance shares are forms of performance awards that are subject to the attainment of one or more pre-established performance goals during a designated performance period. Performance units and performance shares may be granted by the Compensation Committee at any time in such amounts and on such terms as the Compensation Committee determines. Each performance unit will have an initial value that is established by the Compensation Committee at the time of grant. Each performance share will have an initial value equal to the fair market value of a share of our common stock on the date of grant. The Compensation Committee in its discretion will determine the applicable performance period and will establish performance goals for any given performance period. When the performance period expires, the holder of performance shares or performance units will be entitled to receive a payout on the unitsand/or shares earned over the performance period based on the extent to which the performance goals have been achieved. Participants holding performance sharesand/or performance units are not entitled to receive dividend units for dividends declared with respect to shares of our common stock.
Payments may be made in cash or in shares of common stock that have an aggregate fair market value equal to the earned performance units or performance shares on the last day of the applicable performance period. Each award agreement will set forth the extent to which the participant will have the right to receive a payout of these performance sharesand/or performance units following termination of the participant’s employment. The termination provisions will be determined by the Compensation Committee in its sole discretion, may not be uniform among all participants and may reflect distinctions based on the reasons for termination of employment.
No more than 1,200,000 shares of common stock may be granted in the form of awards of performance shares to any participant in any fiscal year. No more than $6,000,000 may be paid in cash to any participant with respect to performance units granted in any fiscal year, as valued on the date of each grant.
Performance Measures.  The Compensation Committee may grant awards under the 2009 LTI Plan to eligible employees subject to the attainment of specified performance measures. The number of performance-based awards granted to an officer or employee in any year will be determined by the Compensation Committee in its sole discretion, subject to the limitations set forth in the 2009 LTI Plan. The value of each performance-based award will be determined based on the achievement of the pre-established, objective performance goals during each performance period. The duration of a performance period is set by the Compensation Committee. A new performance period may begin every year, or at more frequent or less frequent intervals, as determined by the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee will establish, in writing, the objective performance goals applicable to the valuation of performance-based awards granted in each performance period, the performance measures that will be used to determine the achievement of those performance goals and any formulas or methods to be used to determine the value of the performance-based awards.
Performance measures will be defined by the Compensation Committee on a consolidated, group or division basisand/or in comparison to one or more peer groups or indices. Performance measures selected by the Compensation Committee will be one or more of the following: cash flow, cash flow return on capital, cash flow return on assets, cash flow return on equity, net income, return on capital, return on assets, return on equity, share price, earnings per share, earnings before interest and taxes, earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, total return to stockholders, operating income and return on net assets. Following the end of a performance period, the Compensation Committee will determine the value of the performance-based awards granted for the period based on its determination of the degree of attainment of the pre-established objective


59


performance goals. The Compensation Committee will also have discretion to reduce (but not to increase) the value of a performance-based award to “Covered Employees,” as defined in Section 162(m) of the Code.
Deferrals.  The Compensation Committee will have the discretion to provide for the deferral of an award or to permit participants to elect to defer payment of some or all types of awards in a manner consistent with the requirements of Section 409A of the Code.
Change in Control.  The treatment of outstanding awards upon the occurrence of a change in control (as defined in the 2009 LTI Plan) will be determined in the sole discretion of the Compensation Committee and will be described in the applicable award agreements and need not be uniform among all awards granted under the 2009 LTI Plan.
Adjustment and Amendments.  The 2009 LTI Plan provides for appropriate adjustments in the number of shares of our common stock subject to awards and available for future awards, as well as the maximum award limitations under the 2009 LTI Plan, in the event of changes in our outstanding common stock by reason of a merger, stock split, or certain other events. The 2009 LTI Plan may be modified, altered, suspended or terminated by the Board of Directors at any time and for any purpose that the Board of Directors deems appropriate, but no amendment to the 2009 LTI Plan shall adversely affect any outstanding awards without the affected participant’s consent, and stockholder approval is required if an amendment will materially modify the 2009 LTI Plan or is otherwise required by applicable law.
Transferability.  Except as otherwise specified in a participant’s award agreement, no award granted pursuant to, and no right to payment under, the 2009 LTI Plan will be assignable or transferable by a 2009 LTI Plan participant except by will or by the laws of descent and distribution or pursuant to a qualified domestic relations order, and any right granted under the 2009 LTI Plan will be exercisable during a participant’s lifetime only by the participant or by the participant’s guardian or legal representative.
Duration of the 2009 LTI Plan.  The 2009 LTI Plan will remain in effect until all options and rights granted thereunder have been satisfied or terminated pursuant to the terms of the 2009 LTI Plan and all performance periods for performance-based awards granted thereunder have been completed. However, in no event will any award be granted under the 2009 LTI Plan on or after May 8, 2019.
United States Federal Income Tax Consequences
The following summary is based on current interpretations of existing federal income tax laws. The discussion below is not purported to be complete, and it does not discuss the tax consequences arising in the context of the participant’s death or the income tax laws of any local, state or foreign country in which the participant’s income or gain may be taxable.
Stock Options.  Some of the options issuable under the 2009 LTI Plan may constitute incentive stock options within the meaning of Section 422 of the Code, while other options granted under the 2009 LTI Plan may be nonqualified stock options. The Code provides for tax treatment of stock options qualifying as incentive stock options that may be more favorable to employees than the tax treatment accorded nonqualified stock options.
Generally, upon the grant or exercise of an incentive stock option, the optionee will recognize no income for United States federal income tax purposes. The difference between the exercise price of the incentive stock option and the fair market value of the stock at the time of exercise is, however, an item of tax preference that may require payment of an alternative minimum tax. If the participant disposes of shares acquired by exercise of an incentive stock option either before the expiration of two years from the date the options are granted or within one year after the issuance of shares upon exercise of the incentive stock option (the “holding periods”), the participant will recognize in the year of disposition: (1) ordinary income to the extent that the lesser of either (a) the fair market value of the shares on the date of option exercise or (b) the amount realized upon disposition exceeds the option price and (2) capital gain to the extent the amount realized upon disposition exceeds the fair market value of the shares on the date of option exercise. If the shares are sold after expiration of the holding periods, the participant generally will recognize capital gain or loss equal to the difference between the amount realized upon disposition and the option price.
An optionee will recognize no income on the grant of a nonqualified stock option. Upon the exercise of a nonqualified stock option, the optionee will recognize ordinary taxable income (subject to withholding) in an


60


amount equal to the difference between the fair market value of the shares on the date of exercise and the exercise price. Upon any sale of such shares by the optionee, any difference between the sale price and the fair market value of the shares on the date of exercise of the nonqualified option will be treated generally as capital gain or loss.
No deduction is available to us upon the grant or exercise of an incentive stock option (although a deduction may be available if the employee sells the shares so purchased before the applicable holding period expires), whereas upon exercise of a nonqualified stock option, we are entitled to a deduction in an amount equal to the income recognized by the optionee. Except with respect to death or disability of an optionee, an optionee has three months after termination of employment in which to exercise an incentive stock option and retain favorable tax treatment at exercise. An option exercised more than three months after an optionee’s termination of employment (other than upon death or disability) cannot qualify for the tax treatment accorded incentive stock options; such options would be treated as nonqualified stock options instead.
Restricted Stock.  A participant generally recognizes no taxable income at the time of an award of restricted stock. A participant may, however, make an election under Section 83(b) of the Code to have the grant taxed as compensation income at the date of receipt, with the result that any future appreciation or depreciation in the value of the shares of stock granted may be taxed as capital gain or loss on a subsequent sale of the shares. If the participant does not make a Section 83(b) election, the grant will be taxed as compensation income at the full fair market value on the date the restrictions imposed on the shares expire. Unless a participant makes a Section 83(b) election, any dividends paid to the participant on the shares of restricted stock will generally be compensation income to the participant and deductible by us as compensation expense. In general, we will receive an income tax deduction for any compensation income taxed to the participant. To the extent a participant realizes capital gains, as described above, we will not be entitled to any deduction for federal income tax purposes.
Restricted Stock Units.  A participant who is granted a restricted stock unit will recognize no income upon grant of the restricted stock unit. At the time the underlying shares of common stock (or cash in lieu thereof) are delivered to a participant, the participant will realize compensation income equal to the full fair market value of the shares received. We will be entitled to an income tax deduction corresponding to the compensation income recognized by the participant.
Performance Share or Performance Unit Awards.  A participant who is granted a performance share or a performance unit award will recognize no income upon grant of the performance share or a performance unit award. At the time the common stock is received as payment in respect of a performance share or performance unit award, the participant will realize compensation income equal to the fair market value of the shares received. We will be entitled to an income tax deduction corresponding to the compensation income recognized by the participant.
Section 162(m).  Under Section 162(m) of the Code, compensation we pay in excess of $1 million for any taxable year to “Covered Employees” generally is deductible by us or our affiliates for federal income tax purposes if it is based on our performance, is paid pursuant to a plan approved by our stockholders and meets certain other requirements. Generally, “Covered Employee” under Section 162(m) of the Code means the chief executive officer and our three highest paid executive officers other than our chief financial officer on the last day of the taxable year.
Section 409A.  Section 409A of the Code generally provides that any deferred compensation arrangement must satisfy specific requirements, both in operation and in form, regarding (1) the timing of payment, (2) the election of deferrals, and (3) restrictions on the acceleration of payment. Failure to comply with Section 409A of the Code may result in the early taxation (plus interest) to the participant of deferred compensation and the imposition of a 20% penalty on the participant on such deferred amounts included in the participant’s income. The Company intends to structure awards under the Plan in a manner that is designed to be exempt from or comply with Section 409A of the Code.
Change in Control.  The acceleration of the exercisability or the vesting of a grant or award upon the occurrence of a change in control may result in an “excess parachute payment” within the meaning of Section 280G of the Code. A “parachute payment” occurs when an employee receives payments contingent upon a change in control that exceed an amount equal to three times his or her “base amount.” The term “base amount” generally means the average annual compensation paid to such employee during the five-year period preceding the change in control. An “excess parachute payment” is the excess of all parachute payments made to the employee on account of a change in control over the employee’s base amount. If any amount received by an employee is characterized as an


61


excess parachute payment, the employee is subject to a 20% excise tax on the amount of the excess, and the company is denied a deduction with respect to such excess payment.
We currently anticipate that the Compensation Committee will at all times consist of “outside directors” as required for purposes of Section 162(m) of the Code, and that the Compensation Committee will take the effect of Section 162(m) of the Code into consideration in structuring 2009 LTI Plan awards.
New Plan Benefits
The benefits that will be received under the 2009 LTI Plan by particular individuals or groups are not determinable at this time. Although not necessarily indicative of future grants that may be made under the 2009 LTI Plan, the following table sets forth with respect to each individual and group listed (1) the number of shares of restricted stock granted under the 2001 D&O Plan, and (2) the number of performance shares granted under the 2001 D&O Plan in each case during the last fiscal year. No other types of awards were granted under the 2001 D&O Plan during 2008.
         
  Performance
  Restricted
 
Name
 Shares  Stock 
 
John A. Fees  177,850   49,320 
Michael S. Taff  24,860   6,890 
Brandon C. Bethards  14,180   29,930 
Robert A. Deason  27,470   7,620 
John T. Nesser, III  46,900   13,010 
All executive officers as a group (10 persons)  332,700   131,240 
All non-employee directors as a group (9 persons)  0   17,046 
All employees other than executive officers as a group  300,080   207,610 
Equity Compensation Plan Information
             
  Number of
       
  Securities to be
     Number of
 
  Issued Upon
  Weighted-Average
  Securities
 
  Exercise of
  Exercise Price of
  Remaining
 
  Outstanding
  Outstanding
  Available for
 
Plan Category
 Options and Rights  Options and Rights  Future Issuance 
 
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders  756,164  $5.37   6,465,314 
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders(1)
  563,870  $3.38    
Total  1,320,034  $4.52   6,465,314 
(1)Reflects information on our 1992 Senior Management Stock Plan, which is our only equity compensation plan that has not been approved by our stockholders and that has any outstanding awards that have not been exercised. We are no longer authorized to grant new awards under our 1992 Senior Management Stock Plan.
Recommendation and Vote Required
Our Board of Directors unanimously recommends a vote “FOR” approval of this proposal. The proxy holders will vote all proxies received for approval of this proposal unless instructed otherwise. Our directors have an interest in and may benefit from the adoption of this proposal because they are eligible to receive awards under the 2009 LTI Plan. Approval of this proposal requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the outstanding shares of common stock present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote on this proposal at the Annual Meeting, provided that the total number of votes cast on the proposal represents a majority of the shares outstanding on the Record Date. Because abstentions are counted as present for purposes of the vote on this matter but are not votes “FOR” this proposal, they have the same effect as votes “AGAINST” this proposal. In general, brokers do not have discretionary authority on proposals relating to equity compensation plans. Therefore, absent instructions from you, your broker may not vote your shares on this proposal. Broker non-votes will have no effect on the vote, as long as the total number of votes cast on the proposal represents a majority of the shares entitled to vote.


62


RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2009
(ITEM 3)
Our Board of Directors has ratified the decision of the Audit Committee to appoint Deloitte & Touche LLP to serve as the independent registered public accounting firm to audit our financial statements for the year ending December 31, 2009.2012. Although we are not required to seek stockholder approval of this appointment, it has been our practice to do so. No determination has been made as to what action the Audit Committee and the Board of Directors would take if our stockholders fail to ratify the appointment. Even if the appointment is ratified, the Audit Committee retains discretion to appoint a new independent registered public accounting firm at any time if the Audit Committee concludes such a change would be in the best interests of McDermott. We expect that representativesRepresentatives of Deloitte & Touche LLPD&T will be present at the Annual Meeting and will have an opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so and to respond to appropriate questions.

For the years ended December 31, 20082011 and 2007,2010, McDermott paid Deloitte & Touche fees, including expenses and taxes, totaling $8,097,071$3,621,356 and $7,250,318,$5,888,537, which can be categorized as follows:

         
  2008  2007 
 
Audit
        
The Audit fees for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 were for professional services rendered for the audits of the consolidated financial statements of McDermott, the audit of McDermott’s internal control over financial reporting, statutory and subsidiary audits, reviews of the quarterly consolidated financial statements of McDermott and assistance with review of documents filed with the SEC $7,208,475  $6,770,200 
Audit-Related
        
The Audit-Related fees for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 were for assurance and related services, employee benefit plan audits and advisory services related to Sarbanes-Oxley Section 404 compliance $12,300  $10,118 
Tax
        
The Tax fees for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 were for professional services rendered for consultations on various U.S. federal, state and international tax matters, international tax compliance and tax planning, and assistance with tax examinations $807,046  $468,500 
All Other
        
The fees for All Other services for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 were for professional services rendered for translation services and other advisory or consultation services not related to audit or tax $69,250  $1,500 
Total
 $8,097,071  $7,250,318 

    2011   2010 

Audit

    

The Audit fees for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 were for professional services rendered for the audits of the consolidated financial statements of McDermott, the audit of McDermott’s internal control over financial reporting, statutory and subsidiary audits, reviews of the quarterly consolidated financial statements of McDermott and assistance with review of documents filed with the SEC.

  $3,220,477    $3,992,500(1) 

Audit-Related

    

The Audit-Related fees for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 were for assurance and related services, employee benefit plan audits and advisory services related to Sarbanes-Oxley Section 404 compliance.

  $114,367    $518,205(2) 

Tax

    

The Tax fees for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 were for professional services rendered for consultations on various U.S. federal, state and international tax matters, international tax compliance and tax planning, and assistance with tax examinations.

  $286,512    $1,232,498(3) 

All Other

    

The fees for All Other services for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 were for professional services rendered for translation services and other advisory or consultation services not related to audit or tax.

  $0    $145,334(4) 

Total

  $3,621,356    $5,888,537  

(1)Audit fees for 2010 include $215,000 of fees paid by McDermott attributable to the audit of B&W.

(2)Audit-Related fees for 2010 include $480,205 of fees paid by McDermott attributable to audit-related services for B&W.

(3)Tax fees for 2010 include $91,800 of fees paid by McDermott attributable to tax services for B&W.

(4)All Other fees for 2010 include $140,000 of fees paid by McDermott attributable to other services for B&W.

It is the policy of our Audit Committee to preapprove all audit, review or attest engagements and permissible non-audit services to be performed by our independent registered public accounting firm, subject to, and in compliance with, thede minimisexception for non-audit services described in Section 10A(i)(1)(B) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the applicable rules and regulations of the SEC. Our Audit Committee did not rely on thede minimisexception for any of the fees disclosed above.

Recommendation and Vote Required

Our Board of Directors recommends that stockholders vote “FOR” the ratification of the decision of our Audit Committee to appoint Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2009.2012. The proxy holders will vote all proxies received for approval of this proposal unless instructed otherwise. Approval of this proposal requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the outstanding shares of common stock present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote and actually voting on this proposal at the Annual Meeting. Because abstentions are counted as present for purposesnot actual votes with respect to this proposal, they have no effect on the outcome of the vote on this matter but are not votes “FOR” this proposal, theyproposal.

SECURITY OWNERSHIPOF DIRECTORSAND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

The following table sets forth the number of shares of our common stock beneficially owned as of February 29, 2012 by each director or nominee as a director, and each Named Executive and all our directors and executive officers as a group, including shares that those persons have the same effectright to acquire within 60 days on the vesting of restricted stock units or the exercise of stock options.

Name

Shares

Beneficially

Owned

John F. Bookout, III(1)

40,106

Roger A. Brown(2)

74,766

Gary L. Carlson(3)

44,423

Perry L. Elders(4)

41,030

Stephen G. Hanks

16,620

Liane K. Hinrichs(5)

205,715

Stephen M. Johnson(6)

514,834

D. Bradley McWilliams(7)

70,671

John T. McCormack(8)

70,845

John T. Nesser(9)

409,470

Thomas C. Schievelbein(10)

103,108

Mary Shafer-Malicki

6,790

David A. Trice

16,165

All directors and executive officers as a group (16 persons)(11)

1,938,545

(1)Shares owned by Mr. Bookout include 6,105 shares of common stock that he may acquire on the exercise of stock options, as described above.

(2)Shares owned by Mr. Brown include 38,085 shares of common stock that he may acquire on the exercise of stock options, as described above.

(3)Shares owned by Mr. Carlson include 20,064 shares of common stock that he may acquire on the exercise of stock options, as described above, 14,654 shares of common stock that he will acquire on the vesting of restricted stock units, as described above, and 42 shares of common stock held in the McDermott Thrift Plan.

(4)Shares owned by Mr. Elders include 28,274 shares of common stock that he may acquire on the exercise of stock options, as described above, 3,250 shares of common stock that he will acquire on the vesting of restricted stock units, as described above, and 27 shares of common stock held in the McDermott Thrift Plan.

(5)Shares owned by Ms. Hinrichs include 64,772 shares of common stock that she may acquire on the exercise of stock options, as described above, 65,975 shares of common stock that she will acquire on the vesting of restricted stock units, as described above, and 2,980 shares of common stock held in the McDermott Thrift Plan.

(6)Shares owned by Mr. Johnson include 297,605 shares of common stock that he may acquire on the exercise of stock options, as described above, 44,831 shares of common stock that he will acquire on the vesting of restricted stock units, as described above, and 637 shares of common stock held in the McDermott Thrift Plan.

(7)Shares owned by Mr. McWilliams include 37,876 shares of common stock that he may acquire on the exercise of stock options, as described above.

(8)Shares owned by Mr. McCormack include 34,994 shares of common stock that he may acquire on the exercise of stock options, as described above, 34,546 shares of common stock that he will acquire on the vesting of restricted stock units, as described above, and 1,305 shares of common stock held in the McDermott Thrift Plan.

(9)Shares owned by Mr. Nesser include 62,121 shares of common stock held in a grantor retained annuity trust of which he is trustee and has indirect beneficial ownership, 69,717 shares of common stock that he may acquire on the exercise of stock options, as described above, and 8,276 shares of common stock that he will acquire on the vesting of restricted stock units.

(10)Shares owned by Mr. Schievelbein include 72,538 shares of common stock that he may acquire on the exercise of stock options, as described above.

(11)Shares owned by all directors and executive officers as a group include 792,219 shares of common stock that may be acquired on the exercise of stock options, as described above, 213,188 shares of common stock that may be acquired on the vesting of restricted stock units, as described above, and 23,172 shares of common stock held in the McDermott Thrift Plan.

Shares beneficially owned in all cases constituted less than one percent of the outstanding shares of common stock on February 29, 2012, as votes “AGAINST” this proposal.


63determined in accordance with Rule 13d-3(d)(1) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.


SECURITY OWNERSHIPOF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS

The following table furnishes information concerning all persons known by us to beneficially own 5% or more of our outstanding shares of common stock, which is our only class of voting stock outstanding:

Title of ClassName and Address of Beneficial Owner

Amount
and

Nature of

Beneficial

Ownership

Percent of

Class(1)

Common Stock

T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc.

100 E. Pratt Street

Baltimore, MD 21202

37,243,988(2)15.84

Common Stock

BlackRock, Inc.

40 East 52nd Street

New York, NY 10022

15,391,846(3)6.55

Common Stock

Artisan Partners Holdings LP

875 East Wisconsin Avenue

Suite 800

Milwaukee, WI 53202

13,551,800(4)5.77

Common Stock

PRIMECAP Management Company

225 South Lake Ave., #400

Pasadena, CA 91101

12,406,760(5)5.28

Common Stock

FMR LLC

82 Devonshire Street

Boston, MA 02109

11,820,617(6)5.03

(1)Percent is based on outstanding shares of our common stock on February 29, 2012.

(2)As reported on Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 10, 2012. The Schedule 13G/A reports beneficial ownership of 37,243,988 shares of our common stock by T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. (“Price Associates”), which has sole voting power over 8,642,022 shares and sole dispositive power over 37,243,988 shares. These securities are owned by various individual and institutional investors, including T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Fund, which has sole voting power over 13,000,000 shares and sole dispositive power over no shares, for which Price Associates serves as an investment adviser with power to direct investments and/or sole power to vote the securities. For the purposes of the reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Price Associates is deemed to be the beneficial owner of such securities; however, Price Associates expressly disclaims that it is, in fact, the beneficial owner of such securities.

(3)As reported on Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 13, 2012. The Schedule 13G/A reports beneficial ownership of 15,391,846 shares of our common stock and sole voting power and sole dispositive power over 15,391,846 shares.

(4)As reported on Schedule 13G filed on February 7, 2012. The Schedule 13G reports beneficial ownership of 13,551,800 shares of our common stock, shared voting power over 13,219,900 shares and shared dispositive power over 13,551,800 shares.

(5)As reported on Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 13, 2012. The Schedule 13G/A reports beneficial ownership of 12,406,760 shares of our common stock, sole voting power over 6,929,160 shares and sole dispositive power over 12,406,760 shares.

(6)As reported on Schedule 13G filed jointly by FMR LLC, Edward C. Johnson 3d and Fidelity Management & Research Company with the SEC on February 14, 2012. According to the Schedule 13G, FMR LLC has sole voting power over 880,417 shares and sole dispositive power over 11,820,617 shares. Of the shares reported, 10,940,200 shares are beneficially owned by Fidelity Management & Research Company, an investment adviser and a wholly-owned subsidiary of FMR LLC, as a result of acting as investment advisor to various investment companies (collectively, the “Fidelity Funds”); and each of FMR LLC and Mr. Edward C. Johnson 3d exercise sole dispositive power and the Fidelity Funds’ Board of Trustees exercises sole voting power with respect to these shares. In addition, FMR LLC and Mr. Edward C. Johnson 3d each exercise sole dispositive power and sole voting power with respect to 454 shares.

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPSAND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

Pursuant to our Code of Business Conduct, all employees (including our Named Executives) who have, or whose immediate family members have, any direct or indirect financial or other participation in any business that competes with, supplies goods or services to, or is a customer, of McDermott, are required to disclose to us and receive written approval from our Corporate Ethics and Compliance department prior to transacting such business. Our employees are expected to make reasoned and impartial decisions in the workplace. As a result, approval of the business is denied if we believe that the employee’s interest in such business could influence decisions relative to our business, or have the potential to adversely affect our business or the objective performance of the employee’s work. Our Corporate Ethics and Compliance department implements our Code of Business Conduct and related policies and the Governance Committee of our Board is responsible for overseeing our Ethics and Compliance Program, including compliance with our Code of Business Conduct. Our Board members are also responsible for complying with our Code of Business Conduct. Additionally, our Governance Committee is responsible for reviewing the professional occupations and associations of our Board members and reviews transactions between McDermott and other companies with which our Board members are affiliated. To obtain a copy of our Code of Business Conduct, please see the “Corporate Governance” section above in this proxy statement.

Our grant agreements for restricted stock units awarded under various long-term incentive plans provide that the withholding obligation of any applicable federal, state or other taxes that may be due on the vesting of those awards be satisfied by the grantee returning to us the number of such vested shares having a fair market value equal to the amount of such taxes. Accordingly, in the year ending December 31, 2012, this withholding method will apply to an aggregate of 209,208 shares held by Mr. Johnson, 16,137 shares held by Mr. Elders, 14,654 shares held by Mr. Carlson, 10,302 shares held by Mr. Cummins, 65,975 shares held by Ms. Hinrichs, 15,577 shares held by Mr. Daniel M. Houser, 37,232 shares held by Mr. McCormack, 10,057 shares held by Mr. Mitchell and 21,297 shares held by Mr. Roll.

In the year ended December 31, 2011, a similar withholding method applied with respect to certain of

Each of

our grant agreements, and Messrs. Fees, Taff, Bethards, Deason,Johnson, Elders, Houser, McCormack, Mitchell, Nesser Baldwin, Johnson and LewisRoll and Ms. Hinrichs has irrevocably elected to satisfy withholding obligations relating to all or a portion of any applicable federal, state or other taxes that maywould be due on the vesting in the year ending December 31, 2009 of certain shares of restricted stock and performance sharesrestricted stock units awarded under various long-term incentive plans by returning to usthat did not provide for a withholding method in the number of such vested shares having a fair market value equal to the amount of such taxes.same manner. These elections which applywere subject to an aggregate of 110,940 shares held by Mr. Fees, 27,047 shares held by Mr. Taff, 32,477 shares held by Mr. Bethards, 56,540 shares held by Mr. Deason, 44,837 shares held by Mr. Nesser, 700 shares held by Mr. Baldwin, 900 shares held by Mr. Johnson, 18,664 shares held by Mr. Lewis and 23,177 shares held by Ms. Hinrichs, are subject tothe approval of the Compensation Committee of our Board, which approval was granted. In the year ended December 31, 2008, each of Messrs. Wilkinson, Deason and Nesser and our former officers James R. Easter, Francis S. Kalman and Louis J. Sannino made a similar election whichAccordingly, this withholding method applied to an aggregate of 82,200, 75,000, 28,200, 11,700, 43,500205,316 shares held by Mr. Johnson, 12,887 shares held by Mr. Elders, 13,137 shares held by Mr. Carlson, 9,165 shares held by Mr. Cummins, 119,901 shares held by Ms. Hinrichs, 19,452 shares held by Mr. Houser, 29,822 shares held by Mr. McCormack, 14,021 shares held by Mr. Mitchell, 85,423 shares held by Mr. Nesser and 18,30021,479 shares respectively, that vested in the year ended December 31, 2008. Those elections were also approvedheld by the Compensation Committee. Mr. Roll.

We expect any transfers reflecting shares of restrictedMcDermott stock returned to us will be reported in the SEC filings made by those transferring holders who are obligated to report transactions in our securities under Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

Additionally, during 2011, the Investment Committee of the McDermott Master Trust (the “Trust”), the funding vehicle underlying the Retirement Plan, entered into an agreement with BlackRock Institutional Trust Company, N.A. (“BlackRock”), pursuant to which BlackRock agreed to manage the investment of a portion of the Trust assets. BlackRock is a subsidiary of BlackRock, Inc. and, collectively with certain other subsidiaries of BlackRock, Inc., owned approximately 6.55% of McDermott common stock on December 31, 2011 as reported on BlackRock, Inc.’s Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 13, 2012. The amount of Trust assets under management with BlackRock may vary from time to time. As of December 31, 2011, the value of the Trust assets under management with BlackRock was approximately $78.6 million. BlackRock receives a fee for investment management services for the portion of the Trust assets allocated to BlackRock. These fees are calculated quarterly in arrears by averaging the account’s prior three month-end market values and applying 25% of the annual fee schedule (6.0 basis points), or 1.5 basis points quarterly.

 

The Investment Committee of the Trust is a fiduciary of the Retirement Plan appointed by McDermott’s subsidiary that maintains the Retirement Plan. The Investment Committee is responsible for the management and control of the Trust assets and is authorized to appoint fund managers under the

terms of the Retirement Plan and the Trust. Selection of fund managers is performed with the assistance of a third party investment consulting firm, in accordance with an investment policy statement approved and adopted by the Investment Committee.

SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP COMPLIANCE

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires our directors and executive officers, and persons who own 10% or more of our voting stock, to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership of our equity securities with the SEC and the New York Stock Exchange. Directors, executive officers and 10% or more holders are required by SEC regulations to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file. Based solely on a review

of the copies of those forms furnished to us, or written representations that no forms were required, we believe that our directors, executive officers and 10% or more beneficial owners complied with all Section 16(a) filing requirements during the year ended December 31, 2008,2011, with the exception of John A. Fees, Chief Executive Officer of McDermott, and Robert W. Goldman, Director. Mr. Fees underreported shares from two transactions in a timelyMs. Hinrichs, who filed one late Form 4 which was amended two days later to reflect the correct number of shares. Mr. Goldman was late filing a Form 4 to reportreporting one open market purchases occurring in six broker directed transactions.

STOCKHOLDERS’ PROPOSALSsale transaction.

 

STOCKHOLDERS’ PROPOSALS

Any stockholder who wishes to have a qualified proposal considered for inclusion in our proxy statement for our 20102013 Annual Meeting must send notice of the proposal to our Corporate Secretary at our principal executive office no later than November 27, 2009.30, 2012. If you make such a proposal, you must provide your name, address, the number of shares of common stock you hold of record or beneficially, the date or dates on which such common stock was acquired and documentary support for any claim of beneficial ownership.


64


In addition, any stockholder who intends to submit a proposal for consideration at our 20102013 Annual Meeting, but not for inclusion in our proxy materials, or who intends to submit nominees for election as directors at the meeting must notify our Corporate Secretary. Under our By-Laws, such notice must (1) be received at our executive offices no earlier than November 9, 200911, 2012 or later than January 8, 201010, 2013, and (2) satisfy specified requirements. A copy of the pertinent By-Law provisions can be found on our Web site atwww.mcdermott.comat “Corporate“About Us — Leadership & Corporate Governance — Governance Policies.Corporate Governance.

By Order of the Board of Directors,

-s- Liane K. Hinrichs

LIANE K. HINRICHS

Secretary
Dated: March 27, 2009


65


Secretary

APPENDIX A
2009 MCDERMOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC.
LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN
ARTICLE I
Establishment, Objectives and Duration
1.1  Establishment of the Plan.  McDermott International, Inc., a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the Republic of Panama (hereinafter referred to as the “Company”), hereby establishes an incentive compensation plan to be known as the 2009 McDermott International, Inc. Long-Term Incentive Plan (hereinafter referred to as this “Plan”), as set forth in this document. This Plan permits the grant of Nonqualified Stock Options, Incentive Stock Options, Restricted Stock, Restricted Stock Units, Performance Shares and Performance Units (each as hereinafter defined).
Subject to approval by the Company’s stockholders, this Plan shall become effective as of May 8, 2009 (the “Effective Date”) and shall remain in effect as provided in Section 1.3 hereof.
1.2  Objectives.  This Plan is designed to promote the success and enhance the value of the Company by linking the personal interests of Participants (as hereinafter defined) to those of the Company’s stockholders, and by providing Participants with an incentive for outstanding performance. This Plan is further intended to provide flexibility to the Company in its ability to motivate, attract and retain the employmentand/or services of Participants.
1.3  Duration.  This Plan, as amended and restated, shall commence on the Effective Date, as described in Section 1.1 hereof, and shall remain in effect, subject to the right of the Board of Directors (as hereinafter defined) to amend or terminate this Plan at any time pursuant to Article 15 hereof, until all Shares (as hereinafter defined) subject to it shall have been purchased or acquired according to this Plan’s provisions; provided, however, that in no event may an Award (as hereinafter defined) be granted under this Plan on or after May 8, 2019.
ARTICLE 2
Definitions
As used in this Plan, the following terms shall have the respective meanings set forth below:
2.1  “Award”means a grant under this Plan of any Nonqualified Stock Option, Incentive Stock Option, Restricted Stock, Restricted Stock Unit, Performance Share or Performance Unit.
2.2  “Award Agreement”means an agreement entered into by the Company and a Participant, setting forth the terms and provisions applicable to an Award granted under this Plan.
2.3  “Award Limitations”has the meaning ascribed to such term in Section 4.2.
2.4  “Beneficial Owner”or“Beneficial Ownership”shall have the meaning ascribed to such term inRule 13d-3 of the General Rules and Regulations under the Exchange Act.
2.5  “Board”or“Board of Directors”means the Board of Directors of the Company.
2.6  “Change in Control”means the occurrence or existence of any of the following facts or circumstances after the Effective Date:
(a) Any person (other than a trustee or other fiduciary holding securities under an Employee benefit plan of the Company or a corporation or other entity owned, directly or indirectly, by the stockholders of the Company in substantially the same proportions as their ownership of stock of the Company) is or becomes the Beneficial Owner, directly or indirectly, of securities of the Company representing thirty percent (30%) or more of the combined voting power of the Company’s then outstanding voting securities;


A-1


APPENDIX A
(b) Within any period of two (2) consecutive years (not including any period prior to the Effective Date), individuals who at the beginning of such period constitute the Board, and any new Directors (other than a Director designated by a Person who has entered into an agreement with the Company to effect any transaction described in Clause (a), (c), (d) or (e) of this Section 2.6) whose election by the Board or nomination for election by the stockholders of the Company, was approved by a vote of at least two-thirds (2/3) of the Directors, then still in office who either were Directors at the beginning of the period or whose election or nomination for election was previously so approved, cease for any reason to constitute a majority of the Board;
(c) A merger or consolidation of the Company, with any other corporation or other entity has been consummated, other than a merger or consolidation which results in the voting securities of the Company outstanding immediately prior thereto continuing to represent (either by remaining outstanding or by being converted into voting securities of the surviving entity) at least fifty percent (50%) of the combined voting power of the voting securities of the Company or the surviving entity outstanding immediately after such merger or consolidation;
(d) The shareholders of the Company approve: (i) a plan of complete liquidation of the Company; or (ii) an agreement for the sale or disposition by the Company of all or substantially all of the Company’s assets; or
(e) Within one year following the consummation of a merger or consolidation transaction involving the Company (whether as a constituent corporation, the acquiror, the direct or indirect parent entity of the acquiror, the entity being acquired, or the direct or indirect parent entity of the entity being acquired): (i) individuals who, at the time of the execution and delivery of the definitive agreement pursuant to which such transaction has been consummated by the parties thereto (a “Definitive Transaction Agreement”) (or, if there are multiple such agreements relating to such transaction, the first time of execution and delivery by the parties to any such agreement) (the “Execution Time”), constituted the Board cease, for any reason (excluding death, disability or voluntary resignation but including any such voluntary resignation effected in accordance with any Definitive Transaction Agreement), to constitute a majority of the Board; or (ii) either individual who, at the Execution Time, served as the Chief Executive Officer or Chief Financial Officer of the Company does not, for any reason (excluding as a result of death, disability or voluntary termination but including any such voluntary termination effected in accordance with any Definitive Transaction Agreement), serve as the Chief Executive Officer or Chief Financial Officer, as applicable, of the Company or, if the Company does not continue as a registrant with a class of equity securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act, as the Chief Executive Officer or Chief Financial Officer, as applicable, of a corporation or other entity that is (A) a registrant with a class of equity securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act and (B) the surviving entity in such transaction or a direct or indirect parent entity of the surviving entity or the Company following the consummation of such transaction; provided, however, that a Change in Control shall not be deemed to have occurred pursuant to this clause (e) in the case of a merger or consolidation which results in the voting securities of the Company outstanding immediately prior thereto continuing to represent (either by remaining outstanding or by being converted into voting securities of the surviving entity) at least 55% of the combined voting power of the voting securities of the Company or the surviving entity outstanding immediately after such merger or consolidation.
However, in no event shall a “Change in Control” be deemed to have occurred with respect to a Participant if the Participant is part of the purchasing group which consummates a transaction resulting in aChange-in-Control. A Participant shall be deemed “part of a purchasing group” for purposes of the preceding sentence if the Participant is an equity participant in the purchasing company or group (except for: (i) passive ownership of less than three percent (3%) of the stock of the purchasing company; or (ii) ownership of equity participation in the purchasing company or group which is otherwise not significant, as determined prior to the Change in Control by a majority of the non-employee continuing Directors).
2.7  “Code”means the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended from time to time.


A-2


APPENDIX A
2.8  “Committee”means the Compensation Committee of the Board, or such other committee of the Board appointed by the Board to administer this Plan (or the entire Board if so designated by the Board by written resolution), as specified in Article 3 hereof.
2.9  “Company”means McDermott International, Inc., a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the Republic of Panama, and, except where the context otherwise indicates, shall include the Company’s Subsidiaries and, except with respect to the definition of “Change in Control” set forth above and the application of any defined terms used in such definition, any successor to any of such entities as provided in Article 18 hereof.
2.10  “Consultant”means a natural person who is neither an Employee nor a Director and who performs services for the Company or a Subsidiary pursuant to a contract, provided that those services are not in connection with the offer or sale of securities in a capital-raising transaction and do not directly or indirectly promote or maintain a market for the Company’s securities.
2.11  “Director”means any individual who is a member of the Board of Directors;provided, however, that any member of the Board of Directors who is employed by the Company shall be considered an Employee under this Plan.
2.12  “Disability”in the case of an Employee, shall have the meaning ascribed to such term in the Participant’s governing long-term disability plan and, in the case of a Director or Consultant, shall mean a permanent and total disability within the meaning of Section 22 (e)(3) of the Code, as determined by the Committee in good faith, upon receipt of medical advice that the Committee deems sufficient and competent, from one or more individuals selected by the Committee who are qualified to provide professional medical advice.
2.13  “Effective Date”shall have the meaning ascribed to such term in Section 1.1 hereof.
2.14  “Employee”means any person who is employed by the Company.
2.15  “Exchange Act”means the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended from time to time.
2.16  “ERISA” means the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended from time to time.
2.17  “Fair Market Value”of a Share shall mean, as of a particular date, (a) if Shares are listed on a national securities exchange, the closing sales price per Share on the consolidated transaction reporting system for the principal national securities exchange on which Shares are listed on that date, or, if no such sale is so reported on that date, on the last preceding date on which such a sale was so reported, (b) if no Shares are so listed but are traded on an over-the-counter market, the mean between the closing bid and asked prices for Shares on that date, or, if there are no such quotations available for that date, on the last preceding date for which such quotations are available, as reported by the National Quotation Bureau Incorporated, or (c) if no Shares are publicly traded, the most recent value determined by an independent appraiser appointed by the Company for that purpose.
2.18  “Fiscal Year”means the year commencing January 1 and ending December 31.
2.19  “Incentive Stock Option”or“ISO”means an Option to purchase Shares granted under Article 6 hereof and which is designated as an Incentive Stock Option and is intended to meet the requirements of Code Section 422, or any successor provision.
2.20  “Named Executive Officer”means a Participant who, as of the date of vestingand/or payout of an award is one of the group of “covered employees” as defined in Section 162(m) of the Code and the regulations promulgated thereunder.
2.21  “Nonqualified Stock Option”or“NQSO”means an option to purchase Shares granted under Article 6 hereof and which is not an Incentive Stock Option.
2.22  “Officer”means an Employee of the Company included in the definition of “Officer” under Section 16 of the Exchange Act and rules and regulations promulgated thereunder or such other Employees who are designated as “Officers” by the Board.


A-3


APPENDIX A
2.23  “Option”means an Incentive Stock Option or a Nonqualified Stock Option.
2.24  “Option Price”means the price at which a Share may be purchased by a Participant pursuant to an Option, as determined by the Committee.
2.25  “Participant”means an eligible Officer, Director, Consultant or Employee who has been selected for participation in this Plan in accordance with Section 5.2.
2.26  “Performance-Based Award”means an Award that is designed to qualify for the Performance-Based Exception.
2.27  “Performance-Based Exception”means the performance-based exception from the deductibility limitations of Code Section 162(m).
2.28  “Performance Period”means, with respect to a Performance-Based Award, the period of time during which the performance goals specified in such Award must be met in order to determine the degree of payoutand/or vesting with respect to that Performance-Based Award.
2.29  “Performance Share”means an Award designated as such and granted to an Employee, as described in Article 8 hereof.
2.30  “Performance Unit”means an Award designated as such and granted to an Employee, as described in Article 8 herein.
2.31  “Period of Restriction”means the period during which the transfer of Shares of Restricted Stock is limited in some way (based on the passage of time, the achievement of performance goals, or upon the occurrence of other events as determined by the Committee, in its sole discretion) as set forth in the related Award Agreement,and/or the Shares are subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture, as provided in Article 7 hereof.
2.32  “Person”shall have the meaning ascribed to such term in Section 3(a)(9) of the Exchange Act and used in Section 13(d) and 14(d) thereof, including a “group” (as that term is used in Section 13(d)(3) thereof).
2.33  “Restricted Stock”means an Award designated as such and granted to a Participant pursuant to Article 7 hereof.
2.34  “Restricted Stock Unit”or“RSU”means a contractual promise to distribute to a Participant one Share or cash equal to the Fair Market Value of one Share, determined in the sole discretion of the Committee, which shall be delivered to the Participant upon satisfaction of the vesting and any other requirements set forth in the related Award Agreement.
2.35  “Retirement”shall have the meaning ascribed to such term by the Committee, as set forth in the applicable Award Agreement.
2.36  “Shares”means the common stock, par value $1.00 per share, of the Company.
2.37  “Subsidiary”means any corporation, partnership, joint venture, affiliate or other entity in which the Company has a majority voting interest and which the Committee designates as a participating entity in this plan.
2.38  “Vesting Period”means the period during which an Award granted hereunder is subject to a service or performance-related restriction, as set forth in the related Award Agreement.


A-4


APPENDIX A
ARTICLE 3
Administration
3.1  The Committee.  This Plan shall be administered by the Committee. The members of the Committee shall be appointed from time to time by, and shall serve at the discretion of, the Board of Directors.
3.2  Authority of the Committee.  Except as limited by law or by the Articles of Incorporation or Amended and Restated By-Laws of the Company (each as amended from time to time), the Committee shall have full and exclusive power and authority to take all actions specifically contemplated by this Plan or that are necessary or appropriate in connection with the administration hereof and shall also have full and exclusive power and authority to interpret this Plan and to adopt such rules, regulations and guidelines for carrying out this Plan as the Committee may deem necessary or proper. The Committee shall have full power and sole discretion to: select Officers, Directors, Consultants and Employees who shall be granted Awards under this Plan; determine the sizes and types of Awards; determine the time when Awards are to be granted and any conditions that must be satisfied before an Award is granted; determine the terms and conditions of Awards in a manner consistent with this Plan; determine whether the conditions for earning an Award have been met and whether a Performance-Based Award will be paid at the end of an applicable performance period; determine the guidelinesand/or procedures for the payment or exercise of Awards; and determine whether a Performance-Based Award should qualify, regardless of its amount, as deductible in its entirety for federal income tax purposes, including whether a Performance-Based Award granted to an Officer should qualify as performance-based compensation. The Committee may, in its sole discretion, accelerate the vesting or exercisability of an Award, eliminate or make less restrictive any restrictions contained in an Award, waive any restriction or other provision of this Plan or any Award or otherwise amend or modify any Award in any manner that is either (a) not adverse to the Participant to whom such Award was granted or (b) consented to in writing by such Participant, and (c) consistent with the requirements of Code Section 409A, if applicable. The Committee may correct any defect or supply any omission or reconcile any inconsistency in this Plan or in any Award in the manner and to the extent the Committee deems necessary or desirable to further this Plan’s objectives. Further, the Committee shall make all other determinations that may be necessary or advisable for the administration of this Plan. As permitted by law and the terms of this Plan, the Committee may delegate its authority as identified herein.
3.3  Delegation of Authority.  To the extent permitted under applicable law, the Committee may delegate to the Chief Executive Officer and to other senior officers of the Company its duties under this Plan pursuant to such conditions or limitations as the Committee may establish; provided however, the Committee may not delegate any authority to grant Awards to a Director.
3.4  Decisions Binding.  All determinations and decisions made by the Committee pursuant to the provisions of this Plan and all related orders and resolutions of the Committee shall be final, conclusive and binding on all persons concerned, including the Company, its stockholders, Officers, Directors, Employees, Consultants, Participants and their estates and beneficiaries.
ARTICLE 4
Shares Subject to this Plan
4.1  Number of Shares Available for Grants of Awards.  Subject to adjustment as provided in Section 4.3 hereof, there is reserved for issuance of Awards under this Plan nine million (9,000,000) Shares. Shares subject to Awards under this Plan that are cancelled, forfeited, terminated or expire unexercised, shall immediately become available for the granting of Awards under this Plan. Additionally, Shares approved pursuant to the 2001 Directors and Officers Long Term Incentive Plan which have not been awarded as of the Effective Date, or are subject to awards that are canceled, terminated, forfeited, expire unexercised, are settled in cash in lieu of Shares, or are exchanged for consideration that does not involve Shares will immediately become available for Awards. The Committee may from time to time adopt and observe such procedures concerning the counting of Shares against this Plan maximum as it may deem appropriate.


A-5


APPENDIX A
4.2  Limits on Grants in Any Fiscal Year.  The following rules (“Award Limitations”) shall apply to grants of Awards under this Plan:
(a) Options.  The maximum aggregate number of Shares issuable pursuant to Awards of Options that may be granted in any one Fiscal Year of the Company to any one Participant shall be one million two hundred thousand (1,200,000).
(b) Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units.  The maximum aggregate number of Shares subject to Awards of Restricted Stock and RSUs that may be granted in any one Fiscal Year to any one Participant shall be one million two hundred thousand (1,200,000).
(c) Performance Shares.  The maximum aggregate number of Shares subject to Awards of Performance Shares that may be granted in any one Fiscal Year to any one Participant shall be one million two hundred thousand (1,200,000).
(d) Performance Units.  The maximum aggregate cash payout with respect to Performance Units granted in any one Fiscal Year to any one Participant shall be six million dollars ($6,000,000), with such cash value determined as of the date of each grant.
4.3  Adjustments in Authorized Shares.  The existence of outstanding Awards shall not affect in any manner the right or power of the Company or its stockholders to make or authorize any or all adjustments, recapitalizations, reorganizations or other changes in the capital stock of the Company or its business or any merger or consolidation of the Company, or any issue of bonds, debentures, preferred or prior preference stock (whether or not such issue is prior to, on a parity with or junior to the Shares) or the dissolution or liquidation of the Company, or any sale or transfer of all or any part of its assets or business or any other corporate act or proceeding of any kind, whether or not of a character similar to that of the acts or proceedings enumerated above.
If there shall be any change in the Shares of the Company or the capitalization of the Company through merger, consolidation, reorganization, recapitalization, stock dividend, stock split, reverse stock split,split-up, spin-off, combination of shares, exchange of shares, dividend in kind or other like change in capital structure or distribution (other than normal cash dividends) to stockholders of the Company, the Committee, in its sole discretion, in order to prevent dilution or enlargement of Participants’ rights under this Plan, shall adjust, in such manner as it deems equitable, as applicable, the number and kind of Shares that may be granted as Awards under this Plan, the number and kind of Shares subject to outstanding Awards, the exercise or other price applicable to outstanding Awards, the Awards Limitations, the Fair Market Value of the Shares and other value determinations applicable to outstanding Awards;provided, however, that the number of Shares subject to any Award shall always be a whole number. In the event of a corporate merger, consolidation, acquisition of property or stock, separation, reorganization or liquidation, the Committee shall be authorized, in its sole discretion, to: (a) grant or assume Awards by means of substitution of new Awards, as appropriate, for previously granted Awards or to assume previously granted Awards as part of such adjustment; (b) make provision, prior to the transaction, for the acceleration of the vesting and exercisability of, or lapse of restrictions with respect to, Awards and the termination of Options that remain unexercised at the time of such transaction; (c) provide for the acceleration of the vesting and exercisability of Options and the cancellation thereof in exchange for such payment as the Committee, in its sole discretion, determines is a reasonable approximation of the value thereof; (d) cancel any Awards and direct the Company to deliver to the Participants who are the holders of such Awards cash in an amount that the Committee shall determine in its sole discretion is equal to the fair market value of such Awards as of the date of such event, which, in the case of any Option, shall be the amount equal to the excess of the Fair Market Value of a Share as of such date over the per-share exercise price for such Option (for the avoidance of doubt, if such exercise price is less than such Fair Market Value, the Option may be canceled for no consideration); or (e) cancel Awards that are Options and give the Participants who are the holders of such Awards notice and opportunity to exercise prior to such cancellation.


A-6


APPENDIX A
ARTICLE 5
Eligibility and Participation
5.1  Eligibility.  Persons eligible to participate in this Plan include all Officers, Directors, Employees and Consultants, as determined in the sole discretion of the Committee.
5.2  Actual Participation.  Subject to the provisions of this Plan, the Committee may, from time to time, select from all Officers, Directors, Employees and Consultants, those to whom Awards shall be granted and shall determine the nature and amount of each Award. No Officer, Director, Employee or Consultant shall have the right to be selected for Participation in this Plan, or, having been so selected, to be selected to receive a future award.
ARTICLE 6
Options
6.1  Grant of Options.  Subject to the terms and provisions of this Plan, Options may be granted to Participants in such number, upon such terms, at any time, and from time to time, as shall be determined by the Committee;provided, however,that ISOs may be awarded only to Employees. Subject to the terms of this Plan, the Committee shall have discretion in determining the number of Shares subject to Options granted to each Participant.
6.2  Option Award Agreement.  Each Option grant shall be evidenced by an Award Agreement that shall specify the Option Price, the duration of the Option, the number of Shares to which the Option pertains, and such other provisions as the Committee shall determine that are not inconsistent with the terms of this Plan. The Award Agreement also shall specify whether the Option is intended to be an ISO or an NQSO (provided that, in the absence of such specification, the Option shall be an NQSO).
6.3  Option Price.  The Option Price for each grant of an Option under this Plan shall be as determined by the Committee;provided, however, that, subject to any subsequent adjustment that may be made pursuant to the provisions of Section 4.3 hereof, the Option Price shall be not less than one hundred percent (100%) of the Fair Market Value of a Share on the date the Option is granted. Except as otherwise provided in Section 4.3 hereof, without prior stockholder approval no repricing of Options awarded under this Plan shall be permitted such that the terms of outstanding Options may not be amended to reduce the Option Price and further Options may not be replaced or regranted through cancellation, in exchange for cash, other Awards, or if the effect of the replacement or regrant would be to reduce the Option Price of the Options or would constitute a repricing under generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (as applicable to the Company’s public reporting).
6.4  Duration of Options.  Subject to any earlier expiration that may be effected pursuant to the provisions of Section 4.3 hereof, each Option shall expire at such time as the Committee shall determine at the time of grant;provided, however, that an Option shall not be exercisable later than the seventh (7th) anniversary date of its grant.
6.5  Exercise of Options.  Options granted under this Plan shall be exercisable at such times and be subject to such restrictions and conditions as the Committee shall in each instance approve, which need not be the same for each grant or for each Participant.
6.6  Payment.  Any Option granted under this Article 6 shall be exercised by the delivery of a notice of exercise to the Company in the manner prescribed in the related Award Agreement, setting forth the number of Shares with respect to which the Option is to be exercised, and either (i) accompanied by full payment of the Option Price for the Shares issuable on such exercise or (ii) exercised in a manner that is in accordance with applicable law and the “cashless exercise” procedures (if any) approved by the Committee involving a broker or dealer.
The Option Price upon exercise of any Option shall be payable to the Company in full: (a) in cash; (b) by tendering previously acquired Shares valued at their Fair Market Value per Share at the time of exercise (provided that the Shares which are tendered must have been held by the Participant for at least six (6) months prior to their tender); (c) by a combination of (a) and (b); or (d) any other method approved by the Committee, in its sole discretion.


A-7


APPENDIX A
Subject to any governing rules or regulations, as soon as practicable after receipt of a notification of exercise and full payment, the Company shall deliver to the Participant, in the Participant’s name, Share certificates in an appropriate amount based upon the number of Shares purchased under the Option.
6.7  Restrictions on Share Transferability.  The Committee may impose such restrictions on any Shares acquired pursuant to the exercise of an Option granted under this Plan as it may deem advisable, including, without limitation, restrictions under applicable U.S. federal securities laws, under the requirements of any stock exchange or market upon which such Shares are then listedand/or traded, and under any blue sky or state securities laws applicable to such Shares.
6.8  Termination of Employment, Service or Directorship.  Each Option Award Agreement shall set forth the extent to which the Participant shall have the right to exercise the Option following termination of the Participant’s employment, service or directorship with the Companyand/or its Subsidiaries. Such provisions shall be determined in the sole discretion of the Committee, shall be included in each Award Agreement entered into with a Participant with respect to an Option Award, need not be uniform among all Options granted pursuant to this Article 6 and may reflect distinctions based on the reasons for termination.
6.9  Transferability of Options.
(a) Incentive Stock Options.  No ISO granted under this Plan may be sold, transferred, pledged, assigned or otherwise alienated or hypothecated, other than by will or by the laws of descent and distribution or pursuant to a qualified domestic relations order as defined by the Code or Title I of ERISA, or the regulations thereunder. Further, all ISOs granted to a Participant under this Plan shall be exercisable during his or her lifetime only by such Participant.
(b) Nonqualified Stock Options.  Except as otherwise provided in a Participant’s Award Agreement, NQSOs granted under this Plan may not be sold, transferred, pledged, assigned or otherwise alienated or hypothecated, other than by will or by the laws of descent and distribution or pursuant to a qualified domestic relations order as defined by the Code or Title I of ERISA, or the regulations thereunder. Further, except as otherwise provided in a Participant’s Award Agreement, all NQSOs granted to a Participant under this Plan shall be exercisable during his or her lifetime only by such Participant.
ARTICLE 7
Restricted Stock
7.1  Grant of Restricted Stock.  Subject to the terms and provisions of this Plan, the Committee at any time, and from time to time, may grant Shares as Restricted Stock (“Shares of Restricted Stock”) to Participants in such amounts as the Committee shall determine.
7.2  Restricted Stock Award Agreement.  Each Award of Restricted Stock shall be evidenced by an Award Agreement that shall specify the Period of Restriction, the number of Shares of Restricted Stock granted, and such other provisions as the Committee shall determine.
7.3  Transferability.  Except as provided in the Participant’s related Award Agreementand/or this Article 7, the Shares of Restricted Stock granted to a Participant under this Plan may not be sold, transferred, pledged, assigned or otherwise alienated or hypothecated until the end of the applicable Period of Restriction established by the Committee and specified in the related Award Agreement entered into with that Participant, or upon earlier satisfaction of any other conditions, as specified by the Committee in its sole discretion and set forth in the Award Agreement. During the applicable Period of Restriction, all rights with respect to the Restricted Stock granted to a Participant under this Plan shall be available during his or her lifetime only to such Participant. Any attempted assignment of Restricted Stock in violation of this Section 7.3 shall be null and void.
7.4  Other Restrictions.  The Committee may impose such other conditionsand/or restrictions on any Shares of Restricted Stock granted pursuant to this Plan as it may deem advisable, including, without limitation, a requirement that Participants pay a stipulated purchase price for each Share of Restricted Stock, restrictions based


A-8


APPENDIX A
upon the achievement of specific performance goals, time-based restrictions on vesting following the attainment of the performance goalsand/or restrictions under applicable U.S. federal or state securities laws.
To the extent deemed appropriate by the Committee, the Company may retain the certificates representing Shares of Restricted Stock in the Company’s possession until such time as all conditionsand/or restrictions applicable to such Shares have been satisfied or have lapsed.
7.5  Removal of Restrictions.  Except as otherwise provided in this Article 7, Shares of Restricted Stock covered by each Restricted Stock Award made under this Plan shall become freely transferable by the Participant after all conditions and restrictions applicable to such Shares have been satisfied or have lapsed.
7.6  Voting Rights.  To the extent permitted by the Committee or required by law, Participants holding Shares of Restricted Stock granted hereunder may exercise full voting rights with respect to those Shares during the applicable Period of Restriction.
7.7  Dividends.  During the applicable Period of Restriction, Participants holding Shares of Restricted Stock granted hereunder shall, unless the Committee otherwise determines, be credited with cash dividends paid with respect to the Shares, in a manner determined by the Committee in its sole discretion. The Committee may apply any restrictions to the dividends that it deems appropriate.
7.8  Termination of Employment, Service or Directorship.  Each Restricted Stock Award Agreement shall set forth the extent to which the Participant shall have the right to receive unvested Shares of Restricted Stock following termination of the Participant’s employment, service or directorship with the Companyand/or its Subsidiaries. Such provisions shall be determined in the sole discretion of the Committee, shall be included in each Award Agreement entered into with a Participant with respect to Shares of Restricted Stock, need not be uniform among all Shares of Restricted Stock granted pursuant to this Article 7 and may reflect distinctions based on the reasons for termination.
ARTICLE 8
Performance Units and Performance Shares
8.1  Grant of Performance Units/Shares.  Subject to the terms of this Plan, Performance Units and Performance Shares may be granted to Participants in such amounts and upon such terms, and at any time and from time to time, as shall be determined by the Committee.
8.2  Value of Performance Units/Shares.  Each Performance Unit shall have an initial value that is established by the Committee at the time of grant. Each Performance Share shall have an initial value equal to one hundred percent (100%) of the Fair Market Value of a Share on the date of grant. The Committee shall set performance goals in its discretion that, depending on the extent to which they are met, will determine the numberand/or value of Performance Units/Shares which will be paid out to the Participant.
8.3  Earning of Performance Units/Shares.  Subject to the terms of this Plan, after the applicable Performance Period has ended, the holder of Performance Units/Shares shall be entitled to receive payment of the number and value of Performance Units/Shares earned by the Participant over the Performance Period, to be determined as a function of the extent to which the corresponding performance goals have been achieved.
8.4  Form and Timing of Payment of Performance Units/Shares.  Subject to the provisions of Article 12 hereof, Payment of earned Performance Units/Shares to a Participant shall be made no later than March 15 following the end of the calendar year in which such Performance Units/Shares vest, or as soon as administratively practicable thereafter if payment is delayed due to unforeseeable events. Subject to the terms of this Plan, the Committee, in its sole discretion, may pay earned Performance Units/Shares in the form of cash or in Shares (or in a combination thereof) that have an aggregate Fair Market Value equal to the value of the earned Performance Units/Shares at the close of the applicable Performance Period. Any Shares issued or transferred to a Participant for this purpose may be granted subject to any restrictions that are deemed appropriate by the Committee.


A-9


APPENDIX A
8.5  Termination of Employment, Service or Directorship.  Each Award Agreement providing for a Performance Unit/Share shall set forth the extent to which the Participant shall have the right to receive a payout of cash or Shares with respect to unvested Performance Unit/Shares following termination of the Participant’s employment, service or directorship with the Companyand/or its Subsidiaries. Such provisions shall be determined in the sole discretion of the Committee, shall be included in the Award Agreement entered into with the Participant, need not be uniform among all Awards of Performance Units/Shares granted pursuant to this Article 8 and may reflect distinctions based on the reasons for termination.
8.6  Transferability.  Except as otherwise provided in a Participant’s related Award Agreement, Performance Units/Shares may not be sold, transferred, pledged, assigned or otherwise alienated or hypothecated, other than by will or by the laws of descent and distribution or pursuant to a qualified domestic relations order as defined by the Code or Title I of ERISA, or the regulations thereunder. Further, except as otherwise provided in a Participant’s related Award Agreement, a Participant’s rights with respect to Performance Units/Shares granted to that Participant under this Plan shall be exercisable during the Participant’s lifetime only by the Participant. Any attempted assignment of Performance Units/Shares in violation of this Section 8.6 shall be null and void.
ARTICLE 9
Restricted Stock Units
9.1  Grant of RSUs.  Subject to the terms and provisions of this Plan, the Committee at any time, and from time to time, may grant RSUs to eligible Participants in such amounts as the Committee shall determine.
9.2  RSU Award Agreement.  Each RSU Award to a Participant shall be evidenced by an RSU Award Agreement entered into with that Participant, which shall specify the Vesting Period, the number of RSUs granted, and such other provisions as the Committee shall determine in its sole discretion.
9.3  Transferability.  Except as provided in a Participant’s related Award Agreement, RSUs granted hereunder may not be sold, transferred, pledged, assigned or otherwise alienated or hypothecated, other than by will or by the laws of descent and distribution or pursuant to a qualified domestic relations order as defined by the Code or Title I of ERISA, or the regulations thereunder. Further, except as otherwise provided in a Participant’s related Award Agreement, a Participant’s rights with respect to an RSU Award granted to that Participant under this Plan shall be available during his or her lifetime only to such Participant. Any attempted assignment of an RSU Award in violation of this Section 9.3 shall be null and void.
9.4  Form and Timing of Delivery.  If a Participant’s RSU Award Agreement provides for payment in cash, payment equal to the Fair Market Value of the Shares underlying the RSU Award, calculated as of the last day of the applicable Vesting Period, shall be made in a single lump-sum payment. If a Participant’s RSU Award Agreement provides for payment in Shares, the Shares underlying the RSU Award shall be delivered to the Participant. Such payment of cash or Shares shall be made no later than March 15 following the end of the calendar year during which the RSU Award vests, or as soon as practicable thereafter if payment is delayed due to unforeseeable events. Such delivered Shares shall be freely transferable by the Participant.
9.5  Voting Rights and Dividends.  During the applicable Vesting Period, Participants holding RSUs shall not have voting rights with respect to the Shares underlying such RSUs. During the applicable Vesting Period, Participants holding RSUs granted hereunder shall, unless the Committee otherwise determines, be credited with dividend equivalents, in the form of cash or additional RSUs (as determined by the Committee in its sole discretion), if a cash dividend is paid with respect to the Shares. The extent to which dividend equivalents shall be credited shall be determined in the sole discretion of the Committee. Such dividend equivalents shall be subject to a Vesting Period equal to the remaining Vesting Period of the RSUs with respect to which the dividend equivalents are paid.
9.6  Termination of Employment, Service or Directorship.  Each RSU Award Agreement shall set forth the extent to which the applicable Participant shall have the right to receive a payout of cash or Shares with respect to unvested RSUs following termination of the Participant’s employment, service or directorship with the Companyand/or its Subsidiaries. Such provisions shall be determined in the sole discretion of the Committee, shall be


A-10


APPENDIX A
included in each Award Agreement entered into with a Participant with respect to RSUs, need not be uniform among all RSUs granted pursuant to this Article 9 and may reflect distinctions based on the reasons for termination.
ARTICLE 10
Performance Measures
10.1  Performance Measures.  Unless and until the Committee proposes and shareholders approve a change in the general performance measures set forth in this Article 10, the attainment of which may determine the degree of payoutand/or vesting with respect to Awards to Named Executive Officers which are designed to qualify for the Performance-Based Exception, the performance measure(s) to be used for purposes of such grants shall be chosen from among the following alternatives:
(a) Cash Flow;
(b) Cash Flow Return on Capital;
(c) Cash Flow Return on Assets;
(d) Cash Flow Return on Equity;
(e) Net Income;
(f) Return on Capital;
(g) Return on Assets;
(h) Return on Equity;
(i) Share Price;
(j) Earnings Per Share;
(k) Earnings Before Interest and Taxes;
(l) Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization;
(m) Total Return to Shareholders;
(n) Operating Income; and
(o) Return on Net Assets.
Subject to the terms of this Plan, each of these measures shall be defined by the Committee on a consolidated, group or division basis or in comparison to one or more peer group companies or indices, and may include or exclude specified extraordinary items as defined by the Company’s auditors.
10.2  Adjustments.  The Committee shall have the sole discretion to adjust determinations of the degree of attainment of the pre-established performance goals; provided, however, that Awards which are designed to qualify for the Performance-Based Exception and which are held by Named Executive Officers may not be adjusted upwards on a discretionary basis. The Committee shall retain the discretion to adjust such Awards downward.
10.3  Compliance with Code Section 162(m).  In the event that applicable taxand/or securities laws or regulations change to permit Committee discretion to alter the governing performance measures without obtaining shareholder approval of such changes, the Committee shall have sole discretion to make such changes without obtaining shareholder approval. In addition, in the event that the Committee determines that it is advisable to grant Awards to Named Executive Officers which shall not qualify for the Performance-Based Exception, the Committee may make such grants without satisfying the requirements of Code Section 162(m) and the regulations issued thereunder. Any performance-based Awards granted to Officers or Directors that are not intended to qualify as qualified performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) of the Code shall be based on achievement of


A-11


APPENDIX A
such performance measure(s) and be subject to such terms, conditions and restrictions as the Committee shall determine.
ARTICLE 11
Beneficiary Designation
Each Participant under this Plan may, from time to time, name any beneficiary or beneficiaries (who may be named contingently or successively) to whom any benefit under this Plan is to be paid in case of the Participant’s death before he or she receives any or all of such benefit. Each such designation shall revoke all prior designations by the same Participant, shall be in a form prescribed by the Company, and will be effective only when filed by the Participant in writing with the Company during the Participant’s lifetime. In the absence of any such designation, benefits remaining unpaid at the Participant’s death shall be paid to the Participant’s estate.
ARTICLE 12
Deferrals
The Committee may, in its sole discretion, permit selected Participants to elect to defer payment of some or all types of Awards, or may provide for the deferral of an Award in an Award Agreement; provided, however, that the timing of any such election and payment of any such deferral shall be specified in the Award Agreement and shall conform to the requirements of Code Section 409A(a)(2), (3) and (4) and the regulations and rulings issued thereunder. Any deferred payment, whether elected by a Participant or specified in an Award Agreement or by the Committee, may be forfeited if and to the extent that the applicable Award Agreement so provides.
ARTICLE 13
Rights of Employees, Directors and Consultants
13.1  Employment or Service.  Nothing in this Plan shall interfere with or limit in any way the right of the Company to terminate any Participant’s employment or service at any time, nor confer upon any Participant any right to continue in the employ or service of the Company.
13.2  No Contract of Employment.  Neither an Award nor any benefits arising under this Plan shall constitute part of a Participant’s employment contract with the Company or any Subsidiary, and accordingly, subject to the provisions of Article 15 hereof, this Plan and the benefits hereunder may be terminated at any time in the sole and exclusive discretion of the Board without giving rise to liability on the part of the Company or any Subsidiary for severance payments.
13.3  Transfers Between Participating Entities.  For purposes of this Plan, a transfer of a Participant’s employment between the Company and a Subsidiary, or between Subsidiaries, shall not be deemed to be a termination of employment. Upon such a transfer, the Committee may make such adjustments to outstanding Awards as it deems appropriate to reflect the change in reporting relationships.
ARTICLE 14
Change in Control
The treatment of outstanding Awards upon the occurrence of a Change in Control, unless otherwise specifically prohibited under applicable laws, or by the rules and regulations of any governing governmental agencies or national securities exchanges shall be determined in the sole discretion of the Committee and shall be described in the Award Agreements and need not be uniform among all Awards granted pursuant to this Plan.


A-12


APPENDIX A
ARTICLE 15
Amendment, Modification and Termination
15.1  Amendment, Modification, and Termination.  The Board may at any time and from time to time, alter, amend, suspend or terminate this Plan in whole or in part,provided, however,that shareholder approval shall be required for any amendment that materially alters the terms of this Plan or is otherwise required by applicable legal requirements. No amendment or alteration that would adversely affect the rights of any Participant under any Award previously granted to such Participant shall be made without the consent of such Participant.
15.2  Adjustment of Awards Upon the Occurrence of Certain Unusual or Nonrecurring Events.  The Committee may make adjustments in the terms and conditions of, and the criteria included in, Awards in recognition of unusual or nonrecurring events (including, without limitation, the events described in Section 4.3 hereof) affecting the Company or the financial statements of the Company or in recognition of changes in applicable laws, regulations or accounting principles, whenever the Committee determines that such adjustments are appropriate in order to prevent unintended dilution or enlargement of the benefits or potential benefits intended to be made available under this Plan.
ARTICLE 16
Withholding
The Company shall have the right to deduct applicable taxes from any Award payment and withhold, at the time of delivery or vesting of cash or Shares under this Plan, or at the time applicable law otherwise requires, an appropriate amount of cash or number of Shares or a combination thereof for payment of taxes required by law or to take such other action as may be necessary in the opinion of the Company to satisfy all obligations for withholding of such taxes. The Committee may permit withholding to be satisfied by the transfer to the Company of Shares theretofore owned by the holder of the Award with respect to which withholding is required. If Shares are used to satisfy tax withholding, such Shares shall be valued at their Fair Market Value on the date when the tax withholding is required to be made.
ARTICLE 17
Indemnification
Each person who is or shall have been a member of the Committee, or of the Board, or an officer of the Company to whom the Committee has delegated authority in accordance with Article 3 hereof, shall be indemnified and held harmless by the Company against and from: (a) any loss, cost, liability, or expense that may be imposed upon or reasonable incurred by him or her in connection with or resulting from any claim, action, suit or proceeding to which he or she may be a party or in which he or she may be involved by reason of any action taken or failure to act under this Plan, except for any such action or failure to act that constitutes willful misconduct on the part of such person or as to which any applicable statute prohibits the Company from providing indemnification; and (b) any and all amounts paid by him or her in settlement of any claim, action, suit or proceeding as to which indemnification is provided pursuant to clause (a) of this sentence, with the Company’s approval, or paid by him or her in satisfaction of any judgment or award in any such action, suit or proceeding against him or her, provided he or she shall give the Company an opportunity, at its own expense, to handle and defend the same before he or she undertakes to handle and defend it on his or her own behalf.
The foregoing right of indemnification shall be in addition to any other rights of indemnification to which such persons may be entitled under the Company’s Articles of Incorporation or Amended and Restated By-Laws (each, as amended from time to time), as a matter of law, or otherwise.


A-13


APPENDIX A
ARTICLE 18
Successors
All obligations of the Company under this Plan with respect to Awards granted hereunder shall be binding on any successor to the Company, whether the existence of such successor is the direct or indirect result of a merger, consolidation, purchase of all or substantially all of the businessand/or assets of the Company or other transaction.
ARTICLE 19
General Provisions
19.1  Restrictions and Legends.  No Shares or other form of payment shall be issued or transferred with respect to any Award unless the Company shall be satisfied that such issuance or transfer will be in compliance with applicable U.S. federal and state securities laws. The Committee may require each person receiving Shares pursuant to an Award under this Plan to represent to and agree with the Company in writing that the Participant is acquiring the Shares for investment without a view to distribution thereof. Any certificates evidencing Shares delivered under this Plan (to the extent that such Shares are so evidenced) may be subject to such stop-transfer orders and other restrictions as the Committee may deem advisable under the rules, regulations and other requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission, any securities exchange or transaction reporting system upon which the Shares are then listed or to which they are admitted for quotation and any applicable U.S. federal or state securities law. In addition to any other legend required by this Plan, any certificates for such Shares may include any legend that the Committee deems appropriate to reflect any restrictions on transfer of such Shares.
19.2  Gender and Number.  Except where otherwise indicated by the context, any masculine term used herein also shall include the feminine, the plural shall include the singular and the singular shall include the plural.
19.3  Severability.  If any provision of this Plan shall be held illegal or invalid for any reason, the illegality or invalidity shall not affect the remaining parts of this Plan, and this Plan shall be construed and enforced as if the illegal or invalid provision had not been included.
19.4  Requirements of Law.  The granting of Awards and the issuance of Shares under this Plan shall be subject to all applicable laws, rules and regulations, and to such approvals by any governmental agencies or national securities exchanges as may be required.
19.5  Uncertificated Shares.  To the extent that this Plan provides for issuance of certificates to reflect the transfer of Shares, the transfer of such Shares may be effected on a noncertificated basis, to the extent not prohibited by applicable law or the rules of any stock exchange or transaction reporting system on which the Shares are listed or to which the Shares are admitted for quotation.
19.6  Unfunded Plan.  Insofar as this Plan provides for Awards of cash, Shares or rights thereto, it will be unfunded. Although the Company may establish bookkeeping accounts with respect to Participants who are entitled to cash, Shares or rights thereto under this Plan, it will use any such accounts merely as a bookkeeping convenience. Participants shall have no right, title or interest whatsoever in or to any investments that the Company may make to aid it in meeting its obligations under this Plan. Nothing contained in this Plan, and no action taken pursuant to its provisions, shall create or be construed to create a trust of any kind, or a fiduciary relationship between the Company and any Participant, beneficiary, legal representative or any other person. To the extent that any person acquires a right to receive payments from the Company under this Plan, such right shall be no greater than the right of an unsecured general creditor of the Company. All payments to be made hereunder shall be paid from the general funds of the Company and no special or separate fund shall be established and no segregation of assets shall be made to assure payment of such amounts, except as expressly set forth in this Plan. This Plan is not intended to be subject to ERISA.
19.7  No Fractional Shares.  No fractional Shares shall be issued or delivered pursuant to this Plan or any Award. The Committee shall determine whether cash, Awards or other property shall be delivered or paid in lieu of fractional Shares or whether such fractional Shares or any rights thereto shall be forfeited or otherwise eliminated.


A-14


APPENDIX A
19.8  Governing Law.  This Plan and all determinations made and actions taken pursuant hereto, to the extent not otherwise governed by mandatory provisions of the Code or the securities laws of the United States, will be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas, without giving effect to any conflicts of laws provisions thereof that would result in the application of the laws of any other jurisdiction.


A-15


(McDERMOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC. LOGO)
 

Dated: March 30, 2012

LOGO


(PROXY)

LOGO

VOTE BY INTERNET — www.proxyvote.comUse-www.proxyvote.com

Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information up until 11:59 P.M.p.m. Eastern Time on May 9, 2012 (May 7, 2009 (May 5, 20092012 for participants in McDermott’s Thrift Plan). Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site and follow the instructions to obtain your records and MCDERMOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC.toto create an electronic voting instruction form.777 N. ELDRIDGE PARKWAYVOTEform.

VOTE BY PHONE — 1-800-690-6903HOUSTON, TX 77079Use- 1-800-690-6903

Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions up until 11:59 P.M.p.m. Eastern Time on May 9, 2012 (May 7, 2009 (May 5, 20092012 for participants in McDermott’s Thrift Plan). Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions.VOTEinstructions.

VOTE BY MAILMark,MAIL

Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717, so that it is received prior to the Annual Meeting on May 8, 2009.ELECTRONIC11717.

ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF FUTURE PROXY MATERIALSIfMATERIALS

If you would like to reduce the costs incurred by our company in mailing proxy materials, you can consent to receivereceiving all future proxy statements, proxy cards and annual reports electronically via e-mail or the Internet. To sign up for electronic delivery, please follow the instructions above to vote using the Internet and, when prompted, indicate that you agree to receive or access proxy materials electronically in future years.TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK:MCDMI1KEEP THIS TOP PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDSTHIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED.DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLYMCDERMOTTyears.

TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS:

M43299-P20059                         KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS

DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY

THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED.

MCDERMOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC.For INC.For
All
Withhold AllFor All
Except
To withhold authority to vote for any individual All All Except nominee(s), mark “For All Except” and write theThe Board of Directors recommends a vote “FOR“the number(s) of the nominee(s) on the line below. Items 1, 2 and 3.Vote On Directors0 0 01.Election
The Board of DirectorsNominees as Class I Directors:Directors recommends you vote FOR the following:

1.

Election of Directors

¨¨¨

Nominees:

01)    John F. Bookout, III

05)    D. Bradley McWilliams
02)    Roger A. Brown 02) John A. Fees 03) Oliver D. Kingsley, Jr.Nominees as Class II Directors:04) D. Bradley McWilliams 05) Richard W. Mies 06)    Thomas C. SchievelbeinFor Against AbstainVote On Proposals2.ApproveSchievelbein
03)    Stephen G. Hanks07)    Mary Shafer-Malicki
04)    Stephen M. Johnson08)    David A. Trice
The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR the 2009 McDermott International, Inc. Long-Term Incentive Plan.0 0 03.Ratificationfollowing proposals:ForAgainstAbstain

2.

Advisory vote to approve named executive officer compensation.

¨

¨

¨

3.

Ratification of the appointment of McDermott’s independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2009.0 0 0The2012.

¨

¨

¨

The shares represented by this proxy when properly executed will be voted in the manner directed herein by the undersigned Stockholder(s).If.If no direction is made, this proxy will be voted FOR ALL for item 1, and FOR items 1, 2 and 3. If any other matters properly come before the meeting, the personpersons named in this proxy will vote in their discretion.Fordiscretion.

For address changes and/or comments, please check this0this box and write them on the back where indicated.Yes No indicated.

Please indicate if you plan to attend this meeting.0 0Pleasemeeting.

¨

        ¨

¨

YesNo

Please sign your name exactly as it appears hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, trustee, guardian or guardian,other fiduciary, please add yourgive full title as such. When signing as joint tenants, all parties in the joint tenancy must sign. If a signer is a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name by duly authorized officer.Signatureofficer.

Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX]DateSignatureDate        Signature (Joint Owners)Date

 


(PROXY)
LOGO

McDermott International, Inc.AnnualInc.

Annual Meeting Friday,

Thursday, May 8, 200910, 2012 at 9:3010:00 a.m.

757 N. Eldridge Parkway, 14thFl.Houston, TX, 77079Dear14th Floor

Houston, Texas 77079

Dear Stockholder:

McDermott International, Inc. encourages you to vote the shares electronically through the Internet or the telephone, which are available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. This eliminates the need to return the proxy card.Yourcard.

Your electronic vote authorizes the named proxies in the same manner as if you marked, signed, dated and returned the proxy card.Ifcard.

If you choose to vote the shares electronically, there is no need for you to mail back the proxy card.Importantcard.

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting:

The Notice and Proxy Statement 10-K and Shareholder LetterAnnual Report are available at www.proxyvote.com.IF YOU HAVE NOT VOTED VIA THE INTERNET OR TELEPHONE, FOLD ALONG PERFORATION, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPEMCDMI2McDermott International, Inc.THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORSANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERSwww.proxyvote.com

IF YOU HAVE NOT VOTED VIA THE INTERNET OR TELEPHONE, FOLD ALONG PERFORATION,

DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE

M432100-P20059        

McDERMOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC.

This proxy is solicited on behalf of the Board of Directors

Annual Meeting of Stockholders - Friday,Thursday, May 8, 2009The10, 2012 at 10:00 a.m.

The undersigned hereby appoints John A. FeesStephen M. Johnson and Liane K. Hinrichs, and each of them individually, as proxies, each with the power to appoint (his/ her)his or her substitute, and hereby authorizes them to represent and to vote, as designated on the reverse side of this ballot, all of the shares of Common Stock of McDermott International, Inc.MCDERMOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC. (“McDermott”), that the stockholder(s) is/are entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held at 9:3010:00 a.m., local time, on Friday,Thursday, May 8, 2009,10, 2012 at 757 N. Eldridge Parkway, 14th Floor,floor, Houston, TX,Texas 77079, and any adjournment or postponement thereof.THISthereof.

THIS PROXY, WHEN PROPERLY EXECUTED, WILL BE VOTED AS DIRECTED BY THE STOCKHOLDER(S). IF NO SUCH DIRECTIONS ARE MADE, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED FOR THE ELECTION OF THE NOMINEES LISTED UNDER ITEM 1 ON THE REVERSE SIDE FOR THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS, AND FOR EACH PROPOSAL.THEOF ITEMS 2 AND 3.

THE UNDERSIGNED ACKNOWLEDGES RECEIPT OF MCDERMOTT’S ANNUAL REPORT FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 20082011 AND ITSNOTICEITS NOTICE OF 20092012 ANNUAL MEETING AND RELATED PROXY STATEMENT.ATTENTIONSTATEMENT.

ATTENTION PARTICIPANTS IN MCDERMOTT’S THRIFT PLAN: If you hold shares of McDermott common stock through Thethe McDermott Thrift Plan for Employees of McDermott Incorporated and Participating Subsidiary and Affiliated Companies (the “Thrift Plan”), this proxy covers all shares for which the undersigned has the right to give voting instructions to Vanguard Fiduciary Trust Company (“Vanguard”), Trustee of the McDermott Thrift Plan. Your proxy must be received no later than 11:59 P.M.p.m. Eastern Time on May 5, 2009.7, 2012. Any shares of McDermott common stock held in the Thrift Plan that are not voted or for which Vanguard does not receive timely voting instructions, will be voted in the same proportion as the shares for which Vanguard receives timely voting instructions from other participants in the Thrift Plan.PLEASEPlan.

PLEASE MARK, SIGN, DATE AND RETURN THIS PROXY CARD PROMPTLY USING THE ENCLOSED REPLY ENVELOPEAddressCARD ENVELOPE

Address Changes/Comments: (If

(If you noted any Address Changes/Comments above, please mark corresponding box on the reverse side.)

CONTINUED AND TO BE SIGNED ON REVERSE SIDE


(PROXY)
MCDERMOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC. Shareholder Meeting to be held on 5/8/2009 ** IMPORTANT NOTICE ** Proxy Materials Available Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials Notice and Proxy Statement Form 10-K You are receiving this communication because you hold shares in the Shareholder Letter above company, and the materials you should review before you cast your vote are now available. This communication presents only an overview of the more complete proxy materials that are available to you on the Internet. We encourage you to access and review all of the important information contained in the proxy materials before voting. PROXY MATERIALS — VIEW OR RECEIVE You can choose to view the materials online or receive a paper or e-mail copy. There is NO charge for requesting a copy. To facilitate timely delivery please make the request as instructed below on or before 4/24/09. MCDERMOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC. HOW TO VIEW MATERIALS VIA THE INTERNET 777 N. ELDRIDGE PARKWAY HOUSTON, TX 77079 Have the 12 Digit Control Number available and visit: www.proxyvote.com HOW TO REQUEST A COPY OF MATERIALS 1) BY INTERNET — www.proxyvote.com 2) BY TELEPHONE — 1-800-579-1639 3) BY E-MAIL* — sendmaterial@proxyvote.com *If requesting materials by e-mail, please send a blank e-mail with the 12 Digit Control Number (located on the following page) in the subject line. R1MDI1 See the Reverse Side for Meeting Information and Instructions on How to Vote


(PROXY)
Meeting Information How To Vote Meeting Type: Annual Vote In Person Meeting Date: 5/8/2009 Please check the meeting materials for any special Meeting Time: 9:30 a.m. requirements for meeting attendance. At the meeting, you For holders as of: 3/9/09 will need to request a ballot to vote these shares. Meeting Location: McDermott International, Inc. 757 N. Eldridge Parkway, 14th Fl. Houston, TX 77079 Vote By Internet To vote now by Internet, go to WWW.PROXYVOTE.COM. Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time on May 7, 2009 (May 5, 2009 for participants in McDermott’s Thrift Plan). Have your notice in hand when you access the web site and follow the instructions. R1MDI2


(PROXY)
Voting items The Board of Directors recommends a vote “FOR” Items 1, 2 and 3. 1. Election of Directors Nominees as Class I Directors: 01) Roger A. Brown 02) John A. Fees 03) Oliver D. Kingsley, Jr. Nominees as Class II Directors: 04) D. Bradley McWilliams 05) Richard W. Mies 06) Thomas C. Schievelbein 2. Approve the 2009 McDermott International, Inc. Long-Term Incentive Plan. 3. Ratification of appointment of McDermott’s independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2009. R1MDI3


(PROXY)
R1MDI4


(PROXY)
MCDERMOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC. Shareholder Meeting to be held on 5/8/2009 ** IMPORTANT NOTICE ** Proxy Materials Available Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials Notice and Proxy Statement Form 10-K You are receiving this communication because you hold shares in the above company, and the materials you should review before you cast your Shareholder Letter vote are now available. This communication presents only an overview of the more complete proxy materials that are available to you on the Internet. We encourage you to access and review all of the important information contained in the proxy materials before voting. PROXY MATERIALS — VIEW OR RECEIVE You can choose to view the materials online or receive a paper or e-mail copy. There is NO charge for requesting a copy. Requests, instructions and other inquiries will NOT be forwarded to your investment advisor. To facilitate timely delivery please make the request as instructed below on or before 4/24/09. HOW TO VIEW MATERIALS VIA THE INTERNET Have the 12 Digit Control Number available and visit: www.proxyvote.com HOW TO REQUEST A COPY OF MATERIALS 1) BY INTERNET — www.proxyvote.com 2) BY TELEPHONE — 1-800-579-1639 3) BY E-MAIL* — sendmaterial@proxyvote.com *If requesting materials by e-mail, please send a blank e-mail with the 12 Digit Control Number (located on the following page) in the subject line. B1MDI1 See the Reverse Side for Meeting Information and Instructions on How to Vote


(PROXY)
Meeting Information How To Vote Vote In Person Meeting Type: Annual Meeting Date: 5/8/2009 Should you choose to vote these shares in person at the meeting you must request a “legal proxy.” To request a Meeting Time: 9:30 a.m. legal proxy please follow the instructions at For holders as of: 3/9/09 www.proxyvote.com or request a paper copy of the materials. Many shareholder meetings have attendance Meeting Location: requirements including, but not limited to, the possession of an attendance ticket issued by the entity holding the McDermott International, Inc. meeting. Please check the meeting materials for any special requirements for meeting attendance. 757 N. Eldridge Parkway, 14th Fl. Houston, TX 77079 Vote By Internet To vote now by Internet, go to WWW.PROXYVOTE.COM. Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time the day before the cut-off date or meeting date. Have your notice in hand when you access the web site and follow the instructions. B1MDI2


(PROXY)
Voting items The Board of Directors recommends a vote “FOR” Items 1, 2 and 3. 1. Election of Directors Nominees as Class I Directors: 01) Roger A. Brown 02) John A. Fees 03) Oliver D. Kingsley, Jr. Nominees as Class II Directors: 04) D. Bradley McWilliams 05) Richard W. Mies 06) Thomas C. Schievelbein 2. Approve the 2009 McDermott International, Inc. Long-Term Incentive Plan. 3. Ratification of appointment of McDermott’s independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2009. B1MDI3


(PROXY)
Voting items Continued Voting Instructions B1MDI4